Literature DB >> 19680046

Health care provider and consumer awareness, perceptions, and use of direct-to-consumer personal genomic tests, United States, 2008.

Katherine Kolor, Tiebin Liu, Jeanette St Pierre, Muin J Khoury.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh：

Year:  2009        PMID： 19680046     DOI： 10.1097/GIM.0b013e3181b1cc2c

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genet Med        ISSN： 1098-3600            Impact factor:   8.822


× No keyword cloud information.
  45 in total

1.  An exploration of genetic health professionals' experience with direct-to-consumer genetic testing in their clinical practice.

Authors:  Gemma R Brett; Sylvia A Metcalfe; David J Amor; Jane L Halliday
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2012-02-08       Impact factor: 4.246

2.  Public understanding of risks from gene-environment interaction in common diseases: implications for public communications.

Authors:  C M Condit; L Shen
Journal:  Public Health Genomics       Date:  2010-08-13       Impact factor: 2.000

3.  The prospect of genome-guided preventive medicine: a need and opportunity for genetic counselors.

Authors:  Julianne M O'Daniel
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2010-05-04       Impact factor: 2.537

4.  Perception of direct-to-consumer genetic testing and direct-to-consumer advertising of genetic tests among members of a large managed care organization.

Authors:  Alanna Kulchak Rahm; Heather Spencer Feigelson; Nicole Wagner; Anh Quynh Le; Eve Halterman; Nadine Cornish; James W Dearing
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2012-01-26       Impact factor: 2.537

5.  To ban or not to ban? Clinical geneticists' views on the regulation of direct-to-consumer genetic testing.

Authors:  Heidi Carmen Howard; Pascal Borry
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2012-08-14       Impact factor: 8.807

6.  Regulation of consumer genomic tests remains in limbo.

Authors:  Malorye Allison
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 54.908

Review 7.  Direct-to-consumer personalized genomic testing.

Authors:  Cinnamon S Bloss; Burcu F Darst; Eric J Topol; Nicholas J Schork
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2011-08-09       Impact factor: 6.150

Review 8.  Genetic testing and common disorders in a public health framework: how to assess relevance and possibilities. Background Document to the ESHG recommendations on genetic testing and common disorders.

Authors:  Frauke Becker; Carla G van El; Dolores Ibarreta; Eleni Zika; Stuart Hogarth; Pascal Borry; Anne Cambon-Thomsen; Jean Jacques Cassiman; Gerry Evers-Kiebooms; Shirley Hodgson; A Cécile J W Janssens; Helena Kaariainen; Michael Krawczak; Ulf Kristoffersson; Jan Lubinski; Christine Patch; Victor B Penchaszadeh; Andrew Read; Wolf Rogowski; Jorge Sequeiros; Lisbeth Tranebjaerg; Irene M van Langen; Helen Wallace; Ron Zimmern; Jörg Schmidtke; Martina C Cornel
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 4.246

9.  Primary care physicians' awareness, experience and opinions of direct-to-consumer genetic testing.

Authors:  Karen P Powell; Whitney A Cogswell; Carol A Christianson; Gaurav Dave; Amit Verma; Sonja Eubanks; Vincent C Henrich
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2011-07-16       Impact factor: 2.537

10.  Characteristics of genomic test consumers who spontaneously share results with their health care provider.

Authors:  Burcu F Darst; Lisa Madlensky; Nicholas J Schork; Eric J Topol; Cinnamon S Bloss
Journal:  Health Commun       Date:  2013-02-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.