Literature DB >> 23322235

Direct-to-consumer genomic testing from the perspective of the health professional: a systematic review of the literature.

Lesley Goldsmith1, Leigh Jackson, Anita O'Connor, Heather Skirton.   

Abstract

Since the 1990s, there has been a rapid expansion in the number and type of genetic tests available via health professionals; the last 10 years, however, have seen certain types of genetic and genomic tests available direct-to-consumer. The aim of this systematic review was to explore the topic of direct-to-consumer genetic testing from the health professional perspective. Search terms used to identify studies were 'direct-to-consumer', personal genom*, health* professional*, physician* 'genomic, genetic' in five bibliographic databases, together with citation searching. Eight quantitative papers were reviewed. Findings indicate a low level of awareness and experience of direct-to-consumer testing in health professionals. Inconsistent levels of knowledge and understanding were also found with two studies showing significant effects for gender and age. Concerns about clinical utility and lack of counselling were identified. Health professionals specialising in genetics were most likely to express concerns. There was also evidence of perceived increased workload for health professionals post-testing. However, some health professionals rated such tests clinically useful and cited benefits such as the increased opportunity for early screening. Despite limited awareness, knowledge and experience of actual cases, we concluded that the concerns and potential benefits expressed may be warranted. It may be useful to explore the attitudes and experiences of health professionals in more depth using a qualitative approach. Finally, it is essential that health professionals receive sufficient education and guidelines to equip them to help patients presenting with the results of these tests.

Entities:  

Year:  2013        PMID: 23322235      PMCID: PMC3666834          DOI: 10.1007/s12687-012-0135-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Community Genet        ISSN: 1868-310X


  37 in total

1.  Illusions of scientific legitimacy: misrepresented science in the direct-to-consumer genetic-testing marketplace.

Authors:  Amy B Vashlishan Murray; Michael J Carson; Corey A Morris; Jon Beckwith
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  2010-09-09       Impact factor: 11.639

2.  Health-care referrals from direct-to-consumer genetic testing.

Authors:  Monica A Giovanni; Matthew R Fickie; Lisa S Lehmann; Robert C Green; Lisa M Meckley; David Veenstra; Michael F Murray
Journal:  Genet Test Mol Biomarkers       Date:  2010-10-28

3.  Letting the genome out of the bottle--will we get our wish?

Authors:  David J Hunter; Muin J Khoury; Jeffrey M Drazen
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2008-01-10       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Direct-to-consumer genetic testing: good, bad or benign?

Authors:  T Caulfield; N M Ries; P N Ray; C Shuman; B Wilson
Journal:  Clin Genet       Date:  2009-11-21       Impact factor: 4.438

5.  Direct to consumer genetic testing.

Authors:  Christine Hauskeller
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2011-04-21

6.  Educational needs of primary care physicians regarding direct-to-consumer genetic testing.

Authors:  Karen P Powell; Carol A Christianson; Whitney A Cogswell; Gaurav Dave; Amit Verma; Sonja Eubanks; Vincent C Henrich
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2011-12-30       Impact factor: 2.537

7.  Social networkers' attitudes toward direct-to-consumer personal genome testing.

Authors:  Amy L McGuire; Christina M Diaz; Tao Wang; Susan G Hilsenbeck
Journal:  Am J Bioeth       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 11.229

8.  Genomic risk profiling: attitudes and use in personal and clinical care of primary care physicians who offer risk profiling.

Authors:  Susanne B Haga; Madeline M Carrig; Julianne M O'Daniel; Lori A Orlando; Ley A Killeya-Jones; Geoffrey S Ginsburg; Alex Cho
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2011-02-11       Impact factor: 5.128

9.  Community interest in predictive genetic testing for susceptibility to major depressive disorder in a large national sample.

Authors:  A Wilde; B Meiser; P B Mitchell; D Hadzi-Pavlovic; P R Schofield
Journal:  Psychol Med       Date:  2010-12-15       Impact factor: 7.723

10.  Deficiency of knowledge of genetics and genetic tests among general practitioners, gynecologists, and pediatricians: a global problem.

Authors:  Marieke J H Baars; Lidewij Henneman; Leo P Ten Kate
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2005 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 8.822

View more
  18 in total

1.  Captious certainties: makings, meanings and misreadings of consumer-oriented genetic testing.

Authors:  Norbert W Paul; Mita Banerjee; Susanne Michl
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2013-11-08

Review 2.  Personalized weight loss strategies-the role of macronutrient distribution.

Authors:  J Alfredo Martinez; Santiago Navas-Carretero; Wim H M Saris; Arne Astrup
Journal:  Nat Rev Endocrinol       Date:  2014-10-14       Impact factor: 43.330

3.  Factors Associated with Acceptability, Consideration and Intention of Uptake of Direct-To-Consumer Genetic Testing: A Survey Study.

Authors:  Kelly F J Stewart; Daša Kokole; Anke Wesselius; Annemie M W J Schols; Maurice P Zeegers; Hein de Vries; Liesbeth A D M van Osch
Journal:  Public Health Genomics       Date:  2018-10-25       Impact factor: 2.000

4.  A prospective cohort study assessing clinical referral management & workforce allocation within a UK regional medical genetics service.

Authors:  Caroline Benjamin; Catherine Houghton; Claire Foo; Chris Edgar; Gail Mannion; Jan Birch; Ian Ellis; Astrid Weber
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2015-03-11       Impact factor: 4.246

Review 5.  Communication of cancer-related genetic and genomic information: A landscape analysis of reviews.

Authors:  Emily B Peterson; Wen-Ying Sylvia Chou; Anna Gaysynsky; Melinda Krakow; Ashley Elrick; Muin J Khoury; Kimberly A Kaphingst
Journal:  Transl Behav Med       Date:  2018-01-29       Impact factor: 3.046

6.  Do physicians think genomic medicine will be useful for patient care?

Authors:  Sridharan Raghavan; Jason L Vassy
Journal:  Per Med       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 2.512

Review 7.  Considerations for developing regulations for direct-to-consumer genetic testing: a scoping review using the 3-I framework.

Authors:  Alexandra Cernat; Naazish S Bashir; Wendy J Ungar
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2022-02-16

Review 8.  The composition and capacity of the clinical genetics workforce in high-income countries: a scoping review.

Authors:  Nick Dragojlovic; Kennedy Borle; Nicola Kopac; Ursula Ellis; Patricia Birch; Shelin Adam; Jan M Friedman; Amy Nisselle; Alison M Elliott; Larry D Lynd
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2020-06-24       Impact factor: 8.822

9.  Direct to consumer testing in reproductive contexts--should health professionals be concerned?

Authors:  Heather Skirton
Journal:  Life Sci Soc Policy       Date:  2015-04-29

10.  Survey of European clinical geneticists on awareness, experiences and attitudes towards direct-to-consumer genetic testing.

Authors:  Heidi Carmen Howard; Pascal Borry
Journal:  Genome Med       Date:  2013-05-22       Impact factor: 11.117

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.