Literature DB >> 23275180

Attitudes of health care professionals toward carrier screening for cystic fibrosis. A review of the literature.

S Janssens1, A De Paepe, P Borry.   

Abstract

Recent technological developments in molecular genetics facilitate the large-scale detection of inherited genetic disorders and allow an increasing number of genetic conditions to be screened for (American College of Medical Genetics 2012). This technological evolution creates the background which makes reflection necessary about the desirability to offer community-based (preconception) carrier screening in the healthcare system. A positive attitude of potential providers is vital to the success of a screening program. Therefore, the objective of this article is to elaborate a review of the attitudes of healthcare professionals toward carrier screening. Examination of existing carrier screening programs could provide such information. The literature review will be focused on the attitudes toward carrier screening for cystic fibrosis (CF). The databases Pubmed and Web of Science, as well as the interface Google Scholar, were searched using the keywords for the period 1990-2011. Studies were selected if they were published in a peer-reviewed journal in English and described the attitudes of potential providers toward carrier screening. Eleven studies were retrieved describing the attitudes toward carrier screening for CF. In total, seven studies reported attitudes toward the best time for carrier screening; four studies described opinions toward the best setting to offer CF carrier screening; six studies investigated the willingness to be involved in a carrier screening program, and in total 11 articles reported the concerns about offering carrier screening. Ten papers described a general attitude toward carrier screening. We can conclude that health care providers state willingness to be involved in a carrier screening program, but there is need for appropriate education as well as adequate support given the time constraints already present in consultation. The prospect of an increasing number of genetic disorders for which screening becomes possible, and the potential increasing demand for such screening in the future calls for the need for further debate on the desirability of carrier screening and relevant questions such as the conditions screened, the providers involved, the information provision, and counseling.

Entities:  

Year:  2012        PMID: 23275180      PMCID: PMC3890063          DOI: 10.1007/s12687-012-0131-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Community Genet        ISSN: 1868-310X


  76 in total

1.  Tay-Sachs screening: social and psychological impact.

Authors:  B Childs; L Gordis; M M Kaback; H H Kazazian
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1976-11       Impact factor: 11.025

Review 2.  Population screening in the age of genomic medicine.

Authors:  Muin J Khoury; Linda L McCabe; Edward R B McCabe
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2003-01-02       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Is cascade testing a sensible method of population screening?

Authors:  J K Morris
Journal:  J Med Screen       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 2.136

Review 4.  ACOG Committee Opinion No. 486: Update on carrier screening for cystic fibrosis.

Authors: 
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 7.661

5.  Screening for carriers of cystic fibrosis. Screening before pregnancy is needed.

Authors:  J A Raeburn
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1994-11-26

6.  The impact of population based screening for carriers of cystic fibrosis.

Authors:  H Bekker; G Denniss; M Modell; M Bobrow; T Marteau
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 6.318

7.  Twenty-year outcome analysis of genetic screening programs for Tay-Sachs and beta-thalassemia disease carriers in high schools.

Authors:  J J Mitchell; A Capua; C Clow; C R Scriver
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 11.025

8.  Identification of the cystic fibrosis gene: chromosome walking and jumping.

Authors:  J M Rommens; M C Iannuzzi; B Kerem; M L Drumm; G Melmer; M Dean; R Rozmahel; J L Cole; D Kennedy; N Hidaka
Journal:  Science       Date:  1989-09-08       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Cascade carrier-testing in cystic fibrosis.

Authors:  Theresa Roberts; Martin J Schwarz; Rowan Kerr-Liddell; Joanna L Hinks; Maurice Super
Journal:  Paediatr Respir Rev       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 2.726

10.  Tay Sachs disease carrier screening in schools: educational alternatives and cheekbrush sampling.

Authors:  Alexandra A Gason; Sylvia A Metcalfe; Martin B Delatycki; Vicki Petrou; Edith Sheffield; Agnes Bankier; Maryanne Aitken
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2005 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 8.822

View more
  11 in total

1.  Predictive genetic testing, risk communication, and risk perception: an international expert meeting in Berlin, Germany.

Authors:  Eva Fisher; Steffi Achilles; Holger Tönnies
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2013-12-10

2.  Creation of a National, At-home Model for Ashkenazi Jewish Carrier Screening.

Authors:  Karen Arnovitz Grinzaid; Patricia Zartman Page; Jessica Johnson Denton; Jessica Ginsberg
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2014-12-12       Impact factor: 2.537

3.  Expanded carrier screening: a current survey of physician utilization and attitudes.

Authors:  Allison Briggs; Parvaneh K Nouri; Michael Galloway; Kathleen O'Leary; Nigel Pereira; Steven R Lindheim
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2018-08-01       Impact factor: 3.412

4.  Evaluation of two-year Jewish genetic disease screening program in Atlanta: insight into community genetic screening approaches.

Authors:  Yunru Shao; Shuling Liu; Karen Grinzaid
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2015-01-07

5.  Newborn screening for cystic fibrosis: Role of primary care providers in caring for infants with positive screening results.

Authors:  June C Carroll; Robin Z Hayeems; Fiona A Miller; Carolyn J Barg; Yvonne Bombard; Pranesh Chakraborty; Beth K Potter; Jessica Peace Bytautas; Karen Tam; Louise Taylor; Elizabeth Kerr; Christine Davies; Jennifer Milburn; Felix Ratjen; Astrid Guttmann
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2021-06       Impact factor: 3.275

6.  Responsible implementation of expanded carrier screening.

Authors:  Lidewij Henneman; Pascal Borry; Davit Chokoshvili; Martina C Cornel; Carla G van El; Francesca Forzano; Alison Hall; Heidi C Howard; Sandra Janssens; Hülya Kayserili; Phillis Lakeman; Anneke Lucassen; Sylvia A Metcalfe; Lovro Vidmar; Guido de Wert; Wybo J Dondorp; Borut Peterlin
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2016-03-16       Impact factor: 4.246

7.  Factors for successful implementation of population-based expanded carrier screening: learning from existing initiatives.

Authors:  Kim C A Holtkamp; Inge B Mathijssen; Phillis Lakeman; Merel C van Maarle; Wybo J Dondorp; Lidewij Henneman; Martina C Cornel
Journal:  Eur J Public Health       Date:  2017-04-01       Impact factor: 3.367

8.  Stakeholder perspectives on the implementation of genetic carrier screening in a changing landscape.

Authors:  Kim C A Holtkamp; Evelien M Vos; Tessel Rigter; Phillis Lakeman; Lidewij Henneman; Martina C Cornel
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2017-02-16       Impact factor: 2.655

9.  Ethical issues in preconception genetic carrier screening.

Authors:  Ulrik Kihlbom
Journal:  Ups J Med Sci       Date:  2016-07-08       Impact factor: 2.384

10.  Cystic fibrosis: to screen or not to screen? Involving a Citizens' jury in decisions on screening carrier.

Authors:  Paola Mosconi; Carlo Castellani; Walter Villani; Roberto Satolli
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2014-09-09       Impact factor: 3.377

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.