Literature DB >> 21745606

Direct ink writing of highly porous and strong glass scaffolds for load-bearing bone defects repair and regeneration.

Qiang Fu1, Eduardo Saiz, Antoni P Tomsia.   

Abstract

The quest for synthetic materials to repair load-bearing bone lost because of trauma, cancer, or congenital bone defects requires the development of porous, high-performance scaffolds with exceptional mechanical strength. However, the low mechanical strength of porous bioactive ceramic and glass scaffolds, compared with that of human cortical bone, has limited their use for these applications. In the present work bioactive 6P53B glass scaffolds with superior mechanical strength were fabricated using a direct ink writing technique. The rheological properties of Pluronic® F-127 (referred to hereafter simply as F-127) hydrogel-based inks were optimized for the printing of features as fine as 30 μm and of three-dimensional scaffolds. The mechanical strength and in vitro degradation of the scaffolds were assessed in a simulated body fluid (SBF). The sintered glass scaffolds showed a compressive strength (136 ± 22 MPa) comparable with that of human cortical bone (100-150 MPa), while the porosity (60%) was in the range of that of trabecular bone (50-90%). The strength is ~100-times that of polymer scaffolds and 4-5-times that of ceramic and glass scaffolds with comparable porosities. Despite the strength decrease resulting from weight loss during immersion in SBF, the value (77 MPa) is still far above that of trabecular bone after 3 weeks. The ability to create both porous and strong structures opens a new avenue for fabricating scaffolds for load-bearing bone defect repair and regeneration. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21745606      PMCID: PMC3163833          DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2011.06.030

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Biomater        ISSN: 1742-7061            Impact factor:   8.947


  29 in total

1.  Sintering and robocasting of beta-tricalcium phosphate scaffolds for orthopaedic applications.

Authors:  Pedro Miranda; Eduardo Saiz; Karol Gryn; Antoni P Tomsia
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2006-05-24       Impact factor: 8.947

2.  Preparation and in vitro evaluation of bioactive glass (13-93) scaffolds with oriented microstructures for repair and regeneration of load-bearing bones.

Authors:  Qiang Fu; Mohamed N Rahaman; B Sonny Bal; Roger F Brown
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res A       Date:  2010-06-15       Impact factor: 4.396

3.  Direct write assembly of calcium phosphate scaffolds using a water-based hydrogel.

Authors:  J Franco; P Hunger; M E Launey; A P Tomsia; E Saiz
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2009-06-27       Impact factor: 8.947

4.  Silicate, borosilicate, and borate bioactive glass scaffolds with controllable degradation rate for bone tissue engineering applications. I. Preparation and in vitro degradation.

Authors:  Qiang Fu; Mohamed N Rahaman; Hailuo Fu; Xin Liu
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res A       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 4.396

5.  Bioactive glass scaffolds for bone tissue engineering: state of the art and future perspectives.

Authors:  Qiang Fu; Eduardo Saiz; Mohamed N Rahaman; Antoni P Tomsia
Journal:  Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl       Date:  2011-10-10       Impact factor: 7.328

6.  Bioinspired Strong and Highly Porous Glass Scaffolds.

Authors:  Qiang Fu; Eduardo Saiz; Antoni P Tomsia
Journal:  Adv Funct Mater       Date:  2011-03-22       Impact factor: 18.808

7.  Smart hydrogels for in situ generated implants.

Authors:  Daniel Cohn; Alejandro Sosnik; Shai Garty
Journal:  Biomacromolecules       Date:  2005 May-Jun       Impact factor: 6.988

8.  Concentrated hydroxyapatite inks for direct-write assembly of 3-D periodic scaffolds.

Authors:  Sarah Michna; Willie Wu; Jennifer A Lewis
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2005-04-21       Impact factor: 12.479

9.  Fabrication and in vitro characterization of three-dimensional organic/inorganic scaffolds by robocasting.

Authors:  J Russias; E Saiz; S Deville; K Gryn; G Liu; R K Nalla; A P Tomsia
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res A       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 4.396

10.  Proangiogenic potential of a collagen/bioactive glass substrate.

Authors:  Ann Leu; J Kent Leach
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2007-11-30       Impact factor: 4.200

View more
  34 in total

Review 1.  Three-Dimensional-Printing of Bio-Inspired Composites.

Authors:  Grace Xiang Gu; Isabelle Su; Shruti Sharma; Jamie L Voros; Zhao Qin; Markus J Buehler
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 2.097

2.  Mechanical properties of bioactive glass (13-93) scaffolds fabricated by robotic deposition for structural bone repair.

Authors:  Xin Liu; Mohamed N Rahaman; Gregory E Hilmas; B Sonny Bal
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2013-02-21       Impact factor: 8.947

3.  Cellular Response to 3-D Printed Bioactive Silicate and Borosilicate Glass Scaffolds.

Authors:  Weitao Jia; Grace Y Lau; Wenhai Huang; Changqing Zhang; Antoni P Tomsia; Qiang Fu
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater       Date:  2018-09-08       Impact factor: 3.368

Review 4.  3D Printing of Calcium Phosphate Ceramics for Bone Tissue Engineering and Drug Delivery.

Authors:  Ryan Trombetta; Jason A Inzana; Edward M Schwarz; Stephen L Kates; Hani A Awad
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2016-06-20       Impact factor: 3.934

5.  Tough and strong porous bioactive glass-PLA composites for structural bone repair.

Authors:  Wei Xiao; Mohsen Asle Zaeem; Guangda Li; B Sonny Bal; Mohamed N Rahaman
Journal:  J Mater Sci       Date:  2017-01-17       Impact factor: 4.220

6.  Strength, toughness, and reliability of a porous glass/biopolymer composite scaffold.

Authors:  Qiang Fu; Weitao Jia; Grace Y Lau; Antoni P Tomsia
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater       Date:  2017-06-01       Impact factor: 3.368

7.  Designing Biomaterials for 3D Printing.

Authors:  Murat Guvendiren; Joseph Molde; Rosane M D Soares; Joachim Kohn
Journal:  ACS Biomater Sci Eng       Date:  2016-04-13

Review 8.  Dental applications of nanostructured bioactive glass and its composites.

Authors:  Alessandro Polini; Hao Bai; Antoni P Tomsia
Journal:  Wiley Interdiscip Rev Nanomed Nanobiotechnol       Date:  2013-04-18

Review 9.  3D-Printing Technologies for Craniofacial Rehabilitation, Reconstruction, and Regeneration.

Authors:  Ethan L Nyberg; Ashley L Farris; Ben P Hung; Miguel Dias; Juan R Garcia; Amir H Dorafshar; Warren L Grayson
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2016-06-13       Impact factor: 3.934

10.  Enhanced bone regeneration in rat calvarial defects implanted with surface-modified and BMP-loaded bioactive glass (13-93) scaffolds.

Authors:  Xin Liu; Mohamed N Rahaman; Yongxing Liu; B Sonny Bal; Lynda F Bonewald
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2013-04-06       Impact factor: 8.947

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.