Literature DB >> 30195262

Cellular Response to 3-D Printed Bioactive Silicate and Borosilicate Glass Scaffolds.

Weitao Jia1, Grace Y Lau2, Wenhai Huang3, Changqing Zhang1, Antoni P Tomsia2, Qiang Fu2,4.   

Abstract

The repair and regeneration of loaded segmental bone defects is a challenge for both materials and biomedical science communities. Our recent work demonstrated the capability of bioactive glass in supporting bone healing and defect bridging using a rabbit femur segmental defect model without growth factors or bone marrow stromal cells (BMSCs). Here in the current work, a comprehensive in vitro evaluation of bioactive silicate (13-93) and borosilicate (2B6Sr) glass scaffolds was conducted to provide further understanding of their biological performances and to establish a correlation between in vitro and in vivo behaviors. Our in vitro evaluation using a murine MC3T3-E1 cell line confirmed the capability of both scaffolds to support cell attachment, vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) formation, and to stimulate mineral deposition and osteoblast marker gene expression. In particular, borosilicate (2B6Sr) glass showed a better capability in supporting the mineralization and gene expression than silicate (13-93) glass, consistent with a faster bone healing ability in vivo. The current in vitro results, combined with our previous in vivo findings, provide a strong basis for the further translational evaluation of bioactive glass scaffolds and for potential preclinical practice.
© 2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. Part B, 2018. © 2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res Part B: Appl Biomater 107B: 818-824, 2019. © 2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bioactive glass; angiogenesis; mineralization

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30195262      PMCID: PMC6408292          DOI: 10.1002/jbm.b.34178

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater        ISSN: 1552-4973            Impact factor:   3.368


  23 in total

1.  Scaffolds in tissue engineering bone and cartilage.

Authors:  D W Hutmacher
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 12.479

Review 2.  Third-generation biomedical materials.

Authors:  Larry L Hench; Julia M Polak
Journal:  Science       Date:  2002-02-08       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  The effects of strontium-substituted bioactive glasses on osteoblasts and osteoclasts in vitro.

Authors:  Eileen Gentleman; Yann C Fredholm; Gavin Jell; Nasrin Lotfibakhshaiesh; Matthew D O'Donnell; Robert G Hill; Molly M Stevens
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2010-02-18       Impact factor: 12.479

4.  Silicate, borosilicate, and borate bioactive glass scaffolds with controllable degradation rate for bone tissue engineering applications. II. In vitro and in vivo biological evaluation.

Authors:  Qiang Fu; Mohamed N Rahaman; B Sonny Bal; Lynda F Bonewald; Keiichi Kuroki; Roger F Brown
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res A       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 4.396

5.  Silicate, borosilicate, and borate bioactive glass scaffolds with controllable degradation rate for bone tissue engineering applications. I. Preparation and in vitro degradation.

Authors:  Qiang Fu; Mohamed N Rahaman; Hailuo Fu; Xin Liu
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res A       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 4.396

6.  45S5 Bioglass-derived glass-ceramic scaffolds for bone tissue engineering.

Authors:  Qizhi Z Chen; Ian D Thompson; Aldo R Boccaccini
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2005-12-05       Impact factor: 12.479

Review 7.  Bioactive glass in tissue engineering.

Authors:  Mohamed N Rahaman; Delbert E Day; B Sonny Bal; Qiang Fu; Steven B Jung; Lynda F Bonewald; Antoni P Tomsia
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2011-03-21       Impact factor: 8.947

8.  Bioinspired Strong and Highly Porous Glass Scaffolds.

Authors:  Qiang Fu; Eduardo Saiz; Antoni P Tomsia
Journal:  Adv Funct Mater       Date:  2011-03-22       Impact factor: 18.808

9.  Dual effect of strontium ranelate: stimulation of osteoblast differentiation and inhibition of osteoclast formation and resorption in vitro.

Authors:  Edith Bonnelye; Anne Chabadel; Frédéric Saltel; Pierre Jurdic
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2007-09-12       Impact factor: 4.398

10.  Effect of borate glass composition on its conversion to hydroxyapatite and on the proliferation of MC3T3-E1 cells.

Authors:  Roger F Brown; Mohamed N Rahaman; Agatha B Dwilewicz; Wenhai Huang; Delbert E Day; Yadong Li; B Sonny Bal
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res A       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 4.396

View more
  2 in total

1.  A Chemical Approach to Optimizing Bioactive Glass Dental Composites.

Authors:  S Aponso; J G Ummadi; H Davis; J Ferracane; D Koley
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  2018-11-21       Impact factor: 6.116

2.  Evaluating the Effect of Non-cellular Bioactive Glass-Containing Scaffolds on Osteogenesis and Angiogenesis in in vivo Animal Bone Defect Models.

Authors:  Chanuka D S Ranmuthu; Charindu K I Ranmuthu; Jodie C Russell; Disha Singhania; Wasim S Khan
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2020-05-14
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.