Literature DB >> 27324800

3D Printing of Calcium Phosphate Ceramics for Bone Tissue Engineering and Drug Delivery.

Ryan Trombetta1,2, Jason A Inzana2,3, Edward M Schwarz1,2,4, Stephen L Kates2,5, Hani A Awad6,7,8.   

Abstract

Additive manufacturing, also known as 3D printing, has emerged over the past 3 decades as a disruptive technology for rapid prototyping and manufacturing. Vat polymerization, powder bed fusion, material extrusion, and binder jetting are distinct technologies of additive manufacturing, which have been used in a wide variety of fields, including biomedical research and tissue engineering. The ability to print biocompatible, patient-specific geometries with controlled macro- and micro-pores, and to incorporate cells, drugs and proteins has made 3D-printing ideal for orthopaedic applications, such as bone grafting. Herein, we performed a systematic review examining the fabrication of calcium phosphate (CaP) ceramics by 3D printing, their biocompatibility in vitro, and their bone regenerative potential in vivo, as well as their use in localized delivery of bioactive molecules or cells. Understanding the advantages and limitations of the different 3D printing approaches, CaP materials, and bioactive additives through critical evaluation of in vitro and in vivo evidence of efficacy is essential for developing new classes of bone graft substitutes that can perform as well as autografts and allografts or even surpass the performance of these clinical standards.

Entities:  

Keywords:  3D printing; Binder jetting; Bone; Drug delivery; Material extrusion; Powder bed fusion; Tissue engineering; Vat polymerization

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27324800      PMCID: PMC5173433          DOI: 10.1007/s10439-016-1678-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng        ISSN: 0090-6964            Impact factor:   3.934


  89 in total

1.  Hierarchical mesoporous bioactive glass/alginate composite scaffolds fabricated by three-dimensional plotting for bone tissue engineering.

Authors:  Yongxiang Luo; Chengtie Wu; Anja Lode; Michael Gelinsky
Journal:  Biofabrication       Date:  2012-12-11       Impact factor: 9.954

2.  Bone regeneration in critical bone defects using three-dimensionally printed β-tricalcium phosphate/hydroxyapatite scaffolds is enhanced by coating scaffolds with either dipyridamole or BMP-2.

Authors:  Stephanie Ishack; Aranzazu Mediero; Tuere Wilder; John L Ricci; Bruce N Cronstein
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater       Date:  2015-10-29       Impact factor: 3.368

3.  Osteogenesis of adipose-derived stem cells on polycaprolactone-β-tricalcium phosphate scaffold fabricated via selective laser sintering and surface coating with collagen type I.

Authors:  Han-Tsung Liao; Ming-Yih Lee; Wen-Wei Tsai; Hsiu-Chen Wang; Wei-Chieh Lu
Journal:  J Tissue Eng Regen Med       Date:  2013-08-16       Impact factor: 3.963

4.  Poly(propylene fumarate) bone tissue engineering scaffold fabrication using stereolithography: effects of resin formulations and laser parameters.

Authors:  Kee-Won Lee; Shanfeng Wang; Bradley C Fox; Erik L Ritman; Michael J Yaszemski; Lichun Lu
Journal:  Biomacromolecules       Date:  2007-02-28       Impact factor: 6.988

Review 5.  Next generation calcium phosphate-based biomaterials.

Authors:  L C Chow
Journal:  Dent Mater J       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 2.102

6.  Impaired fracture healing in the absence of TNF-alpha signaling: the role of TNF-alpha in endochondral cartilage resorption.

Authors:  L C Gerstenfeld; T J Cho; T Kon; T Aizawa; A Tsay; J Fitch; G L Barnes; D T Graves; T A Einhorn
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 6.741

7.  Prolonged presence of VEGF promotes vascularization in 3D bioprinted scaffolds with defined architecture.

Authors:  Michelle T Poldervaart; Hendrik Gremmels; Kelly van Deventer; Joost O Fledderus; F Cumhur Oner; Marianne C Verhaar; Wouter J A Dhert; Jacqueline Alblas
Journal:  J Control Release       Date:  2014-04-13       Impact factor: 9.776

8.  Mechanical properties and cytotoxicity of a resorbable bioactive implant prepared by rapid prototyping technique.

Authors:  Ahmed El-Ghannam; Amanda Hart; Dean White; Larry Cunningham
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res A       Date:  2013-03-18       Impact factor: 4.396

9.  Selective laser sintering fabrication of nano-hydroxyapatite/poly-ε-caprolactone scaffolds for bone tissue engineering applications.

Authors:  Yan Xia; Panyu Zhou; Xiaosong Cheng; Yang Xie; Chong Liang; Chao Li; Shuogui Xu
Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine       Date:  2013-11-01

10.  3D plotting of growth factor loaded calcium phosphate cement scaffolds.

Authors:  Ashwini Rahul Akkineni; Yongxiang Luo; Matthias Schumacher; Berthold Nies; Anja Lode; Michael Gelinsky
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2015-08-28       Impact factor: 8.947

View more
  47 in total

Review 1.  ZnO Nanostructures and Electrospun ZnO-Polymeric Hybrid Nanomaterials in Biomedical, Health, and Sustainability Applications.

Authors:  Eloisa Ferrone; Rodolfo Araneo; Andrea Notargiacomo; Marialilia Pea; Antonio Rinaldi
Journal:  Nanomaterials (Basel)       Date:  2019-10-12       Impact factor: 5.076

2.  Polymeric 3D Printed Structures for Soft-Tissue Engineering.

Authors:  Scott Stratton; Ohan S Manoukian; Ravi Patel; Adam Wentworth; Swetha Rudraiah; Sangamesh G Kumbar
Journal:  J Appl Polym Sci       Date:  2017-09-14       Impact factor: 3.125

3.  Multimaterial Segmented Fiber Printing for Gradient Tissue Engineering.

Authors:  Luis Diaz-Gomez; Brandon T Smith; Panayiotis D Kontoyiannis; Sean M Bittner; Anthony J Melchiorri; Antonios G Mikos
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part C Methods       Date:  2018-12-28       Impact factor: 3.056

Review 4.  Tissue Engineering for the Temporomandibular Joint.

Authors:  Timothy M Acri; Kyungsup Shin; Dongrim Seol; Noah Z Laird; Ino Song; Sean M Geary; Jaidev L Chakka; James A Martin; Aliasger K Salem
Journal:  Adv Healthc Mater       Date:  2018-12-17       Impact factor: 9.933

Review 5.  Bioprinting: From Tissue and Organ Development to in Vitro Models.

Authors:  Carlos Mota; Sandra Camarero-Espinosa; Matthew B Baker; Paul Wieringa; Lorenzo Moroni
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2020-05-14       Impact factor: 60.622

6.  Three dimensional printed calcium phosphate and poly(caprolactone) composites with improved mechanical properties and preserved microstructure.

Authors:  Joseph B Vella; Ryan P Trombetta; Michael D Hoffman; Jason Inzana; Hani Awad; Danielle S W Benoit
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res A       Date:  2017-11-02       Impact factor: 4.396

Review 7.  Integration of biological systems with electronic-mechanical assemblies.

Authors:  Ning Yi; Haitao Cui; Lijie Grace Zhang; Huanyu Cheng
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2019-04-17       Impact factor: 8.947

Review 8.  3D Printing for Bone Regeneration.

Authors:  Amit Bandyopadhyay; Indranath Mitra; Susmita Bose
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2020-10       Impact factor: 5.096

Review 9.  Biomaterials for Craniofacial Bone Regeneration.

Authors:  Greeshma Thrivikraman; Avathamsa Athirasala; Chelsea Twohig; Sunil Kumar Boda; Luiz E Bertassoni
Journal:  Dent Clin North Am       Date:  2017-10

10.  Conditioning of 3D Printed Nanoengineered Ionic-Covalent Entanglement Scaffolds with iP-hMSCs Derived Matrix.

Authors:  Candice Sears; Eli Mondragon; Zachary I Richards; Nick Sears; David Chimene; Eoin P McNeill; Carl A Gregory; Akhilesh K Gaharwar; Roland Kaunas
Journal:  Adv Healthc Mater       Date:  2020-03-08       Impact factor: 9.933

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.