Literature DB >> 21912447

Bioactive glass scaffolds for bone tissue engineering: state of the art and future perspectives.

Qiang Fu1, Eduardo Saiz, Mohamed N Rahaman, Antoni P Tomsia.   

Abstract

The repair and regeneration of large bone defects resulting from disease or trauma remains a significant clinical challenge. Bioactive glass has appealing characteristics as a scaffold material for bone tissue engineering, but the application of glass scaffolds for the repair of load-bearing bone defects is often limited by their low mechanical strength and fracture toughness. This paper provides an overview of recent developments in the fabrication and mechanical properties of bioactive glass scaffolds. The review reveals the fact that mechanical strength is not a real limiting factor in the use of bioactive glass scaffolds for bone repair, an observation not often recognized by most researchers and clinicians. Scaffolds with compressive strengths comparable to those of trabecular and cortical bones have been produced by a variety of methods. The current limitations of bioactive glass scaffolds include their low fracture toughness (low resistance to fracture) and limited mechanical reliability, which have so far received little attention. Future research directions should include the development of strong and tough bioactive glass scaffolds, and their evaluation in unloaded and load-bearing bone defects in animal models.

Entities:  

Year:  2011        PMID: 21912447      PMCID: PMC3169803          DOI: 10.1016/j.msec.2011.04.022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl        ISSN: 0928-4931            Impact factor:   7.328


  97 in total

1.  Optimal design and fabrication of scaffolds to mimic tissue properties and satisfy biological constraints.

Authors:  S J Hollister; R D Maddox; J M Taboas
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 12.479

Review 2.  Bone tissue engineering: state of the art and future trends.

Authors:  António J Salgado; Olga P Coutinho; Rui L Reis
Journal:  Macromol Biosci       Date:  2004-08-09       Impact factor: 4.979

3.  Sintering and robocasting of beta-tricalcium phosphate scaffolds for orthopaedic applications.

Authors:  Pedro Miranda; Eduardo Saiz; Karol Gryn; Antoni P Tomsia
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2006-05-24       Impact factor: 8.947

4.  Preparation and in vitro evaluation of bioactive glass (13-93) scaffolds with oriented microstructures for repair and regeneration of load-bearing bones.

Authors:  Qiang Fu; Mohamed N Rahaman; B Sonny Bal; Roger F Brown
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res A       Date:  2010-06-15       Impact factor: 4.396

5.  Silicate, borosilicate, and borate bioactive glass scaffolds with controllable degradation rate for bone tissue engineering applications. I. Preparation and in vitro degradation.

Authors:  Qiang Fu; Mohamed N Rahaman; Hailuo Fu; Xin Liu
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res A       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 4.396

6.  Evaluation of Graftskin composite grafts on full-thickness wounds on athymic mice.

Authors:  J F Hansbrough; J Morgan; G Greenleaf; M Parikh; C Nolte; L Wilkins
Journal:  J Burn Care Rehabil       Date:  1994 Jul-Aug

Review 7.  A review of the mechanical behavior of CaP and CaP/polymer composites for applications in bone replacement and repair.

Authors:  Amy J Wagoner Johnson; Brad A Herschler
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2010-07-21       Impact factor: 8.947

8.  Development of glass-ceramic scaffolds for bone tissue engineering: characterisation, proliferation of human osteoblasts and nodule formation.

Authors:  C Vitale-Brovarone; E Verné; L Robiglio; P Appendino; F Bassi; G Martinasso; G Muzio; R Canuto
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2006-11-07       Impact factor: 8.947

9.  Characterization of zinc-releasing three-dimensional bioactive glass scaffolds and their effect on human adipose stem cell proliferation and osteogenic differentiation.

Authors:  Suvi Haimi; Giada Gorianc; Loredana Moimas; Bettina Lindroos; Heini Huhtala; Sari Räty; Hannu Kuokkanen; George K Sándor; Chiara Schmid; Susanna Miettinen; Riitta Suuronen
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2009-04-16       Impact factor: 8.947

10.  Proangiogenic potential of a collagen/bioactive glass substrate.

Authors:  Ann Leu; J Kent Leach
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2007-11-30       Impact factor: 4.200

View more
  74 in total

1.  Rheological evaluations and in vitro studies of injectable bioactive glass-polycaprolactone-sodium alginate composites.

Authors:  Shokoufeh Borhan; Saeed Hesaraki; Ali-Asghar Behnamghader; Ebrahim Ghasemi
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2016-07-18       Impact factor: 3.896

2.  Enhanced osteointegration of poly(methylmethacrylate) bone cements by incorporating strontium-containing borate bioactive glass.

Authors:  Xu Cui; Chengcheng Huang; Meng Zhang; Changshun Ruan; Songlin Peng; Li Li; Wenlong Liu; Ting Wang; Bing Li; Wenhai Huang; Mohamed N Rahaman; William W Lu; Haobo Pan
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 4.118

3.  A porous polymeric-hydroxyapatite scaffold used for femur fractures treatment: fabrication, analysis, and simulation.

Authors:  Saeid Esmaeili; Hossein Akbari Aghdam; Mehdi Motififard; Saeed Saber-Samandari; Amir Hussein Montazeran; Mohammad Bigonah; Erfan Sheikhbahaei; Amirsalar Khandan
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2019-08-16

4.  Mechanical properties of bioactive glass (13-93) scaffolds fabricated by robotic deposition for structural bone repair.

Authors:  Xin Liu; Mohamed N Rahaman; Gregory E Hilmas; B Sonny Bal
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2013-02-21       Impact factor: 8.947

5.  A two-scale Weibull approach to the failure of porous ceramic structures made by robocasting: possibilities and limits.

Authors:  Martin Genet; Manuel Houmard; Salvador Eslava; Eduardo Saiz; Antoni P Tomsia
Journal:  J Eur Ceram Soc       Date:  2012-11-26       Impact factor: 5.302

6.  Cellular Response to 3-D Printed Bioactive Silicate and Borosilicate Glass Scaffolds.

Authors:  Weitao Jia; Grace Y Lau; Wenhai Huang; Changqing Zhang; Antoni P Tomsia; Qiang Fu
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater       Date:  2018-09-08       Impact factor: 3.368

Review 7.  Scaffold design for bone regeneration.

Authors:  Liliana Polo-Corrales; Magda Latorre-Esteves; Jaime E Ramirez-Vick
Journal:  J Nanosci Nanotechnol       Date:  2014-01

8.  Incorporation of a silicon-based polymer to PEG-DA templated hydrogel scaffolds for bioactivity and osteoinductivity.

Authors:  Michael T Frassica; Sarah K Jones; Patricia Diaz-Rodriguez; Mariah S Hahn; Melissa A Grunlan
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2019-09-16       Impact factor: 8.947

9.  Enhanced biological properties of collagen/chitosan-coated poly(ε-caprolactone) scaffold by surface modification with GHK-Cu peptide and 58S bioglass.

Authors:  Amir Mahdi Molavi; Alireza Sadeghi-Avalshahr; Samira Nokhasteh; Hojjat Naderi-Meshkin
Journal:  Prog Biomater       Date:  2020-04-04

10.  Compressive fatigue and fracture toughness behavior of injectable, settable bone cements.

Authors:  Andrew J Harmata; Sasidhar Uppuganti; Mathilde Granke; Scott A Guelcher; Jeffry S Nyman
Journal:  J Mech Behav Biomed Mater       Date:  2015-08-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.