Literature DB >> 23567939

Enhanced bone regeneration in rat calvarial defects implanted with surface-modified and BMP-loaded bioactive glass (13-93) scaffolds.

Xin Liu1, Mohamed N Rahaman, Yongxing Liu, B Sonny Bal, Lynda F Bonewald.   

Abstract

The repair of large bone defects, such as segmental defects in the long bones of the limbs, is a challenging clinical problem. Our recent work has shown the ability to create porous scaffolds of silicate 13-93 bioactive glass by robocasting which have compressive strengths comparable to human cortical bone. The objective of this study was to evaluate the capacity of those strong porous scaffolds with a grid-like microstructure (porosity=50%; filament width=330μm; pore width=300μm) to regenerate bone in a rat calvarial defect model. Six weeks post-implantation, the amount of new bone formed within the implants was evaluated using histomorphometric analysis. The amount of new bone formed in implants composed of the as-fabricated scaffolds was 32% of the available pore space (area). Pretreating the as-fabricated scaffolds in an aqueous phosphate solution for 1, 3 and 6days to convert a surface layer to hydroxyapatite prior to implantation enhanced new bone formation to 46%, 57% and 45%, respectively. New bone formation in scaffolds pretreated for 1, 3 and 6days and loaded with bone morphogenetic protein-2 (BMP-2) (1μg per defect) was 65%, 61% and 64%, respectively. The results show that converting a surface layer of the glass to hydroxyapatite or loading the surface-treated scaffolds with BMP-2 can significantly improve the capacity of 13-93 bioactive glass scaffolds to regenerate bone in an osseous defect. Based on their mechanical properties evaluated previously and their capacity to regenerate bone found in this study, these 13-93 bioactive glass scaffolds, pretreated or loaded with BMP-2, are promising in structural bone repair.
Copyright © 2013 Acta Materialia Inc. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23567939      PMCID: PMC3669642          DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2013.03.039

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Biomater        ISSN: 1742-7061            Impact factor:   8.947


  37 in total

Review 1.  Bone graft substitutes.

Authors:  Cato Laurencin; Yusuf Khan; Saadiq F El-Amin
Journal:  Expert Rev Med Devices       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 3.166

2.  Enhanced bone regeneration with BMP-2 loaded functional nanoparticle-hydrogel complex.

Authors:  Yong-Il Chung; Kang-Min Ahn; Seung-Ho Jeon; Seung-Young Lee; Jong-Ho Lee; Giyoong Tae
Journal:  J Control Release       Date:  2007-06-02       Impact factor: 9.776

Review 3.  Bone morphogenetic proteins in tissue engineering: the road from the laboratory to the clinic, part I (basic concepts).

Authors:  P C Bessa; M Casal; R L Reis
Journal:  J Tissue Eng Regen Med       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 3.963

4.  Evaluation of bone regeneration, angiogenesis, and hydroxyapatite conversion in critical-sized rat calvarial defects implanted with bioactive glass scaffolds.

Authors:  Lianxiang Bi; Steve Jung; Delbert Day; Katie Neidig; Vladimir Dusevich; David Eick; Lynda Bonewald
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res A       Date:  2012-06-26       Impact factor: 4.396

5.  Silicate, borosilicate, and borate bioactive glass scaffolds with controllable degradation rate for bone tissue engineering applications. I. Preparation and in vitro degradation.

Authors:  Qiang Fu; Mohamed N Rahaman; Hailuo Fu; Xin Liu
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res A       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 4.396

6.  Bioactive glass scaffolds for bone tissue engineering: state of the art and future perspectives.

Authors:  Qiang Fu; Eduardo Saiz; Mohamed N Rahaman; Antoni P Tomsia
Journal:  Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl       Date:  2011-10-10       Impact factor: 7.328

Review 7.  Biophysical stimulation of bone fracture repair, regeneration and remodelling.

Authors:  Edmund Y S Chao; Nozomu Inoue
Journal:  Eur Cell Mater       Date:  2003-12-31       Impact factor: 3.942

8.  Bone regeneration in strong porous bioactive glass (13-93) scaffolds with an oriented microstructure implanted in rat calvarial defects.

Authors:  Xin Liu; Mohamed N Rahaman; Qiang Fu
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2012-08-23       Impact factor: 8.947

9.  Effect of borate glass composition on its conversion to hydroxyapatite and on the proliferation of MC3T3-E1 cells.

Authors:  Roger F Brown; Mohamed N Rahaman; Agatha B Dwilewicz; Wenhai Huang; Delbert E Day; Yadong Li; B Sonny Bal
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res A       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 4.396

10.  Kinetics and mechanisms of the conversion of silicate (45S5), borate, and borosilicate glasses to hydroxyapatite in dilute phosphate solutions.

Authors:  Wenhai Huang; Delbert E Day; Kanisa Kittiratanapiboon; Mohamed N Rahaman
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 4.727

View more
  5 in total

1.  Tough and strong porous bioactive glass-PLA composites for structural bone repair.

Authors:  Wei Xiao; Mohsen Asle Zaeem; Guangda Li; B Sonny Bal; Mohamed N Rahaman
Journal:  J Mater Sci       Date:  2017-01-17       Impact factor: 4.220

2.  50 years of scanning electron microscopy of bone-a comprehensive overview of the important discoveries made and insights gained into bone material properties in health, disease, and taphonomy.

Authors:  Furqan A Shah; Krisztina Ruscsák; Anders Palmquist
Journal:  Bone Res       Date:  2019-05-22       Impact factor: 13.567

3.  Bone regeneration by nanohydroxyapatite/chitosan/poly(lactide-co-glycolide) scaffolds seeded with human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells in the calvarial defects of the nude mice.

Authors:  Fei Wang; Xiao-Xia Su; Yu-Cheng Guo; Ang Li; Yin-Cheng Zhang; Hong Zhou; Hu Qiao; Li-Min Guan; Min Zou; Xin-Qin Si
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-10-13       Impact factor: 3.411

4.  Bioactive glass based scaffolds coated with gelatin for the sustained release of icariin.

Authors:  Theresa Reiter; Tanja Panick; Katharina Schuhladen; Judith A Roether; Jasmin Hum; Aldo R Boccaccini
Journal:  Bioact Mater       Date:  2018-11-18

Review 5.  Main 3D Manufacturing Techniques for Customized Bone Substitutes. A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Javier Montero; Alicia Becerro; Beatriz Pardal-Peláez; Norberto Quispe-López; Juan-Francisco Blanco; Cristina Gómez-Polo
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-12       Impact factor: 3.623

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.