Literature DB >> 28570023

Strength, toughness, and reliability of a porous glass/biopolymer composite scaffold.

Qiang Fu1, Weitao Jia2, Grace Y Lau1, Antoni P Tomsia1.   

Abstract

Development of bioactive glass and ceramic scaffolds intended for the reconstruction of large segmental bone defects remains a challenge for materials science due to the complexities involved in clinical implantation, bone-implant reaction, implant degradation and the multiple loading modes the implants subjected to. A comprehensive evaluation of the mechanical properties of inorganic scaffolds and exploration of new ways to toughen brittle constructs are critical prior to their successful application in loaded sites. A simple and widely adopted approach involves the coating of an inorganic scaffold with a polymeric material. In this work, a systematic evaluation of the influence of a biopolymer, polycaprolactone (PCL), coating on the mechanical performance of bioactive glass scaffolds was carried out. Results from this work indicate that a biopolymer PCL coating was more effective in increasing the compressive strength and reliability of the glass scaffold under compression, but less effective in improving its flexural strength or fracture toughness. This is the first report that reveals the limited successfulness of a polymer coating in improving the toughness of strong scaffolds, suggesting that new and novel ways of toughening inorganic scaffolds should be future research directions for scaffolds applied in loaded sites.
© 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res Part B: Appl Biomater, 106B: 1209-1217, 2018. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  bioactive glass scaffold; fracture toughness; mechanical strength; polymeric coating; reliability

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28570023      PMCID: PMC5718971          DOI: 10.1002/jbm.b.33924

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater        ISSN: 1552-4973            Impact factor:   3.368


  36 in total

1.  Materials science. A composite matter of alignment.

Authors:  Peter Fratzl
Journal:  Science       Date:  2012-01-13       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Mechanical properties and cytocompatibility of poly(ε-caprolactone)-infiltrated biphasic calcium phosphate scaffolds with bimodal pore distribution.

Authors:  Marianna Peroglio; Laurent Gremillard; Catherine Gauthier; Laurent Chazeau; Sophie Verrier; Mauro Alini; Jérôme Chevalier
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2010-05-27       Impact factor: 8.947

3.  Role of scaffold internal structure on in vivo bone formation in macroporous calcium phosphate bioceramics.

Authors:  Maddalena Mastrogiacomo; Silvia Scaglione; Roberta Martinetti; Laura Dolcini; Francesco Beltrame; Ranieri Cancedda; Rodolfo Quarto
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2006-02-20       Impact factor: 12.479

Review 4.  Review of bioactive glass: from Hench to hybrids.

Authors:  Julian R Jones
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2012-08-21       Impact factor: 8.947

5.  Potential of ceramic materials as permanently implantable skeletal prostheses.

Authors:  S F Hulbert; F A Young; R S Mathews; J J Klawitter; C D Talbert; F H Stelling
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res       Date:  1970-09

Review 6.  Role of bone substitutes.

Authors:  J O Hollinger; J Brekke; E Gruskin; D Lee
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Bioactive glass scaffolds for bone tissue engineering: state of the art and future perspectives.

Authors:  Qiang Fu; Eduardo Saiz; Mohamed N Rahaman; Antoni P Tomsia
Journal:  Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl       Date:  2011-10-10       Impact factor: 7.328

8.  Reinforcing bioceramic scaffolds with in situ synthesized ε-polycaprolactone coatings.

Authors:  Francisco J Martínez-Vázquez; Pedro Miranda; Fernando Guiberteau; Antonia Pajares
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res A       Date:  2013-04-30       Impact factor: 4.396

Review 9.  A review of the mechanical behavior of CaP and CaP/polymer composites for applications in bone replacement and repair.

Authors:  Amy J Wagoner Johnson; Brad A Herschler
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2010-07-21       Impact factor: 8.947

10.  Non-crystalline composite tissue engineering scaffolds using boron-containing bioactive glass and poly(D,L-lactic acid) coatings.

Authors:  T Mantsos; X Chatzistavrou; J A Roether; L Hupa; H Arstila; A R Boccaccini
Journal:  Biomed Mater       Date:  2009-09-23       Impact factor: 3.715

View more
  5 in total

1.  Templated freezing: a simple method may increase gripping force of the clamp on the tendon.

Authors:  T Wang; H Yu
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2022-06-15       Impact factor: 2.677

2.  Biphasic Double-Network Hydrogel With Compartmentalized Loading of Bioactive Glass for Osteochondral Defect Repair.

Authors:  Bingchuan Liu; Yanran Zhao; Tengjiao Zhu; Shan Gao; Kaifeng Ye; Fang Zhou; Dong Qiu; Xing Wang; Yun Tian; Xiaozhong Qu
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2020-07-02

3.  Fabrication and characterization of PHEMA-gelatin scaffold enriched with graphene oxide for bone tissue engineering.

Authors:  Sara Tabatabaee; Nafiseh Baheiraei; Mojdeh Salehnia
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2022-04-09       Impact factor: 2.359

Review 4.  Applying extrusion-based 3D printing technique accelerates fabricating complex biphasic calcium phosphate-based scaffolds for bone tissue regeneration.

Authors:  Nima Beheshtizadeh; Mahmoud Azami; Hossein Abbasi; Ali Farzin
Journal:  J Adv Res       Date:  2021-12-28       Impact factor: 12.822

Review 5.  Bioactive Glasses: From Parent 45S5 Composition to Scaffold-Assisted Tissue-Healing Therapies.

Authors:  Elisa Fiume; Jacopo Barberi; Enrica Verné; Francesco Baino
Journal:  J Funct Biomater       Date:  2018-03-16
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.