Literature DB >> 23438862

Mechanical properties of bioactive glass (13-93) scaffolds fabricated by robotic deposition for structural bone repair.

Xin Liu1, Mohamed N Rahaman, Gregory E Hilmas, B Sonny Bal.   

Abstract

There is a need to develop synthetic scaffolds to repair large defects in load-bearing bones. Bioactive glasses have attractive properties as a scaffold material for bone repair, but data on their mechanical properties are limited. The objective of the present study was to comprehensively evaluate the mechanical properties of strong porous scaffolds of silicate 13-93 bioactive glass fabricated by robocasting. As-fabricated scaffolds with a grid-like microstructure (porosity 47%, filament diameter 330μm, pore width 300μm) were tested in compressive and flexural loading to determine their strength, elastic modulus, Weibull modulus, fatigue resistance, and fracture toughness. Scaffolds were also tested in compression after they were immersed in simulated body fluid (SBF) in vitro or implanted in a rat subcutaneous model in vivo. As fabricated, the scaffolds had a strength of 86±9MPa, elastic modulus of 13±2GPa, and a Weibull modulus of 12 when tested in compression. In flexural loading the strength, elastic modulus, and Weibull modulus were 11±3MPa, 13±2GPa, and 6, respectively. In compression, the as-fabricated scaffolds had a mean fatigue life of ∼10(6) cycles when tested in air at room temperature or in phosphate-buffered saline at 37°C under cyclic stresses of 1-10 or 2-20MPa. The compressive strength of the scaffolds decreased markedly during the first 2weeks of immersion in SBF or implantation in vivo, but more slowly thereafter. The brittle mechanical response of the scaffolds in vitro changed to an elasto-plastic response after implantation for longer than 2-4weeks in vivo. In addition to providing critically needed data for designing bioactive glass scaffolds, the results are promising for the application of these strong porous scaffolds in loaded bone repair.
Copyright © 2013 Acta Materialia Inc. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23438862      PMCID: PMC3654023          DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2013.02.026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Biomater        ISSN: 1742-7061            Impact factor:   8.947


  36 in total

1.  Mechanical properties and cytocompatibility of poly(ε-caprolactone)-infiltrated biphasic calcium phosphate scaffolds with bimodal pore distribution.

Authors:  Marianna Peroglio; Laurent Gremillard; Catherine Gauthier; Laurent Chazeau; Sophie Verrier; Mauro Alini; Jérôme Chevalier
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2010-05-27       Impact factor: 8.947

Review 2.  Bone graft substitutes.

Authors:  Cato Laurencin; Yusuf Khan; Saadiq F El-Amin
Journal:  Expert Rev Med Devices       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 3.166

3.  Bioactive borosilicate glass scaffolds: in vitro degradation and bioactivity behaviors.

Authors:  Xin Liu; Wenhai Huang; Hailuo Fu; Aihua Yao; Deping Wang; Haobo Pan; William W Lu; Xinquan Jiang; Xiuli Zhang
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2009-01-29       Impact factor: 3.896

Review 4.  Review of bioactive glass: from Hench to hybrids.

Authors:  Julian R Jones
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2012-08-21       Impact factor: 8.947

5.  In vitro transformation of bioactive glass granules into Ca-P shells.

Authors:  S Radin; P Ducheyne; S Falaize; A Hammond
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res       Date:  2000-02

6.  Silicate, borosilicate, and borate bioactive glass scaffolds with controllable degradation rate for bone tissue engineering applications. I. Preparation and in vitro degradation.

Authors:  Qiang Fu; Mohamed N Rahaman; Hailuo Fu; Xin Liu
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res A       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 4.396

7.  The effect of femoral stem cross-sectional geometry on cement stresses in total hip reconstruction.

Authors:  R D Crowninshield; R A Brand; R C Johnston; J C Milroy
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1980 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Bioactive glass scaffolds for bone tissue engineering: state of the art and future perspectives.

Authors:  Qiang Fu; Eduardo Saiz; Mohamed N Rahaman; Antoni P Tomsia
Journal:  Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl       Date:  2011-10-10       Impact factor: 7.328

Review 9.  A review of the mechanical behavior of CaP and CaP/polymer composites for applications in bone replacement and repair.

Authors:  Amy J Wagoner Johnson; Brad A Herschler
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2010-07-21       Impact factor: 8.947

10.  Micro-CT studies on 3-D bioactive glass-ceramic scaffolds for bone regeneration.

Authors:  Chiara Renghini; Vladimir Komlev; Fabrizio Fiori; Enrica Verné; Francesco Baino; Chiara Vitale-Brovarone
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2008-11-07       Impact factor: 8.947

View more
  21 in total

1.  A porous polymeric-hydroxyapatite scaffold used for femur fractures treatment: fabrication, analysis, and simulation.

Authors:  Saeid Esmaeili; Hossein Akbari Aghdam; Mehdi Motififard; Saeed Saber-Samandari; Amir Hussein Montazeran; Mohammad Bigonah; Erfan Sheikhbahaei; Amirsalar Khandan
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2019-08-16

2.  Cellular Response to 3-D Printed Bioactive Silicate and Borosilicate Glass Scaffolds.

Authors:  Weitao Jia; Grace Y Lau; Wenhai Huang; Changqing Zhang; Antoni P Tomsia; Qiang Fu
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater       Date:  2018-09-08       Impact factor: 3.368

Review 3.  Scaffold design for bone regeneration.

Authors:  Liliana Polo-Corrales; Magda Latorre-Esteves; Jaime E Ramirez-Vick
Journal:  J Nanosci Nanotechnol       Date:  2014-01

4.  Tough and strong porous bioactive glass-PLA composites for structural bone repair.

Authors:  Wei Xiao; Mohsen Asle Zaeem; Guangda Li; B Sonny Bal; Mohamed N Rahaman
Journal:  J Mater Sci       Date:  2017-01-17       Impact factor: 4.220

5.  Strength, toughness, and reliability of a porous glass/biopolymer composite scaffold.

Authors:  Qiang Fu; Weitao Jia; Grace Y Lau; Antoni P Tomsia
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater       Date:  2017-06-01       Impact factor: 3.368

6.  Compressive fatigue and fracture toughness behavior of injectable, settable bone cements.

Authors:  Andrew J Harmata; Sasidhar Uppuganti; Mathilde Granke; Scott A Guelcher; Jeffry S Nyman
Journal:  J Mech Behav Biomed Mater       Date:  2015-08-01

7.  Enhanced bone regeneration in rat calvarial defects implanted with surface-modified and BMP-loaded bioactive glass (13-93) scaffolds.

Authors:  Xin Liu; Mohamed N Rahaman; Yongxing Liu; B Sonny Bal; Lynda F Bonewald
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2013-04-06       Impact factor: 8.947

8.  Tubular Scaffold with Shape Recovery Effect for Cell Guide Applications.

Authors:  Kazi M Zakir Hossain; Chenkai Zhu; Reda M Felfel; Nusrat Sharmin; Ifty Ahmed
Journal:  J Funct Biomater       Date:  2015-07-10

9.  Design and Fabrication of 3D printed Scaffolds with a Mechanical Strength Comparable to Cortical Bone to Repair Large Bone Defects.

Authors:  Seyed-Iman Roohani-Esfahani; Peter Newman; Hala Zreiqat
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-01-19       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 10.  Bioceramics and Scaffolds: A Winning Combination for Tissue Engineering.

Authors:  Francesco Baino; Giorgia Novajra; Chiara Vitale-Brovarone
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2015-12-17
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.