Literature DB >> 21725264

Verification of computed tomographic estimates of cochlear implant array position: a micro-CT and histologic analysis.

Jessica Teymouri1, Timothy E Hullar, Timothy A Holden, Richard A Chole.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the efficacy of clinical computed tomographic (CT) imaging to verify postoperative electrode array placement in cochlear implant (CI) patients. STUDY
DESIGN: Nine fresh cadaver heads underwent clinical CT scanning, followed by bilateral CI insertion and postoperative clinical CT scanning. Temporal bones were removed, trimmed, and scanned using micro-CT. Specimens were then dehydrated, embedded in either methyl methacrylate or LR White resin, and sectioned with a diamond wafering saw. Histology sections were examined by 3 blinded observers to determine the position of individual electrodes relative to soft tissue structures within the cochlea. Electrodes were judged to be within the scala tympani, scala vestibuli, or in an intermediate position between scalae.
RESULTS: The position of the array could be estimated accurately from clinical CT scans in all specimens using micro-CT and histology as a criterion standard. Verification using micro-CT yielded 97% agreement, and histologic analysis revealed 95% agreement with clinical CT results.
CONCLUSION: A composite, 3-dimensional image derived from a patient's preoperative and postoperative CT images using a clinical scanner accurately estimates the position of the electrode array as determined by micro-CT imaging and histologic analyses. Information obtained using the CT method provides valuable insight into numerous variables of interest to patient performance such as surgical technique, array design, and processor programming and troubleshooting.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21725264      PMCID: PMC3173021          DOI: 10.1097/MAO.0b013e3182255915

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Otol Neurotol        ISSN: 1531-7129            Impact factor:   2.311


  30 in total

1.  Cochlear view: postoperative radiography for cochlear implantation.

Authors:  J Xu; S A Xu; L T Cohen; G M Clark
Journal:  Am J Otol       Date:  2000-01

2.  Cochlear implants: three-dimensional localization by means of coregistration of CT and conventional radiographs.

Authors:  B R Whiting; K T Bae; M W Skinner
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  Electrophysiologic effects of placing cochlear implant electrodes in a perimodiolar position in young children.

Authors:  Phillip A Wackym; Jill B Firszt; Wolfgang Gaggl; Christina L Runge-Samuelson; Ruth M Reeder; Jennifer C Raulie
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 3.325

4.  Imaging the intact guinea pig tympanic bulla by orthogonal-plane fluorescence optical sectioning microscopy.

Authors:  Arne H Voie
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 3.208

5.  Conservation of low-frequency hearing in cochlear implantation.

Authors:  Jan Kiefer; Wolfgang Gstoettner; Wolfgang Baumgartner; Stephan Marcel Pok; Jochen Tillein; Qing Ye; Christoph von Ilberg
Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 1.494

6.  Factors associated with incomplete insertion of electrodes in cochlear implant surgery: a histopathologic study.

Authors:  Joonhan Lee; Joseph B Nadol; Donald K Eddington
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2010-06-19       Impact factor: 1.854

7.  Preservation of hearing in cochlear implant surgery: advantages of combined electrical and acoustical speech processing.

Authors:  Bruce J Gantz; Christopher Turner; Kate E Gfeller; Mary W Lowder
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 3.325

8.  A temporal bone study of insertion trauma and intracochlear position of cochlear implant electrodes. I: Comparison of Nucleus banded and Nucleus Contour electrodes.

Authors:  Peter Wardrop; David Whinney; Stephen J Rebscher; J Thomas Roland; William Luxford; Patricia A Leake
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 3.208

9.  CT-derived estimation of cochlear morphology and electrode array position in relation to word recognition in Nucleus-22 recipients.

Authors:  Margaret W Skinner; Darlene R Ketten; Laura K Holden; Gary W Harding; Peter G Smith; George A Gates; J Gail Neely; G Robert Kletzker; Barry Brunsden; Barbara Blocker
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2002-02-27

10.  In vivo measures of cochlear length and insertion depth of nucleus cochlear implant electrode arrays.

Authors:  D R Ketten; M W Skinner; G Wang; M W Vannier; G A Gates; J G Neely
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl       Date:  1998-11
View more
  23 in total

1.  Correlation between histologic and radiographic reconstruction of intracochlear electrode position in human temporal bones.

Authors:  Jennifer T O'Malley; Barbara J Burgess; Meng-Yu Zhu; Hugh D Curtin; Joseph B Nadol
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2014-03-27       Impact factor: 1.854

2.  High-resolution secondary reconstructions with the use of flat panel CT in the clinical assessment of patients with cochlear implants.

Authors:  M S Pearl; A Roy; C J Limb
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2013-12-26       Impact factor: 3.825

3.  Mammalian Cochlear Hair Cell Imaging Using Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT): A Preliminary Study.

Authors:  Sung-Won Choi; Jieun Kang; Seokhwan Lee; Se-Joon Oh; Hongki Kim; Soo-Keun Kong
Journal:  J Int Adv Otol       Date:  2021-01       Impact factor: 1.017

4.  Psychophysical Tuning Curves as a Correlate of Electrode Position in Cochlear Implant Listeners.

Authors:  Lindsay DeVries; Julie G Arenberg
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2018-06-04

5.  Reliability of cone beam computed tomography in scalar localization of the electrode array: a radio histological study.

Authors:  Mathieu Marx; Frank Risi; Bernard Escudé; Irfan Durmo; Christopher James; Frédéric Lauwers; Olivier Deguine; Bernard Fraysse
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2013-03-28       Impact factor: 2.503

6.  Examining the electro-neural interface of cochlear implant users using psychophysics, CT scans, and speech understanding.

Authors:  Christopher J Long; Timothy A Holden; Gary H McClelland; Wendy S Parkinson; Clough Shelton; David C Kelsall; Zachary M Smith
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2014-01-30

7.  Assessing the Electrode-Neuron Interface with the Electrically Evoked Compound Action Potential, Electrode Position, and Behavioral Thresholds.

Authors:  Lindsay DeVries; Rachel Scheperle; Julie Arenberg Bierer
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2016-02-29

8.  Effects of Electrode Location on Estimates of Neural Health in Humans with Cochlear Implants.

Authors:  Kara C Schvartz-Leyzac; Timothy A Holden; Teresa A Zwolan; H Alexander Arts; Jill B Firszt; Christopher J Buswinka; Bryan E Pfingst
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2020-04-27

9.  Factors Affecting Outcomes in Cochlear Implant Recipients Implanted With a Perimodiolar Electrode Array Located in Scala Tympani.

Authors:  Laura K Holden; Jill B Firszt; Ruth M Reeder; Rosalie M Uchanski; Noël Y Dwyer; Timothy A Holden
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 2.311

10.  Factors affecting open-set word recognition in adults with cochlear implants.

Authors:  Laura K Holden; Charles C Finley; Jill B Firszt; Timothy A Holden; Christine Brenner; Lisa G Potts; Brenda D Gotter; Sallie S Vanderhoof; Karen Mispagel; Gitry Heydebrand; Margaret W Skinner
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2013 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.570

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.