Literature DB >> 24371026

High-resolution secondary reconstructions with the use of flat panel CT in the clinical assessment of patients with cochlear implants.

M S Pearl1, A Roy2, C J Limb3.   

Abstract

Radiologic assessment of cochlear implants can be limited because of metallic streak artifacts and the high attenuation of the temporal bones. We report on 14 patients with 18 cochlear implants (17 Med-El standard 31.5-mm arrays, 1 Med-El medium 24-mm array) who underwent flat panel CT with the use of high-resolution secondary reconstruction techniques. Flat panel CT depicted the insertion site, cochlear implant course, and all 216 individual electrode contacts. The calculated mean angular insertion depth for standard arrays was 591.9° (SD = 70.9; range, 280°). High-resolution secondary reconstructions of the initial flat panel CT dataset, by use of a manually generated field of view, Hounsfield unit kernel type, and sharp image characteristics, provided high-quality images with improved spatial resolution. Flat panel CT is a promising imaging tool for the postoperative evaluation of cochlear implant placement.
© 2014 by American Journal of Neuroradiology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24371026      PMCID: PMC7965126          DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A3814

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol        ISSN: 0195-6108            Impact factor:   3.825


  18 in total

1.  Cochlear implants: three-dimensional localization by means of coregistration of CT and conventional radiographs.

Authors:  B R Whiting; K T Bae; M W Skinner
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  Scalar localization of the electrode array after cochlear implantation: a cadaveric validation study comparing 64-slice multidetector computed tomography with microcomputed tomography.

Authors:  John I Lane; Colin L W Driscoll; Robert J Witte; Andrew Primak; Edward P Lindell
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 2.311

3.  Cone beam computed tomography, a low-dose imaging technique in the postoperative assessment of cochlear implantation.

Authors:  Joana Ruivo; Koen Mermuys; Klaus Bacher; Rudolf Kuhweide; Erwin Offeciers; Jan W Casselman
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 2.311

4.  Imaging of cochlear implant electrode array with flat-detector CT and conventional multislice CT: comparison of image quality and radiation dose.

Authors:  Tobias Struffert; Victoria Hertel; Yannis Kyriakou; Jens Krause; Tobias Engelhorn; Bernhard Schick; Heinrich Iro; Joachim Hornung; Arnd Doerfler
Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 1.494

5.  Improved and simplified methods for specifying positions of the electrode bands of a cochlear implant array.

Authors:  L T Cohen; J Xu; S A Xu; G M Clark
Journal:  Am J Otol       Date:  1996-11

6.  In vivo measurements of the insertion depth of cochlear implant arrays using flat-panel volume computed tomography.

Authors:  Annett Trieger; Anja Schulze; Matthias Schneider; Thomas Zahnert; Dirk Mürbe
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 2.311

Review 7.  Facial nerve stimulation from cochlear implants.

Authors:  D C Bigelow; D J Kay; K O Rafter; M Montes; G W Knox; D M Yousem
Journal:  Am J Otol       Date:  1998-03

8.  Role of electrode placement as a contributor to variability in cochlear implant outcomes.

Authors:  Charles C Finley; Timothy A Holden; Laura K Holden; Bruce R Whiting; Richard A Chole; Gail J Neely; Timothy E Hullar; Margaret W Skinner
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 2.311

9.  Determination of the position of nucleus cochlear implant electrodes in the inner ear.

Authors:  M W Skinner; D R Ketten; M W Vannier; G A Gates; R L Yoffie; W A Kalender
Journal:  Am J Otol       Date:  1994-09

10.  Imaging of electrode position in relation to electrode functioning after cochlear implantation.

Authors:  Gijs K A van Wermeskerken; Adriaan F van Olphen; Kees Graamans
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2009-03-24       Impact factor: 2.503

View more
  16 in total

1.  Effects of interaural pitch matching and auditory image centering on binaural sensitivity in cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Alan Kan; Ruth Y Litovsky; Matthew J Goupell
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2015 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.570

2.  Validating a New Tablet-based Tool in the Determination of Cochlear Implant Angular Insertion Depth.

Authors:  Michael W Canfarotta; Margaret T Dillon; Emily Buss; Harold C Pillsbury; Kevin D Brown; Brendan P O'Connell
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 2.311

3.  Radiological evaluation of inner ear trauma after cochlear implant surgery by cone beam CT(CBCT).

Authors:  Tougan Taha Abd El Aziz; Lobna El Fiky; Mennatallah Hatem Shalaby; Ahmed Essam
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2019-06-13       Impact factor: 2.503

4.  The Effect of Simulated Interaural Frequency Mismatch on Speech Understanding and Spatial Release From Masking.

Authors:  Matthew J Goupell; Corey A Stoelb; Alan Kan; Ruth Y Litovsky
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2018 Sep/Oct       Impact factor: 3.570

5.  Visualizing the 3D cytoarchitecture of the human cochlea in an intact temporal bone using synchrotron radiation phase contrast imaging.

Authors:  Janani S Iyer; Ning Zhu; Sergei Gasilov; Hanif M Ladak; Sumit K Agrawal; Konstantina M Stankovic
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2018-07-18       Impact factor: 3.732

6.  Cone-beam CT versus Multidetector CT in Postoperative Cochlear Implant Imaging: Evaluation of Image Quality and Radiation Dose.

Authors:  R A Helal; R Jacob; M A Elshinnawy; A I Othman; I M Al-Dhamari; D W Paulus; T T Abdelaziz
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2021-01-07       Impact factor: 3.825

7.  Imaging cochlear implantation with round window insertion in human temporal bones and cochlear morphological variation using high-resolution cone beam CT.

Authors:  Jing Zou; Jaakko Lähelmä; Juha Koivisto; Anandhan Dhanasingh; Claude Jolly; Antti Aarnisalo; Jan Wolff; Ilmari Pyykkö
Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol       Date:  2015-02-13       Impact factor: 1.494

8.  Validation of a Cochlear Implant Patient-Specific Model of the Voltage Distribution in a Clinical Setting.

Authors:  Waldo Nogueira; Daniel Schurzig; Andreas Büchner; Richard T Penninger; Waldemar Würfel
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2016-11-23

9.  Vestibular Implant Imaging.

Authors:  A Hedjoudje; D P Schoo; B K Ward; J P Carey; C C Della Santina; M Pearl
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2020-12-24       Impact factor: 3.825

10.  The impact of round window vs cochleostomy surgical approaches on interscalar excursions in the cochlea: Preliminary results from a flat-panel computed tomography study.

Authors:  Nicole T Jiam; Charles J Limb
Journal:  World J Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2016-11-24
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.