Literature DB >> 24686209

Correlation between histologic and radiographic reconstruction of intracochlear electrode position in human temporal bones.

Jennifer T O'Malley1, Barbara J Burgess, Meng-Yu Zhu, Hugh D Curtin, Joseph B Nadol.   

Abstract

In our laboratory, human temporal bone specimens from patients who in life have undergone cochlear implantation are routinely processed with the implant in situ, embedded in Araldite, sectioned at 20 µm and serially photographed during cutting, stained with toluidine blue and mounted on glass slides. From the images, two-dimensional and three-dimensional reconstructions can be made and a very accurate implant insertion depth can be calculated from the three-dimensional reconstructions. However, this method precludes subsequent special stains and further molecular investigations of the tissue including proteomics and immunostaining, which is now possible with celloidin-embedded tissue. In this study, we correlated measurement of the implant array insertion depth calculated from histologic three-dimensional reconstruction with that measured from three-dimensional radiologic multiplanar reconstruction. Four human temporal bones with cochlear implants underwent postfixation preprocessing CT imaging with a Siemens Somatom Sensation Scanner. The CT scans from these four bones were downloaded into the Voxar software application, reformatted using the multiplanar reconstruction tool, viewed in three dimensions and measurements of intracochlear insertion lengths of the implants were obtained. The bones were processed routinely for in situ Araldite embedding, serial images were made of the block during sectioning, postprocessed using PV-Wave® software, aligned with Amira® software, and used to create histologic three-dimensional reconstructions. From these three-dimensional reconstructions, the insertion depth of the electrode array was mathematically calculated. The range of insertion depths was 15.9 mm (case 1) to 26.6 mm (case 4). The two methods, radiographic multiplanar reconstruction and three-dimensional reconstruction, differed by 0.4-0.9%. This provides confidence that important localization information about the electrode in situ can be gleaned from CT scans, thereby allowing us to extract the implants prior to processing for celloidin embedment and allow further techniques such as special stains and immunostaining to be accomplished in order to evaluate molecular mechanisms involved in cochlear implantation.
© 2014 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24686209      PMCID: PMC4123416          DOI: 10.1159/000358003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Audiol Neurootol        ISSN: 1420-3030            Impact factor:   1.854


  23 in total

1.  Immunohistochemistry of lymphocytes and macrophages in human celloidin-embedded temporal bone sections with acute otitis media.

Authors:  T Ganbo; I Sando; C D Balaban; C Suzuki; M Sudo
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 1.547

2.  Immunocytochemical localization of the translocase of the outer mitochondrial membrane (Tom20) in the human cochlea.

Authors:  Ashley E Balaker; Paul Ishiyama; Ivan A Lopez; Gail Ishiyama; Akira Ishiyama
Journal:  Anat Rec (Hoboken)       Date:  2012-11-19       Impact factor: 2.064

3.  Histopathology of cochlear implants in humans.

Authors:  J B Nadol; J Y Shiao; B J Burgess; D R Ketten; D K Eddington; B J Gantz; I Kos; P Montandon; N J Coker; J T Roland; J K Shallop
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 1.547

4.  Na,K-ATPase in the cochlear lateral wall of human temporal bones with endolymphatic hydrops.

Authors:  E M Keithley; S Horowitz; M J Ruckenstein
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 1.547

5.  Otopathology in a case of multichannel cochlear implantation.

Authors:  J B Nadol; D R Ketten; B J Burgess
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 3.325

6.  In vivo measures of cochlear length and insertion depth of nucleus cochlear implant electrode arrays.

Authors:  D R Ketten; M W Skinner; G Wang; M W Vannier; G A Gates; J G Neely
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl       Date:  1998-11

7.  Effects of fixative and embedding medium on morphology and immunostaining of the cochlea.

Authors:  Jennifer T O'Malley; Saumil N Merchant; Barbara J Burgess; Diane D Jones; Joe C Adams
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2008-10-01       Impact factor: 1.854

8.  Optimal cochlear implant insertion vectors.

Authors:  Xenia Meshik; Timothy A Holden; Richard A Chole; Timothy E Hullar
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 2.311

9.  Technical report: immunofluorescence and TUNEL staining of celloidin embedded human temporal bone tissues.

Authors:  Adam Markaryan; Erik G Nelson; Maria Tretiakova; Raul Hinojosa
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2008-05-07       Impact factor: 3.208

10.  Quantitative evaluation of new bone and fibrous tissue in the cochlea following cochlear implantation in the human.

Authors:  Mehmet A Somdas; Peter M M C Li; Darren M Whiten; Donald K Eddington; Joseph B Nadol
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2007-05-23       Impact factor: 1.854

View more
  1 in total

1.  Delayed loss of hearing after hearing preservation cochlear implantation: Human temporal bone pathology and implications for etiology.

Authors:  Alicia M Quesnel; Hideko Heidi Nakajima; John J Rosowski; Marlan R Hansen; Bruce J Gantz; Joseph B Nadol
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2015-09-01       Impact factor: 3.208

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.