Literature DB >> 9826942

In vivo measures of cochlear length and insertion depth of nucleus cochlear implant electrode arrays.

D R Ketten1, M W Skinner, G Wang, M W Vannier, G A Gates, J G Neely.   

Abstract

Three-dimensional cochlear canal lengths, electrode array intracochlear insertion depths, and characteristic frequency ranges were estimated for 20 Nucleus implant recipients on the basis of in vivo computed tomography (CT) scans. Ultra-high resolution images were reconstructed from spiral CT data with 0.1-mm slicing and expanded attenuation scales. Canal length estimates (mean 33.01 mm; SD 2.31) were consistent with previous findings for normal human temporal bones. Intracochlear array insertion depths estimated by 3-dimensional (3-D) spiral calculations (mean 20.19 mm; SD 2.86) and by a computerized array tracking algorithm (mean 20.36 mm; SD 2.66) were not significantly different. Estimates from surgical observations were significantly longer (mean 21.03 mm; SD 2.31) because array compressions were not detectable. Characteristic frequencies at apical electrodes estimated from Greenwood's equations ranged from 387 Hz to 2,596 Hz. The results show that significant variations in cochlear anatomy and array distribution among implant patients that may impact implant performance can be reliably detected and quantified by using in vivo high-resolution CT and 3-D reconstructions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9826942

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl        ISSN: 0096-8056


  71 in total

1.  Perceptual "vowel spaces" of cochlear implant users: implications for the study of auditory adaptation to spectral shift.

Authors:  J D Harnsberger; M A Svirsky; A R Kaiser; D B Pisoni; R Wright; T A Meyer
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Current and planned cochlear implant research at New York University Laboratory for Translational Auditory Research.

Authors:  Mario A Svirsky; Matthew B Fitzgerald; Arlene Neuman; Elad Sagi; Chin-Tuan Tan; Darlene Ketten; Brett Martin
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 1.664

3.  Electrode insertion depth in cochlear implantees estimated during surgery, on plain film radiographs and with electrode function testing.

Authors:  Robert H R Bettman; Adriaan F van Olphen; Frans W Zonneveld; Egbert H Huizing
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2003-05-23       Impact factor: 2.503

4.  Correlation between histologic and radiographic reconstruction of intracochlear electrode position in human temporal bones.

Authors:  Jennifer T O'Malley; Barbara J Burgess; Meng-Yu Zhu; Hugh D Curtin; Joseph B Nadol
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2014-03-27       Impact factor: 1.854

5.  Multisection CT as a valuable tool in the postoperative assessment of cochlear implant patients.

Authors:  Berit M Verbist; Johan H M Frijns; Jakob Geleijns; Mark A van Buchem
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 3.825

6.  Predicting the effect of post-implant cochlear fibrosis on residual hearing.

Authors:  Chul-Hee Choi; John S Oghalai
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 3.208

7.  Perceptual adaptation to spectrally shifted vowels: training with nonlexical labels.

Authors:  Tianhao Li; Qian-Jie Fu
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2006-11-28

8.  A frequency-position function for the human cochlear spiral ganglion.

Authors:  Divya Sridhar; Olga Stakhovskaya; Patricia A Leake
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2006-10-06       Impact factor: 1.854

9.  Frequency map for the human cochlear spiral ganglion: implications for cochlear implants.

Authors:  Olga Stakhovskaya; Divya Sridhar; Ben H Bonham; Patricia A Leake
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2007-02-21

10.  Role of electrode placement as a contributor to variability in cochlear implant outcomes.

Authors:  Charles C Finley; Timothy A Holden; Laura K Holden; Bruce R Whiting; Richard A Chole; Gail J Neely; Timothy E Hullar; Margaret W Skinner
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 2.311

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.