Literature DB >> 10651435

Cochlear view: postoperative radiography for cochlear implantation.

J Xu1, S A Xu, L T Cohen, G M Clark.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to define a spatial position of the cochlea in the skull based on anatomical studies and to design an appropriate method of skull radiography for demonstration of the multichannel intracochlear electrode array and the structures of the inner ear, for use in evaluating the electrode position and its related pitch perception.
BACKGROUND: The conventional skull radiograph (plain radiograph) can offer a complete and direct image of an intracochlear electrode array, if the x-ray is directed to the cochlea and parallel to the axis of the cochlea.
METHODS: Measurement from computed tomography imaging and three-dimensional reconstruction were performed to define the spatial position of the cochlea in the skull.
RESULTS: A radiographic projection, the cochlear view, was designed. A detailed radiographic method and radiologic interpretation of the cochlear view is described. An improved clinical method for measuring the longitudinal and angular position of the electrodes from the cochlear view is recommended.
CONCLUSIONS: The application of the cochlear view has proved that it is beneficial postoperatively in documenting the results of cochlear implantation, and in evaluating the depth of insertion and position of individual electrodes. It serves as a valuable reference for managing frequency mapping, optimizing speech processing strategies, and further research purposes. The method can be widely used in cochlear implant clinics because of its simplicity, low radiation, speed, and minimal cost.

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10651435

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Otol        ISSN: 0192-9763


  65 in total

1.  Controlling the position and the dislocation of the middle ear transducer with high-resolution computed tomography and digital volume tomography: implications for the transducers' design.

Authors:  Georgios Kontorinis; Anja M Giesemann; Thomas Witt; Friedrich Goetz; Burkard Schwab
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2011-09-22       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  Complication of cochlear implantation surgery.

Authors:  Michael A Mecca; William Wagle; Allison Lupinetti; Steven Parnes
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2003 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.825

3.  Multisection CT as a valuable tool in the postoperative assessment of cochlear implant patients.

Authors:  Berit M Verbist; Johan H M Frijns; Jakob Geleijns; Mark A van Buchem
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 3.825

4.  Implications of deep electrode insertion on cochlear implant fitting.

Authors:  Mathieu Gani; Gregory Valentini; Alain Sigrist; Maria-Izabel Kós; Colette Boëx
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2007-01-11

5.  Frequency map for the human cochlear spiral ganglion: implications for cochlear implants.

Authors:  Olga Stakhovskaya; Divya Sridhar; Ben H Bonham; Patricia A Leake
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2007-02-21

6.  Intracochlear assessment of electrode position after cochlear implant surgery by means of multislice computer tomography.

Authors:  Gijs K A van Wermeskerken; Mathias Prokop; Adriaan F van Olphen; Frans W J Albers
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2007-07-14       Impact factor: 2.503

7.  Psychophysical versus physiological spatial forward masking and the relation to speech perception in cochlear implants.

Authors:  Michelle L Hughes; Lisa J Stille
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 3.570

8.  [Cochlear implants in isolated temporal bones: evaluation of electrode position with 64-slice computed tomography].

Authors:  J H Wagner; G Rademacher; A Ernst; I Todt
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 1.284

9.  Initial Operative Experience and Short-term Hearing Preservation Results With a Mid-scala Cochlear Implant Electrode Array.

Authors:  Maja Svrakic; J Thomas Roland; Sean O McMenomey; Mario A Svirsky
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 2.311

10.  Role of electrode placement as a contributor to variability in cochlear implant outcomes.

Authors:  Charles C Finley; Timothy A Holden; Laura K Holden; Bruce R Whiting; Richard A Chole; Gail J Neely; Timothy E Hullar; Margaret W Skinner
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 2.311

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.