D Muenzel1, P B Noel, F Dorn, M Dobritz, E J Rummeny, A Huber. 1. Department of Radiology, Klinikum rechts der Isar der Technischen Universität München, Ismaninger Strasse 22, 81675 Munich, Germany. muenzel@tum.de
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of heart rate variability (HRV) and heart rate (HR) on intra-image "motion" and inter-image "stairstep" artefacts in step-and-shoot coronary CT angiography (CCTA) using a wide detector CT scanner. METHODS: 66 patients underwent step-and-shoot CCTA using 256-slice CT. Patients were divided into two groups (Group 1: HR <65 bpm, Group 2 ≥65bpm). Motion artefacts were quantified using a 5-point-scale. Stairstep artefacts were defined by measurements of misalignment. Image noise, contrast-to-noise-ratio (CNR), signal-to-noise-ratio (SNR), and radiation dose were assessed. RESULTS: Mean HR was 66 ± 16.7 bpm (range: 45-125 bpm) and mean HRV was 10.7 ± 17.5 bpm. A significant correlation between HR and stairstep artefacts (r = 0.46, p < 0.001) and motion artefacts (r = 0.63, p < 0.001) was found. Group 2 showed significantly increased step artefacts with a mean misalignment of 1.4 mm compared to 0.4 mm in Group 1 (p < 0.001). There was no significant effect of HRV on stairstep artefacts (r = 0.15, p = 0.416) and motion artefacts (r = 0.13, p = 0.311). No significant differences in image noise, CNR, SNR, and radiation dose were seen. CONCLUSIONS: Unlike CCTA using narrow CT detectors, HRV has no significant effect on motion and stairstep artefacts using a wide CT detector with high z-coverage. However, a higher HR still increases stairstep and motion artefacts.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of heart rate variability (HRV) and heart rate (HR) on intra-image "motion" and inter-image "stairstep" artefacts in step-and-shoot coronary CT angiography (CCTA) using a wide detector CT scanner. METHODS: 66 patients underwent step-and-shoot CCTA using 256-slice CT. Patients were divided into two groups (Group 1: HR <65 bpm, Group 2 ≥65bpm). Motion artefacts were quantified using a 5-point-scale. Stairstep artefacts were defined by measurements of misalignment. Image noise, contrast-to-noise-ratio (CNR), signal-to-noise-ratio (SNR), and radiation dose were assessed. RESULTS: Mean HR was 66 ± 16.7 bpm (range: 45-125 bpm) and mean HRV was 10.7 ± 17.5 bpm. A significant correlation between HR and stairstep artefacts (r = 0.46, p < 0.001) and motion artefacts (r = 0.63, p < 0.001) was found. Group 2 showed significantly increased step artefacts with a mean misalignment of 1.4 mm compared to 0.4 mm in Group 1 (p < 0.001). There was no significant effect of HRV on stairstep artefacts (r = 0.15, p = 0.416) and motion artefacts (r = 0.13, p = 0.311). No significant differences in image noise, CNR, SNR, and radiation dose were seen. CONCLUSIONS: Unlike CCTA using narrow CT detectors, HRV has no significant effect on motion and stairstep artefacts using a wide CT detector with high z-coverage. However, a higher HR still increases stairstep and motion artefacts.
Authors: Bernd J Wintersperger; Konstantin Nikolaou; Franz von Ziegler; Thorsten Johnson; Carsten Rist; Alexander Leber; Thomas Flohr; Andreas Knez; Maximilian F Reiser; Christoph R Becker Journal: Invest Radiol Date: 2006-05 Impact factor: 6.016
Authors: W G Austen; J E Edwards; R L Frye; G G Gensini; V L Gott; L S Griffith; D C McGoon; M L Murphy; B B Roe Journal: Circulation Date: 1975-04 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Sebastian Leschka; Hans Scheffel; Lotus Desbiolles; Andre Plass; Oliver Gaemperli; Ines Valenta; Lars Husmann; Thomas G Flohr; Michele Genoni; Borut Marincek; Philipp A Kaufmann; Hatem Alkadhi Journal: Invest Radiol Date: 2007-08 Impact factor: 6.016
Authors: James P Earls; Elise L Berman; Bruce A Urban; Charlene A Curry; Judith L Lane; Robert S Jennings; Colin C McCulloch; Jiang Hsieh; John H Londt Journal: Radiology Date: 2008-01-14 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Bernhard A Herzog; Lars Husmann; Nina Burkhard; Ines Valenta; Oliver Gaemperli; Fuminari Tatsugami; Christophe A Wyss; Uif Landmesser; Philipp A Kaufmann Journal: Acad Radiol Date: 2009-01 Impact factor: 3.173
Authors: Sang Il Choi; Richard T George; Karl H Schuleri; Eun Ju Chun; Joao A C Lima; Albert C Lardo Journal: Int J Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2009-03-03 Impact factor: 2.357
Authors: Lars Husmann; Bernhard A Herzog; Nina Burkhard; Fuminari Tatsugami; Ines Valenta; Oliver Gaemperli; Christophe A Wyss; Ulf Landmesser; Philipp A Kaufmann Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2009-02-24 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Fleur R de Graaf; Joanne D Schuijf; Joëlla E van Velzen; Lucia J Kroft; Albert de Roos; Johannes H C Reiber; Eric Boersma; Martin J Schalij; Fabrizio Spanó; J Wouter Jukema; Ernst E van der Wall; Jeroen J Bax Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2010-01-04 Impact factor: 29.983
Authors: Matthias S May; Paul Deak; Axel Kuettner; Michael M Lell; Wolfgang Wuest; Michael Scharf; Andrea K Keller; Lothar Häberle; Stephan Achenbach; Martin Seltmann; Michael Uder; Willi A Kalender Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2011-10-09 Impact factor: 5.315