OBJECTIVES: We sought to evaluate the impact of patients' heart rate (HR) on coronary CTA image quality (IQ) and motion artifacts using a 64-slice scanner with 0.33/360 degrees rotation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Coronary CTA data sets of 32 patients (HR <or= 65 beats per minute [bpm], n = 15; HR > 65 bpm to <or=75 bpm, n = 10; HR > 75 bpm, n = 7) examined on a 64-slice scanner (Sensation 64, Siemens Medical Solutions, Forchheim, Germany) with 0.33s/360 degrees gantry rotation speed were analyzed. All patients had suspicion of coronary artery disease. Data acquisition was performed using 64 x 0.6-mm collimation, and contrast enhancement was provided by injection of 80 mL of iopromide (5 mL/s + NaCl). Images were reconstructed throughout the RR interval using half-scan and dual-segment reconstruction. IQ was rated by 2 observers using a 3-point scale from excellent (1) to nondiagnostic (3) for coronary segments. Quality was correlated to the HR, time point of optimal IQ analyzed, and the benefit of dual-segment reconstruction evaluated. RESULTS: Overall mean IQ was 1.31 +/- 0.32 for all HR, with IQ being 1.08 +/- 0.12 for HR <or= 65 bpm, 1.62 +/- 0.27 for HR > 65 bpm <or= 75 bpm and 1.36 +/- 0.31 for HR > 75 bpm (P = 0.0003). Dual-segment reconstruction did not significantly improve IQ in any HR group (P = NS). Mean IQ was significantly better for LAD than for RCA (P < 0.0001) and LCX (P < 0.01). A total of 3.5% (11/318) of coronary artery segments were rated nondiagnostic by at least one reader based on motion artifacts. Although in HR < 65 bpm, the best IQ was predominately in diastole (93%), in HR > 75 bpm, the best IQ shifted to systole in most cases (86%). CONCLUSIONS: Temporal resolution at 0.33-second rotation allows for diagnostic IQ within a wide range of HR using half-scan reconstruction. With increasing HR the time point of best IQ shifts from mid-diastole to systole.
OBJECTIVES: We sought to evaluate the impact of patients' heart rate (HR) on coronary CTA image quality (IQ) and motion artifacts using a 64-slice scanner with 0.33/360 degrees rotation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Coronary CTA data sets of 32 patients (HR <or= 65 beats per minute [bpm], n = 15; HR > 65 bpm to <or=75 bpm, n = 10; HR > 75 bpm, n = 7) examined on a 64-slice scanner (Sensation 64, Siemens Medical Solutions, Forchheim, Germany) with 0.33s/360 degrees gantry rotation speed were analyzed. All patients had suspicion of coronary artery disease. Data acquisition was performed using 64 x 0.6-mm collimation, and contrast enhancement was provided by injection of 80 mL of iopromide (5 mL/s + NaCl). Images were reconstructed throughout the RR interval using half-scan and dual-segment reconstruction. IQ was rated by 2 observers using a 3-point scale from excellent (1) to nondiagnostic (3) for coronary segments. Quality was correlated to the HR, time point of optimal IQ analyzed, and the benefit of dual-segment reconstruction evaluated. RESULTS: Overall mean IQ was 1.31 +/- 0.32 for all HR, with IQ being 1.08 +/- 0.12 for HR <or= 65 bpm, 1.62 +/- 0.27 for HR > 65 bpm <or= 75 bpm and 1.36 +/- 0.31 for HR > 75 bpm (P = 0.0003). Dual-segment reconstruction did not significantly improve IQ in any HR group (P = NS). Mean IQ was significantly better for LAD than for RCA (P < 0.0001) and LCX (P < 0.01). A total of 3.5% (11/318) of coronary artery segments were rated nondiagnostic by at least one reader based on motion artifacts. Although in HR < 65 bpm, the best IQ was predominately in diastole (93%), in HR > 75 bpm, the best IQ shifted to systole in most cases (86%). CONCLUSIONS: Temporal resolution at 0.33-second rotation allows for diagnostic IQ within a wide range of HR using half-scan reconstruction. With increasing HR the time point of best IQ shifts from mid-diastole to systole.
Authors: Thorsten R C Johnson; Konstantin Nikolaou; Bernd J Wintersperger; Alexander W Leber; Franz von Ziegler; Carsten Rist; Sonja Buhmann; Andreas Knez; Maximilian F Reiser; Christoph R Becker Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2006-05-13 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Arthur E Stillman; Matthijs Oudkerk; Margaret Ackerman; Christoph R Becker; Pawel E Buszman; Pim J de Feyter; Udo Hoffmann; Matthew T Keadey; Riccardo Marano; Martin J Lipton; Gilbert L Raff; Gautham P Reddy; Michael R Rees; Geoffrey D Rubin; U Joseph Schoepf; Giuseppe Tarulli; Edwin J R van Beek; Lewis Wexler; Charles S White Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2007-06-05 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Lotus Desbiolles; Sebastian Leschka; André Plass; Hans Scheffel; Lars Husmann; Oliver Gaemperli; Elisabeth Garzoli; Borut Marincek; Philipp A Kaufmann; Hatem Alkadhi Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2007-07-17 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Carsten Rist; T R Johnson; A Becker; A W Leber; A Huber; S Busch; C R Becker; M F Reiser; K Nikolaou Journal: Radiologe Date: 2007-04 Impact factor: 0.635