Literature DB >> 21682414

Spatial tuning curves from apical, middle, and basal electrodes in cochlear implant users.

David A Nelson1, Heather A Kreft, Elizabeth S Anderson, Gail S Donaldson.   

Abstract

Forward-masked psychophysical spatial tuning curves (fmSTCs) were measured in 15 cochlear-implant subjects, 10 using monopolar stimulation and 5 using bipolar stimulation. In each subject, fmSTCs were measured at several probe levels on an apical, middle, and basal electrode using a fixed-level probe stimulus and variable-level maskers. Tuning curve slopes and bandwidths did not change significantly with probe level for electrodes located in the apical, middle, or basal region although a few subjects exhibited dramatic changes in tuning at the extremes of the probe level range. Average tuning curve slopes and bandwidths did not vary significantly across electrode regions. Spatial tuning curves were symmetrical and similar in width across the three electrode regions. However, several subjects demonstrated large changes in slope and/or bandwidth across the three electrode regions, indicating poorer tuning in localized regions of the array. Cochlear-implant users exhibited bandwidths that were approximately five times wider than normal-hearing acoustic listeners but were in the same range as acoustic listeners with moderate cochlear hearing loss. No significant correlations were found between spatial tuning parameters and speech recognition; although a weak relation was seen between middle electrode tuning and transmitted information for vowel second formant frequency.
© 2011 Acoustical Society of America

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21682414      PMCID: PMC3135148          DOI: 10.1121/1.3583503

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  46 in total

1.  Effect of electrode configuration on psychophysical forward masking in cochlear implant listeners.

Authors:  Bom Jun Kwon; Chris van den Honert
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Threshold and channel interaction in cochlear implant users: evaluation of the tripolar electrode configuration.

Authors:  Julie Arenberg Bierer
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Cochlear implant electrode configuration effects on activation threshold and tonotopic selectivity.

Authors:  Russell L Snyder; John C Middlebrooks; Ben H Bonham
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2007-10-11       Impact factor: 3.208

4.  Spatial resolution of cochlear implants: the electrical field and excitation of auditory afferents.

Authors:  A Kral; R Hartmann; D Mortazavi; R Klinke
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 3.208

5.  The nerve-electrode interface of the cochlear implant: current spread.

Authors:  D H Liang; H S Lusted; R L White
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 4.538

6.  Unwrapping Cochlear implants by spiral CT.

Authors:  G Wang; M W Vannier; M W Skinner; W A Kalender; A Polacin; D R Ketten
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 4.538

7.  Linearized response growth inferred from growth-of-masking slopes in ears with cochlear hearing loss.

Authors:  D A Nelson; A C Schroder
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  The CLARION Multi-Strategy Cochlear Implant.

Authors:  D K Kessler
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl       Date:  1999-04

9.  In vivo measures of cochlear length and insertion depth of nucleus cochlear implant electrode arrays.

Authors:  D R Ketten; M W Skinner; G Wang; M W Vannier; G A Gates; J G Neely
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl       Date:  1998-11

10.  Detecting dead regions using psychophysical tuning curves: a comparison of simultaneous and forward masking.

Authors:  Karolina Kluk; Brian C J Moore
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 2.117

View more
  24 in total

1.  Deactivating stimulation sites based on low-rate thresholds improves spectral ripple and speech reception thresholds in cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Ning Zhou
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Psychophysical Tuning Curves as a Correlate of Electrode Position in Cochlear Implant Listeners.

Authors:  Lindsay DeVries; Julie G Arenberg
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2018-06-04

3.  Auditory enhancement and the role of spectral resolution in normal-hearing listeners and cochlear-implant users.

Authors:  Lei Feng; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Modulation frequency discrimination with modulated and unmodulated interference in normal hearing and in cochlear-implant users.

Authors:  Heather A Kreft; David A Nelson; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2013-04-30

5.  Longitudinal effect of deactivating stimulation sites based on low-rate thresholds on speech recognition in cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Ning Zhou
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2019-04-23       Impact factor: 2.117

6.  Relationships Among Peripheral and Central Electrophysiological Measures of Spatial and Spectral Selectivity and Speech Perception in Cochlear Implant Users.

Authors:  Rachel A Scheperle; Paul J Abbas
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2015 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.570

7.  Forward masking patterns by low and high-rate stimulation in cochlear implant users: Differences in masking effectiveness and spread of neural excitation.

Authors:  Ning Zhou; Lixue Dong; Susannah Dixon
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2020-02-15       Impact factor: 3.208

8.  The Effect of Simulated Interaural Frequency Mismatch on Speech Understanding and Spatial Release From Masking.

Authors:  Matthew J Goupell; Corey A Stoelb; Alan Kan; Ruth Y Litovsky
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2018 Sep/Oct       Impact factor: 3.570

9.  Relationship between multipulse integration and speech recognition with cochlear implants.

Authors:  Ning Zhou; Bryan E Pfingst
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  The effect of enhancing temporal periodicity cues on Cantonese tone recognition by cochlear implantees.

Authors:  Tan Lee; Shing Yu; Meng Yuan; Terence Ka Cheong Wong; Ying-Yee Kong
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2014-04-03       Impact factor: 2.117

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.