Literature DB >> 24694089

The effect of enhancing temporal periodicity cues on Cantonese tone recognition by cochlear implantees.

Tan Lee1, Shing Yu, Meng Yuan, Terence Ka Cheong Wong, Ying-Yee Kong.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study investigates the efficacy of a cochlear implant (CI) processing method that enhances temporal periodicity cues of speech.
DESIGN: Subjects participated in word and tone identification tasks. Two processing conditions - the conventional advanced combination encoder (ACE) and tone-enhanced ACE were tested. Test materials were Cantonese disyllabic words recorded from one male and one female speaker. Speech-shaped noise was added to clean speech. The fundamental frequency information for periodicity enhancement was extracted from the clean speech. Electrical stimuli generated from the noisy speech with and without periodicity enhancement were presented via direct stimulation using a Laura 34 research processor. Subjects were asked to identify the presented word. STUDY SAMPLE: Seven post-lingually deafened native Cantonese-speaking CI users.
RESULTS: Percent correct word, segmental structure, and tone identification scores were calculated. While word and segmental structure identification accuracy remained similar between the two processing conditions, tone identification in noise was better with tone-enhanced ACE than with conventional ACE. Significant improvement on tone perception was found only for the female voice.
CONCLUSIONS: Temporal periodicity cues are important to tone perception in noise. Pitch and tone perception by CI users could be improved when listeners received enhanced temporal periodicity cues.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cantonese; Cochlear implant; periodicity enhancement; pitch; tone perception

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24694089      PMCID: PMC4222519          DOI: 10.3109/14992027.2014.893374

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Audiol        ISSN: 1499-2027            Impact factor:   2.117


  46 in total

1.  Chimaeric sounds reveal dichotomies in auditory perception.

Authors:  Zachary M Smith; Bertrand Delgutte; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002-03-07       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Temporal and spectral cues in Mandarin tone recognition.

Authors:  Ying-Yee Kong; Fan-Gang Zeng
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Mandarin tone recognition in cochlear-implant subjects.

Authors:  Chao-Gang Wei; Keli Cao; Fan-Gang Zeng
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 3.208

4.  Processing F0 with cochlear implants: Modulation frequency discrimination and speech intonation recognition.

Authors:  Monita Chatterjee; Shu-Chen Peng
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2007-11-23       Impact factor: 3.208

5.  Improved fundamental frequency coding in cochlear implant signal processing.

Authors:  Matthias Milczynski; Jan Wouters; Astrid van Wieringen
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Better speech recognition with cochlear implants.

Authors:  B S Wilson; C C Finley; D T Lawson; R D Wolford; D K Eddington; W M Rabinowitz
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1991-07-18       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  New cochlear implant coding strategy for tonal language speakers.

Authors:  Lena L N Wong; Andrew E Vandali; Valter Ciocca; Betty Luk; Vivian W K Ip; Brendan Murray; Hip C Yu; Isabella Chung
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 2.117

8.  Effects of spectral shifting on speech perception in noise.

Authors:  Tianhao Li; Qian-Jie Fu
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2010-09-22       Impact factor: 3.208

9.  Frequencies dominant in the perception of the pitch of complex sounds.

Authors:  R J Ritsma
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1967-07       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Enhancing temporal cues to voice pitch in continuous interleaved sampling cochlear implants.

Authors:  Tim Green; Andrew Faulkner; Stuart Rosen
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 1.840

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.