Literature DB >> 28372106

Deactivating stimulation sites based on low-rate thresholds improves spectral ripple and speech reception thresholds in cochlear implant users.

Ning Zhou1.   

Abstract

The study examined whether the benefit of deactivating stimulation sites estimated to have broad neural excitation was attributed to improved spectral resolution in cochlear implant users. The subjects' spatial neural excitation pattern was estimated by measuring low-rate detection thresholds across the array [see Zhou (2016). PLoS One 11, e0165476]. Spectral resolution, as assessed by spectral-ripple discrimination thresholds, significantly improved after deactivation of five high-threshold sites. The magnitude of improvement in spectral-ripple discrimination thresholds predicted the magnitude of improvement in speech reception thresholds after deactivation. Results suggested that a smaller number of relatively independent channels provide a better outcome than using all channels that might interact.

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28372106      PMCID: PMC5724621          DOI: 10.1121/1.4977235

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  20 in total

1.  Psychophysical assessment of spatial spread of excitation in electrical hearing with single and dual electrode contact maskers.

Authors:  J Gertjan Dingemanse; Johan H M Frijns; Jeroen J Briaire
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 3.570

2.  Spectral-ripple resolution correlates with speech reception in noise in cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Jong Ho Won; Ward R Drennan; Jay T Rubinstein
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2007-06-21

3.  The development of a modified spectral ripple test.

Authors:  Justin M Aronoff; David M Landsberger
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Multipolar current focusing increases spectral resolution in cochlear implants.

Authors:  Zachary M Smith; Wendy S Parkinson; Christopher J Long
Journal:  Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc       Date:  2013

5.  Forward masked excitation patterns in multielectrode electrical stimulation.

Authors:  M Chatterjee; R V Shannon
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 6.  Forward masking as a method of measuring place specificity of neural excitation in cochlear implants: a review of methods and interpretation.

Authors:  Colette M McKay
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Examining the electro-neural interface of cochlear implant users using psychophysics, CT scans, and speech understanding.

Authors:  Christopher J Long; Timothy A Holden; Gary H McClelland; Wendy S Parkinson; Clough Shelton; David C Kelsall; Zachary M Smith
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2014-01-30

8.  Patterns of neural degeneration in the human cochlea and auditory nerve: implications for cochlear implantation.

Authors:  J B Nadol
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 3.497

9.  Factors Affecting Outcomes in Cochlear Implant Recipients Implanted With a Perimodiolar Electrode Array Located in Scala Tympani.

Authors:  Laura K Holden; Jill B Firszt; Ruth M Reeder; Rosalie M Uchanski; Noël Y Dwyer; Timothy A Holden
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 2.311

10.  Monopolar Detection Thresholds Predict Spatial Selectivity of Neural Excitation in Cochlear Implants: Implications for Speech Recognition.

Authors:  Ning Zhou
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-10-31       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  29 in total

1.  Comparison of the Spectral-Temporally Modulated Ripple Test With the Arizona Biomedical Institute Sentence Test in Cochlear Implant Users.

Authors:  Marshall Lawler; Jeffrey Yu; Justin M Aronoff
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2017 Nov/Dec       Impact factor: 3.570

2.  Speech Perception with Spectrally Non-overlapping Maskers as Measure of Spectral Resolution in Cochlear Implant Users.

Authors:  Erin R O'Neill; Heather A Kreft; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2018-11-19

3.  Spectral aliasing in an acoustic spectral ripple discrimination task.

Authors:  Jesse M Resnick; David L Horn; Anisha R Noble; Jay T Rubinstein
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Validating a Quick Spectral Modulation Detection Task.

Authors:  David M Landsberger; Robert T Dwyer; Natalia Stupak; René H Gifford
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2019 Nov/Dec       Impact factor: 3.570

5.  Longitudinal effect of deactivating stimulation sites based on low-rate thresholds on speech recognition in cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Ning Zhou
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2019-04-23       Impact factor: 2.117

6.  Forward masking patterns by low and high-rate stimulation in cochlear implant users: Differences in masking effectiveness and spread of neural excitation.

Authors:  Ning Zhou; Lixue Dong; Susannah Dixon
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2020-02-15       Impact factor: 3.208

7.  Spectral-temporally modulated ripple test Lite for computeRless Measurement (SLRM): A Nonlinguistic Test for Audiology Clinics.

Authors:  David M Landsberger; Natalia Stupak; Justin M Aronoff
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2019 Sep/Oct       Impact factor: 3.570

8.  Spectral-Temporal Modulated Ripple Discrimination by Children With Cochlear Implants.

Authors:  David M Landsberger; Monica Padilla; Amy S Martinez; Laurie S Eisenberg
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2018 Jan/Feb       Impact factor: 3.570

9.  Speech recognition as a function of the number of channels for an array with large inter-electrode distances.

Authors:  Katelyn A Berg; Jack H Noble; Benoit M Dawant; Robert T Dwyer; Robert F Labadie; René H Gifford
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2021-04       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  The effect of increased channel interaction on speech perception with cochlear implants.

Authors:  Tobias Goehring; Alan W Archer-Boyd; Julie G Arenberg; Robert P Carlyon
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-05-17       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.