Literature DB >> 17005489

Detecting dead regions using psychophysical tuning curves: a comparison of simultaneous and forward masking.

Karolina Kluk1, Brian C J Moore.   

Abstract

A dead region (DR) is a region of the cochlea where there are no functioning inner hair cells and/or neurones. We compared the edge frequencies, fe, of DRs estimated using four methods: the TEN(HL) test; psychophysical tuning curves (PTCs) measured in simultaneous masking (320-Hz wide noise masker) using a 'fast' method (sweeping masker) and a 'classical' method; and PTCs measured in forward masking (sinusoidal masker) using a 'classical' method. Fourteen subjects with high-frequency DRs were tested. For measurement of PTCs, the signal frequency was chosen to fall inside the DR; the tip frequencies of the PTCs were taken as indicating the values of fe. The values of fe obtained from the PTCs in forward and simultaneous masking (both fast and classical methods) were similar and were usually close to, but somewhat above, the values of fe estimated from the TEN(HL) test. Fast PTCs measured in simultaneous masking are recommended for use in clinical practice, as they give a precise estimate of fe and are quick to administer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17005489     DOI: 10.1080/14992020600753189

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Audiol        ISSN: 1499-2027            Impact factor:   2.117


  11 in total

1.  Using the auditory steady state response to record response amplitude curves. A possible fast objective method for diagnosing dead regions.

Authors:  Timothy Wilding; Colette McKay; Richard Baker; Terence Picton; Karolina Kluk
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2011 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.570

2.  Stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emission suppression tuning in humans: comparison to behavioral tuning.

Authors:  Karolina K Charaziak; Pamela Souza; Jonathan H Siegel
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2013-09-07

3.  Spatial tuning curves from apical, middle, and basal electrodes in cochlear implant users.

Authors:  David A Nelson; Heather A Kreft; Elizabeth S Anderson; Gail S Donaldson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 4.  The Physiologic and Psychophysical Consequences of Severe-to-Profound Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Pamela Souza; Eric Hoover
Journal:  Semin Hear       Date:  2018-10-26

5.  Time-efficient measures of auditory frequency selectivity.

Authors:  Karolina K Charaziak; Pamela Souza; Jonathan H Siegel
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2011-11-22       Impact factor: 2.117

6.  Identifying cochlear implant channels with poor electrode-neuron interface: partial tripolar, single-channel thresholds and psychophysical tuning curves.

Authors:  Julie Arenberg Bierer; Kathleen F Faulkner
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 3.570

Review 7.  Development and current status of the "Cambridge" loudness models.

Authors:  Brian C J Moore
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2014-10-13       Impact factor: 3.293

8.  A Hearing-Model-Based Active-Learning Test for the Determination of Dead Regions.

Authors:  Josef Schlittenlacher; Richard E Turner; Brian C J Moore
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2018 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

9.  Comparing Rapid and Traditional Forward-Masked Spatial Tuning Curves in Cochlear-Implant Users.

Authors:  Heather A Kreft; Lindsay A DeVries; Julie G Arenberg; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2019 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

10.  Comparison of Frequency Transposition and Frequency Compression for People With Extensive Dead Regions in the Cochlea.

Authors:  Marina Salorio-Corbetto; Thomas Baer; Brian C J Moore
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2019 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.