Literature DB >> 21588993

Cinnamoyl-thio-urea.

Ibrahim N Hassan1, Bohari M Yamin, Mohammad B Kassim.   

Abstract

IN THE TITLE COMPOUND [SYSTEMATIC NAME: 1-(3-phenyl-prop-2-eno-yl)thio-urea], C(10)H(10)N(2)OS, the acetyl-thio-urea fragment and the phenyl ring adopt an E configuration. The roughly planar but-2-enoyl-thio-urea fragment [maximum deviation = 0.053 (3) Å] forms a dihedral of 10.54 (11)° with the phenyl ring. An intra-molecular N-H⋯O hydrogen bond generates an S(6) ring. In the crystal, mol-ecules are linked into sheets parallel to (100) by N-H⋯S hydrogen bonds.

Entities:  

Year:  2010        PMID: 21588993      PMCID: PMC3009376          DOI: 10.1107/S1600536810040018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online        ISSN: 1600-5368


Related literature

For the preparation, see: Hassan et al. (2010a ▶). For related structures, see: Hung et al. (2010 ▶); Hassan et al. (2008 ▶, 2009 ▶, 2010 ▶); Yamin & Hassan (2004 ▶). For bond-length data, see: Allen et al. (1987 ▶).

Experimental

Crystal data

C10H10N2OS M = 206.26 Monoclinic, a = 14.3313 (18) Å b = 4.9801 (6) Å c = 15.4199 (19) Å β = 111.612 (3)° V = 1023.2 (2) Å3 Z = 4 Mo Kα radiation μ = 0.28 mm−1 T = 273 K 0.34 × 0.12 × 0.09 mm

Data collection

Bruker SMART APEX CCD area-detector diffractometer Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Sheldrick, 2000 ▶) T min = 0.960, T max = 0.975 7192 measured reflections 2551 independent reflections 1688 reflections with I > 2σ(I) R int = 0.039

Refinement

R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.065 wR(F 2) = 0.156 S = 1.08 2551 reflections 127 parameters 3 restraints H-atom parameters constrained Δρmax = 0.40 e Å−3 Δρmin = −0.20 e Å−3 Data collection: SMART (Bruker, 2000 ▶); cell refinement: SAINT (Bruker, 2000 ▶); data reduction: SAINT; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); molecular graphics: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXTL, PARST (Nardelli, 1995 ▶) and PLATON (Spek, 2009 ▶). Crystal structure: contains datablocks global, I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536810040018/ci5180sup1.cif Structure factors: contains datablocks I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536810040018/ci5180Isup2.hkl Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report
C10H10N2OSF(000) = 432
Mr = 206.26Dx = 1.339 Mg m3
Monoclinic, P21/cMo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Hall symbol: -P 2ybcCell parameters from 1059 reflections
a = 14.3313 (18) Åθ = 1.5–28.3°
b = 4.9801 (6) ŵ = 0.28 mm1
c = 15.4199 (19) ÅT = 273 K
β = 111.612 (3)°Plate, colourless
V = 1023.2 (2) Å30.34 × 0.12 × 0.09 mm
Z = 4
Bruker SMART APEX CCD area-detector diffractometer2551 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube1688 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
graphiteRint = 0.039
ω scansθmax = 28.3°, θmin = 1.5°
Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Sheldrick, 2000)h = −18→19
Tmin = 0.960, Tmax = 0.975k = −6→6
7192 measured reflectionsl = −20→16
Refinement on F2Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: fullSecondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.065Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
wR(F2) = 0.156H-atom parameters constrained
S = 1.08w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0703P)2 + 0.1088P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
2551 reflections(Δ/σ)max = 0.001
127 parametersΔρmax = 0.40 e Å3
3 restraintsΔρmin = −0.20 e Å3
Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.
xyzUiso*/Ueq
S1−0.03467 (5)0.16643 (15)0.35571 (4)0.0559 (3)
O10.24962 (15)0.6309 (4)0.51663 (12)0.0647 (6)
N10.11111 (14)0.5226 (4)0.38961 (13)0.0428 (5)
H1A0.07900.57400.33390.051*
N20.11216 (16)0.2739 (5)0.51525 (14)0.0551 (6)
H2A0.16800.36410.54790.066*
H2B0.08500.15710.54150.066*
C10.2743 (2)1.2916 (6)0.26352 (19)0.0553 (7)
H1B0.21121.21490.23500.066*
C20.3067 (2)1.4824 (6)0.2166 (2)0.0674 (8)
H2C0.26551.53310.15670.081*
C30.3993 (2)1.5982 (6)0.2575 (2)0.0676 (8)
H3A0.42061.72730.22530.081*
C40.4604 (2)1.5251 (6)0.3454 (2)0.0669 (8)
H4A0.52321.60430.37310.080*
C50.42846 (19)1.3317 (6)0.3932 (2)0.0551 (7)
H5A0.47041.28190.45300.066*
C60.33484 (18)1.2118 (5)0.35306 (17)0.0431 (6)
C70.30347 (18)1.0120 (5)0.40557 (17)0.0456 (6)
H7A0.34620.98380.46700.055*
C80.22069 (18)0.8664 (5)0.37521 (16)0.0434 (6)
H8A0.17580.89000.31430.052*
C90.19735 (18)0.6684 (5)0.43484 (16)0.0433 (6)
C100.06860 (17)0.3267 (5)0.42595 (15)0.0395 (5)
U11U22U33U12U13U23
S10.0556 (4)0.0654 (5)0.0402 (4)−0.0166 (3)0.0101 (3)0.0071 (3)
O10.0744 (13)0.0688 (13)0.0390 (10)−0.0198 (10)0.0072 (9)0.0076 (9)
N10.0475 (11)0.0421 (11)0.0342 (10)−0.0031 (9)0.0097 (9)0.0060 (9)
N20.0651 (14)0.0608 (15)0.0354 (11)−0.0148 (11)0.0139 (10)0.0072 (10)
C10.0558 (15)0.0559 (17)0.0509 (15)−0.0097 (13)0.0160 (13)0.0026 (13)
C20.077 (2)0.065 (2)0.0623 (18)−0.0090 (17)0.0280 (16)0.0113 (16)
C30.081 (2)0.0569 (18)0.083 (2)−0.0114 (16)0.0516 (19)0.0027 (17)
C40.0598 (17)0.0601 (19)0.092 (2)−0.0174 (15)0.0407 (18)−0.0169 (18)
C50.0523 (15)0.0526 (16)0.0576 (17)−0.0040 (13)0.0170 (13)−0.0088 (14)
C60.0444 (12)0.0373 (13)0.0470 (14)−0.0009 (10)0.0162 (11)−0.0036 (11)
C70.0488 (14)0.0427 (14)0.0392 (12)−0.0002 (11)0.0090 (11)−0.0021 (11)
C80.0490 (13)0.0410 (14)0.0368 (12)−0.0022 (11)0.0117 (10)−0.0003 (11)
C90.0504 (13)0.0408 (14)0.0369 (13)−0.0005 (11)0.0140 (11)−0.0009 (11)
C100.0455 (12)0.0383 (12)0.0360 (12)0.0041 (11)0.0162 (10)0.0034 (10)
S1—C101.679 (2)C2—H2C0.93
O1—C91.221 (3)C3—C41.365 (4)
N1—C101.374 (3)C3—H3A0.93
N1—C91.381 (3)C4—C51.389 (4)
N1—H1A0.85C4—H4A0.93
N2—C101.312 (3)C5—C61.389 (3)
N2—H2A0.89C5—H5A0.93
N2—H2B0.88C6—C71.455 (3)
C1—C21.374 (4)C7—C81.320 (3)
C1—C61.391 (3)C7—H7A0.93
C1—H1B0.93C8—C91.468 (3)
C2—C31.369 (4)C8—H8A0.93
C10—N1—C9128.04 (19)C6—C5—C4121.0 (3)
C10—N1—H1A118.0C6—C5—H5A119.5
C9—N1—H1A113.7C4—C5—H5A119.5
C10—N2—H2A118.2C5—C6—C1117.8 (2)
C10—N2—H2B119.8C5—C6—C7119.5 (2)
H2A—N2—H2B122.0C1—C6—C7122.7 (2)
C2—C1—C6120.8 (3)C8—C7—C6126.9 (2)
C2—C1—H1B119.6C8—C7—H7A116.6
C6—C1—H1B119.6C6—C7—H7A116.6
C3—C2—C1120.4 (3)C7—C8—C9121.9 (2)
C3—C2—H2C119.8C7—C8—H8A119.0
C1—C2—H2C119.8C9—C8—H8A119.0
C4—C3—C2120.3 (3)O1—C9—N1122.4 (2)
C4—C3—H3A119.9O1—C9—C8123.7 (2)
C2—C3—H3A119.9N1—C9—C8113.9 (2)
C3—C4—C5119.7 (3)N2—C10—N1117.3 (2)
C3—C4—H4A120.1N2—C10—S1123.18 (19)
C5—C4—H4A120.1N1—C10—S1119.49 (17)
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
N2—H2A···O10.891.952.649 (3)134
N1—H1A···S1i0.852.793.602 (2)159
N2—H2B···S1ii0.882.543.409 (2)169
Table 1

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

D—H⋯AD—HH⋯ADAD—H⋯A
N2—H2A⋯O10.891.952.649 (3)134
N1—H1A⋯S1i0.852.793.602 (2)159
N2—H2B⋯S1ii0.882.543.409 (2)169

Symmetry codes: (i) ; (ii) .

  9 in total

1.  A short history of SHELX.

Authors:  George M Sheldrick
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr A       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 2.290

2.  Methyl 2-(3-benzoyl-thio-ureido)acetate.

Authors:  Ibrahim N Hassan; Bohari M Yamin; Mohammad B Kassim
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online       Date:  2009-11-14

3.  Butyl 2-(3-benzoyl-thio-ureido)acetate.

Authors:  Ibrahim N Hassan; Bohari M Yamin; Mohammad B Kassim
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online       Date:  2008-10-22

4.  Propyl 2-(3-benzoyl-thio-ureido)acetate.

Authors:  Ibrahim N Hassan; Bohari M Yamin; Mohammad B Kassim
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online       Date:  2008-10-09

5.  (E)-Methyl 2-(3-cinnamoyl-thio-ureido)acetate.

Authors:  Ibrahim N Hassan; Bohari M Yamin; Mohammad B Kassim
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online       Date:  2010-08-11

6.  (E)-Ethyl 2-(3-cinnamoyl-thio-ureido)acetate.

Authors:  Ibrahim N Hassan; Bohari M Yamin; Mohammad B Kassim
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online       Date:  2010-10-09

7.  1,1'-Diphenyl-3,3'-(p-phenyl-enedicarbon-yl)dithio-urea.

Authors:  Wong W Hung; Ibrahim N Hassan; Bohari M Yamin; Mohammad B Kassim
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online       Date:  2010-01-09

8.  Ethyl 2-(3-benzoyl-thio-ureido)acetate.

Authors:  Ibrahim N Hassan; Bohari M Yamin; Mohammad B Kassim
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online       Date:  2008-08-09

9.  Structure validation in chemical crystallography.

Authors:  Anthony L Spek
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr       Date:  2009-01-20
  9 in total
  2 in total

1.  (E)-2-(3-Cinnamoyl-thio-ureido)acetic acid dimethyl sulfoxide disolvate.

Authors:  Ibrahim N Hassan; Wan Ramli Wan Daud; Bohari M Yamin; Mohammad B Kassim
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online       Date:  2011-09-17

2.  2,4-Di-chloro-N-[eth-yl(2-hy-droxy-eth-yl)carbamo-thio-yl]benzamide.

Authors:  Bohari M Yamin; Suhaila Sapari; Siti Aishah Hasbullah
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online       Date:  2013-12-11
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.