Literature DB >> 21520843

Dosimetry tools and techniques for IMRT.

Daniel A Low1, Jean M Moran, James F Dempsey, Lei Dong, Mark Oldham.   

Abstract

Intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) poses a number of challenges for properly measuring commissioning data and quality assurance (QA) radiation dose distributions. This report provides a comprehensive overview of how dosimeters, phantoms, and dose distribution analysis techniques should be used to support the commissioning and quality assurance requirements of an IMRT program. The proper applications of each dosimeter are described along with the limitations of each system. Point detectors, arrays, film, and electronic portal imagers are discussed with respect to their proper use, along with potential applications of 3D dosimetry. Regardless of the IMRT technique utilized, some situations require the use of multiple detectors for the acquisition of accurate commissioning data. The overall goal of this task group report is to provide a document that aids the physicist in the proper selection and use of the dosimetry tools available for IMRT QA and to provide a resource for physicists that describes dosimetry measurement techniques for purposes of IMRT commissioning and measurement-based characterization or verification of IMRT treatment plans. This report is not intended to provide a comprehensive review of commissioning and QA procedures for IMRT. Instead, this report focuses on the aspects of metrology, particularly the practical aspects of measurements that are unique to IMRT. The metrology of IMRT concerns the application of measurement instruments and their suitability, calibration, and quality control of measurements. Each of the dosimetry measurement tools has limitations that need to be considered when incorporating them into a commissioning process or a comprehensive QA program. For example, routine quality assurance procedures require the use of robust field dosimetry systems. These often exhibit limitations with respect to spatial resolution or energy response and need to themselves be commissioned against more established dosimeters. A chain of dosimeters, from secondary standards to field instruments, is established to assure the quantitative nature of the tests. This report is intended to describe the characteristics of the components of these systems; dosimeters, phantoms, and dose evaluation algorithms. This work is the report of AAPM Task Group 120.

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21520843     DOI: 10.1118/1.3514120

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  87 in total

1.  Radioluminescence characterization of in situ x-ray nanodosimeters: Potential real-time monitors and modulators of external beam radiation therapy.

Authors:  Jeffrey S Souris; Shih-Hsun Cheng; Charles Pelizzari; Nai-Tzu Chen; Patrick La Riviere; Chin-Tu Chen; Leu-Wei Lo
Journal:  Appl Phys Lett       Date:  2014-11-20       Impact factor: 3.791

2.  Independent calculation of monitor units for VMAT and SPORT.

Authors:  Xin Chen; Karl Bush; Aiping Ding; Lei Xing
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 3.  Complexity metrics for IMRT and VMAT plans: a review of current literature and applications.

Authors:  Sophie Chiavassa; Igor Bessieres; Magali Edouard; Michel Mathot; Alexandra Moignier
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2019-07-24       Impact factor: 3.039

4.  A quality assurance method that utilizes 3D dosimetry and facilitates clinical interpretation.

Authors:  Mark Oldham; Andrew Thomas; Jennifer O'Daniel; Titania Juang; Geoffrey Ibbott; John Adamovics; John P Kirkpatrick
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2012-02-22       Impact factor: 7.038

5.  Penalization of aperture complexity in inversely planned volumetric modulated arc therapy.

Authors:  Kelly C Younge; Martha M Matuszak; Jean M Moran; Daniel L McShan; Benedick A Fraass; Donald A Roberts
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  Novel, full 3D scintillation dosimetry using a static plenoptic camera.

Authors:  Mathieu Goulet; Madison Rilling; Luc Gingras; Sam Beddar; Luc Beaulieu; Louis Archambault
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 4.071

7.  Validation of a quick three-dimensional dose verification system for pre-treatment IMRT QA.

Authors:  Yuji Nakaguchi; Fujio Araki; Takeshi Ono; Yuki Tomiyama; Masato Maruyama; Nozomu Nagasue; Yoshinobu Shimohigashi; Yudai Kai
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2014-09-27

8.  The report of Task Group 100 of the AAPM: Application of risk analysis methods to radiation therapy quality management.

Authors:  M Saiful Huq; Benedick A Fraass; Peter B Dunscombe; John P Gibbons; Geoffrey S Ibbott; Arno J Mundt; Sasa Mutic; Jatinder R Palta; Frank Rath; Bruce R Thomadsen; Jeffrey F Williamson; Ellen D Yorke
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 4.071

9.  Dosimetric verification for intensity-modulated arc therapy plans by use of 2D diode array, radiochromic film and radiosensitive polymer gel.

Authors:  Naoki Hayashi; Ryan L Malmin; Yoichi Watanabe
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  2014-01-20       Impact factor: 2.724

10.  Two-dimensional high spatial-resolution dosimeter using europium doped potassium chloride: a feasibility study.

Authors:  H Harold Li; Joseph P Driewer; Zhaohui Han; Daniel A Low; Deshan Yang; Zhiyan Xiao
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2014-03-20       Impact factor: 3.609

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.