Literature DB >> 24449714

Dosimetric verification for intensity-modulated arc therapy plans by use of 2D diode array, radiochromic film and radiosensitive polymer gel.

Naoki Hayashi1, Ryan L Malmin, Yoichi Watanabe.   

Abstract

Several tools are used for the dosimetric verification of intensity-modulated arc therapy (IMAT) treatment delivery. However, limited information is available for composite on-line evaluation of these tools. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the dosimetric verification of IMAT treatment plans using a 2D diode array detector (2D array), radiochromic film (RCF) and radiosensitive polymer gel dosimeter (RPGD). The specific verification plans were created for IMAT for two prostate cancer patients by use of the clinical treatment plans. Accordingly, the IMAT deliveries were performed with the 2D array on a gantry-mounting device, RCF in a cylindrical acrylic phantom, and the RPGD in two cylindrical phantoms. After the irradiation, the planar dose distributions from the 2D array and the RCFs, and the 3D dose distributions from the RPGD measurements were compared with the calculated dose distributions using the gamma analysis method (3% dose difference and 3-mm distance-to-agreement criterion), dose-dependent dose difference diagrams, dose difference histograms, and isodose distributions. The gamma passing rates of 2D array, RCFs and RPGD for one patient were 99.5%, 96.5% and 93.7%, respectively; the corresponding values for the second patient were 97.5%, 92.6% and 92.9%. Mean percentage differences between the RPGD measured and calculated doses in 3D volumes containing PTVs were -0.29 ± 7.1% and 0.97 ± 7.6% for the two patients, respectively. In conclusion, IMAT prostate plans can be delivered with high accuracy, although the 3D measurements indicated less satisfactory agreement with the treatment plans, mainly due to the dosimetric inaccuracy in low-dose regions of the RPGD measurements.

Entities:  

Keywords:  2D array detector; 3D dose measurement; IMAT; dosimetric verification; radiochromic films; radiosensitive polymer gel

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24449714      PMCID: PMC4014162          DOI: 10.1093/jrr/rrt139

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Radiat Res        ISSN: 0449-3060            Impact factor:   2.724


  17 in total

1.  Evaluation of the basic properties of the BANGkit gel dosimeter.

Authors:  Y Murakami; T Nakashima; Y Watanabe; T Akimitsu; K Matsuura; M Kenjo; Y Kaneyasu; K Wadasaki; Y Hirokawa; K Ito
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2007-04-02       Impact factor: 3.609

2.  Effects of phantom volume and shape on the accuracy of MRI BANG gel dosimetry using BANG3.

Authors:  N D MacDougall; M E Miquel; S F Keevil
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2007-11-12       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 3.  A literature review of electronic portal imaging for radiotherapy dosimetry.

Authors:  Wouter van Elmpt; Leah McDermott; Sebastiaan Nijsten; Markus Wendling; Philippe Lambin; Ben Mijnheer
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2008-08-14       Impact factor: 6.280

4.  Quality assurance of intensity-modulated radiation therapy.

Authors:  Jatinder R Palta; Chihray Liu; Jonathan G Li
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 7.038

Review 5.  Dosimetry tools and techniques for IMRT.

Authors:  Daniel A Low; Jean M Moran; James F Dempsey; Lei Dong; Mark Oldham
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  A variable echo-number method for estimating R2 in MRI-based polymer gel dosimetry.

Authors:  Yoichi Watanabe; Hitoshi Kubo
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 7.  American College of Radiology (ACR) and American Society for Radiation Oncology (ASTRO) Practice Guideline for Intensity-modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT).

Authors:  Alan C Hartford; James M Galvin; David C Beyer; Thomas J Eichler; Geoffrey S Ibbott; Brian Kavanagh; Christopher J Schultz; Seth A Rosenthal
Journal:  Am J Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 2.339

8.  Intensity-modulated arc therapy with dynamic multileaf collimation: an alternative to tomotherapy.

Authors:  C X Yu
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 3.609

9.  Evaluation of triple channel correction acquisition method for radiochromic film dosimetry.

Authors:  Naoki Hayashi; Yoichi Watanabe; Ryan Malmin; Hideki Kato
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  2012-08-21       Impact factor: 2.724

10.  Errors introduced by dose scaling for relative dosimetry.

Authors:  Yoichi Watanabe; Naoki Hayashi
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2012-09-06       Impact factor: 2.102

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Three-dimensional radiation dosimetry using polymer gel and solid radiochromic polymer: From basics to clinical applications.

Authors:  Yoichi Watanabe; Leighton Warmington; N Gopishankar
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2017-03-28

2.  Three-dimensional dose comparison of flattening filter (FF) and flattening filter-free (FFF) radiation therapy by using NIPAM gel dosimetry.

Authors:  Chun-Hsu Yao; Tung-Hao Chang; Chia-Chi Lin; Yuan-Chun Lai; Chin-Hsing Chen; Yuan-Jen Chang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-02-21       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Validation of a secondary dose check tool against Monte Carlo and analytical clinical dose calculation algorithms in VMAT.

Authors:  Stefano Piffer; Marta Casati; Livia Marrazzo; Chiara Arilli; Silvia Calusi; Isacco Desideri; Franco Fusi; Stefania Pallotta; Cinzia Talamonti
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2021-03-18       Impact factor: 2.102

4.  Patient-Specific Quality Assurance Protocol for Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy using Dose Volume Histogram.

Authors:  Christopher Low; Warren Toye; Peter Phung; Christopher Huston
Journal:  J Med Phys       Date:  2018 Apr-Jun
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.