Literature DB >> 25086549

Novel, full 3D scintillation dosimetry using a static plenoptic camera.

Mathieu Goulet1, Madison Rilling2, Luc Gingras1, Sam Beddar3, Luc Beaulieu1, Louis Archambault1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Patient-specific quality assurance (QA) of dynamic radiotherapy delivery would gain from being performed using a 3D dosimeter. However, 3D dosimeters, such as gels, have many disadvantages limiting to quality assurance, such as tedious read-out procedures and poor reproducibility. The purpose of this work is to develop and validate a novel type of high resolution 3D dosimeter based on the real-time light acquisition of a plastic scintillator volume using a plenoptic camera. This dosimeter would allow for the QA of dynamic radiation therapy techniques such as intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) or volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT).
METHODS: A Raytrix R5 plenoptic camera was used to image a 10 × 10 × 10 cm(3) EJ-260 plastic scintillator embedded inside an acrylic phantom at a rate of one acquisition per second. The scintillator volume was irradiated with both an IMRT and VMAT treatment plan on a Clinac iX linear accelerator. The 3D light distribution emitted by the scintillator volume was reconstructed at a 2 mm resolution in all dimensions by back-projecting the light collected by each pixel of the light-field camera using an iterative reconstruction algorithm. The latter was constrained by a beam's eye view projection of the incident dose acquired using the portal imager integrated with the linac and by physical consideration of the dose behavior as a function of depth in the phantom.
RESULTS: The absolute dose difference between the reconstructed 3D dose and the expected dose calculated using the treatment planning software Pinnacle(3) was on average below 1.5% of the maximum dose for both integrated IMRT and VMAT deliveries, and below 3% for each individual IMRT incidences. Dose agreement between the reconstructed 3D dose and a radiochromic film acquisition in the same experimental phantom was on average within 2.1% and 1.2% of the maximum recorded dose for the IMRT and VMAT delivery, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Using plenoptic camera technology, the authors were able to perform millimeter resolution, water-equivalent dosimetry of an IMRT and VMAT plan over a whole 3D volume. Since no moving parts are required in the dosimeter, the incident dose distribution can be acquired as a function of time, thus enabling the validation of static and dynamic radiation delivery with photons, electrons, and heavier ions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25086549      PMCID: PMC5148070          DOI: 10.1118/1.4884036

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  25 in total

1.  A fourier analysis of the dose grid resolution required for accurate IMRT fluence map optimization.

Authors:  James F Dempsey; H Edwin Romeijn; Jonathan G Li; Daniel A Low; Jatinder R Palta
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Volumetric modulated arc therapy: IMRT in a single gantry arc.

Authors:  Karl Otto
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Preliminary investigations on the determination of three-dimensional dose distributions using scintillator blocks and optical tomography.

Authors:  Florian Kroll; Jörg Pawelke; Leonhard Karsch
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  High resolution 2D dose measurement device based on a few long scintillating fibers and tomographic reconstruction.

Authors:  Mathieu Goulet; Louis Archambault; Luc Beaulieu; Luc Gingras
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Exploration of the potential of liquid scintillators for real-time 3D dosimetry of intensity modulated proton beams.

Authors:  Sam Beddar; Louis Archambault; Narayan Sahoo; Falk Poenisch; George T Chen; Michael T Gillin; Radhe Mohan
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  Real-time verification of multileaf collimator-driven radiotherapy using a novel optical attenuation-based fluence monitor.

Authors:  Mathieu Goulet; Luc Gingras; Luc Beaulieu
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 4.071

7.  Projection imaging of photon beams by the Čerenkov effect.

Authors:  Adam K Glaser; Scott C Davis; David M McClatchy; Rongxiao Zhang; Brian W Pogue; David J Gladstone
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 4.071

8.  Tomotherapy: a new concept for the delivery of dynamic conformal radiotherapy.

Authors:  T R Mackie; T Holmes; S Swerdloff; P Reckwerdt; J O Deasy; J Yang; B Paliwal; T Kinsella
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1993 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 9.  Polymer gel dosimetry.

Authors:  C Baldock; Y De Deene; S Doran; G Ibbott; A Jirasek; M Lepage; K B McAuley; M Oldham; L J Schreiner
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2010-02-11       Impact factor: 3.609

10.  Optical CT reconstruction of 3D dose distributions using the ferrous-benzoic-xylenol (FBX) gel dosimeter.

Authors:  R G Kelly; K J Jordan; J J Battista
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 4.071

View more
  7 in total

1.  Optical imaging provides rapid verification of static small beams, radiosurgery, and VMAT plans with millimeter resolution.

Authors:  Muhammad Ramish Ashraf; Petr Bruza; Brian W Pogue; Nathan Nelson; Benjamin B Williams; Lesley A Jarvis; David J Gladstone
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2019-10-04       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Online Combination of EPID & Cherenkov Imaging for 3-D Dosimetry in a Liquid Phantom.

Authors:  Petr Bruza; Jacqueline M Andreozzi; David J Gladstone; Lesley A Jarvis; Joerg Rottmann; Brian W Pogue
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2017-06-20       Impact factor: 10.048

3.  Direct in-water radiation dose measurements using Cherenkov emission corrected signals from polarization imaging for a clinical radiotherapy application.

Authors:  Émily Cloutier; Luc Beaulieu; Louis Archambault
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-06-10       Impact factor: 4.996

Review 4.  Ultra-high dose rate electron beams and the FLASH effect: From preclinical evidence to a new radiotherapy paradigm.

Authors:  Emil Schüler; Munjal Acharya; Pierre Montay-Gruel; Billy W Loo; Marie-Catherine Vozenin; Peter G Maxim
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2022-01-19       Impact factor: 4.506

5.  Intensity-modulated radiation therapy dose verification using fluence and portal imaging device.

Authors:  Iori Sumida; Hajime Yamaguchi; Indra J Das; Hisao Kizaki; Keiko Aboshi; Mari Tsujii; Yuji Yamada; Osamu Suzuki; Yuji Seo; Fumiaki Isohashi; Kazuhiko Ogawa
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2016-01-08       Impact factor: 2.102

6.  I-BEAT: Ultrasonic method for online measurement of the energy distribution of a single ion bunch.

Authors:  Daniel Haffa; Rong Yang; Jianhui Bin; Sebastian Lehrack; Florian-Emanuel Brack; Hao Ding; Franz S Englbrecht; Ying Gao; Johannes Gebhard; Max Gilljohann; Johannes Götzfried; Jens Hartmann; Sebastian Herr; Peter Hilz; Stephan D Kraft; Christian Kreuzer; Florian Kroll; Florian H Lindner; Josefine Metzkes-Ng; Tobias M Ostermayr; Enrico Ridente; Thomas F Rösch; Gregor Schilling; Hans-Peter Schlenvoigt; Martin Speicher; Derya Taray; Matthias Würl; Karl Zeil; Ulrich Schramm; Stefan Karsch; Katia Parodi; Paul R Bolton; Walter Assmann; Jörg Schreiber
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-04-30       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Evaluation of tracking accuracy of the CyberKnife system using a webcam and printed calibrated grid.

Authors:  Iori Sumida; Hiroya Shiomi; Naokazu Higashinaka; Yoshikazu Murashima; Youichi Miyamoto; Hideya Yamazaki; Nobuhisa Mabuchi; Eimei Tsuda; Kazuhiko Ogawa
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2016-03-08       Impact factor: 2.102

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.