Literature DB >> 23145701

Pitch strength of noise-vocoded harmonic tone complexes in normal-hearing listeners.

William P Shofner1, Jeannine Campbell.   

Abstract

To study the role of harmonic structure in pitch perception, normal-hearing listeners were tested using noise-vocoded harmonic tone complexes. When tested in a magnitude judgment procedure using vocoded versions generated with 2-128 channels, judgments of pitch strength increased systematically as the number of channels increased and reflected acoustic cues based on harmonic peak-to-valley ratio, but not cues based on periodicity strength. When tested in a fundamental frequency discrimination task, listeners correctly recognized the direction of pitch change with as few as eight noise-vocoded channels. The results suggest that spectral processing contributes substantially to pitch perception in normal-hearing listeners.

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23145701      PMCID: PMC3482252          DOI: 10.1121/1.4757697

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  14 in total

1.  Pitch strength and Stevens's power law.

Authors:  William P Shofner; George Selas
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2002-04

2.  Correct tonotopic representation is necessary for complex pitch perception.

Authors:  Andrew J Oxenham; Joshua G W Bernstein; Hector Penagos
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-01-12       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  The Ohm-Seebeck dispute, Hermann von Helmholtz, and the origins of physiological acoustics.

Authors:  R S Turner
Journal:  Br J Hist Sci       Date:  1977-03

Review 4.  The number of spectral channels required for speech recognition depends on the difficulty of the listening situation.

Authors:  Robert V Shannon; Qian-Jie Fu; John Galvin
Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol Suppl       Date:  2004-05

5.  Can temporal fine structure represent the fundamental frequency of unresolved harmonics?

Authors:  Andrew J Oxenham; Christophe Micheyl; Michael V Keebler
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 6.  Pitch perception.

Authors:  William A Yost
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 2.199

7.  Pitch of iterated rippled noise.

Authors:  W A Yost
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Pitch strength of iterated rippled noise.

Authors:  W A Yost
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Representation of voice pitch in discharge patterns of auditory-nerve fibers.

Authors:  M I Miller; M B Sachs
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1984-06       Impact factor: 3.208

10.  Frequency discrimination of complex tones; assessing the role of component resolvability and temporal fine structure.

Authors:  Brian C J Moore; Brian R Glasberg; Helen J Flanagan; Joe Adams
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  4 in total

1.  Vocoder Simulations Explain Complex Pitch Perception Limitations Experienced by Cochlear Implant Users.

Authors:  Anahita H Mehta; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2017-07-21

2.  Cochlear tuning and the peripheral representation of harmonic sounds in mammals.

Authors:  William P Shofner
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2022-07-22       Impact factor: 2.389

3.  The role of harmonic resolvability in pitch perception in a vocal nonhuman primate, the common marmoset (Callithrix jacchus).

Authors:  Michael S Osmanski; Xindong Song; Xiaoqin Wang
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-05-22       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Across-species differences in pitch perception are consistent with differences in cochlear filtering.

Authors:  Josh H McDermott; Andrew J King; Kerry Mm Walker; Ray Gonzalez; Joe Z Kang
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2019-03-15       Impact factor: 8.140

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.