Literature DB >> 11570999

Evaluating auditory performance limits: i. one-parameter discrimination using a computational model for the auditory nerve.

M G Heinz1, H S Colburn, L H Carney.   

Abstract

A method for calculating psychophysical performance limits based on stochastic neural responses is introduced and compared to previous analytical methods for evaluating auditory discrimination of tone frequency and level. The method uses signal detection theory and a computational model for a population of auditory nerve (AN) fiber responses. The use of computational models allows predictions to be made over a wider parameter range and with more complete descriptions of AN responses than in analytical models. Performance based on AN discharge times (all-information) is compared to performance based only on discharge counts (rate-place). After the method is verified over the range of parameters for which previous analytical models are applicable, the parameter space is then extended. For example, a computational model of AN activity that extends to high frequencies is used to explore the common belief that rate-place information is responsible for frequency encoding at high frequencies due to the rolloff in AN phase locking above 2 kHz. This rolloff is thought to eliminate temporal information at high frequencies. Contrary to this belief, results of this analysis show that rate-place predictions for frequency discrimination are inconsistent with human performance in the dependence on frequency for high frequencies and that there is significant temporal information in the AN up to at least 10 kHz. In fact, the all-information predictions match the functional dependence of human performance on frequency, although optimal performance is much better than human performance. The use of computational AN models in this study provides new constraints on hypotheses of neural encoding of frequency in the auditory system; however, the method is limited to simple tasks with deterministic stimuli. A companion article in this issue ("Evaluating Auditory Performance Limits: II") describes an extension of this approach to more complex tasks that include random variation of one parameter, for example, random-level variation, which is often used in psychophysics to test neural encoding hypotheses.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11570999     DOI: 10.1162/089976601750541804

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neural Comput        ISSN: 0899-7667            Impact factor:   2.026


  61 in total

1.  Revisiting place and temporal theories of pitch.

Authors:  Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  Acoust Sci Technol       Date:  2013

Review 2.  Quantifying the information in auditory-nerve responses for level discrimination.

Authors:  H Steven Colburn; Laurel H Carney; Michael G Heinz
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2003-09

3.  A point process framework for modeling electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve.

Authors:  Joshua H Goldwyn; Jay T Rubinstein; Eric Shea-Brown
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-06-06       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Implications of within-fiber temporal coding for perceptual studies of F0 discrimination and discrimination of harmonic and inharmonic tone complexes.

Authors:  Sushrut Kale; Christophe Micheyl; Michael G Heinz
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2014-06

5.  Encoding and decoding amplitude-modulated cochlear implant stimuli--a point process analysis.

Authors:  Joshua H Goldwyn; Eric Shea-Brown; Jay T Rubinstein
Journal:  J Comput Neurosci       Date:  2010-02-23       Impact factor: 1.621

6.  Wiener kernels of chinchilla auditory-nerve fibers: verification using responses to tones, clicks, and noise and comparison with basilar-membrane vibrations.

Authors:  Andrei N Temchin; Alberto Recio-Spinoso; Pim van Dijk; Mario A Ruggero
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2005-01-19       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Encoding of vowel-like sounds in the auditory nerve: model predictions of discrimination performance.

Authors:  Qing Tan; Laurel H Carney
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Predictions of formant-frequency discrimination in noise based on model auditory-nerve responses.

Authors:  Qing Tan; Laurel H Carney
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Neural rate and timing cues for detection and discrimination of amplitude-modulated tones in the awake rabbit inferior colliculus.

Authors:  Paul C Nelson; Laurel H Carney
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2006-11-01       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Characterizing the dependence of pure-tone frequency difference limens on frequency, duration, and level.

Authors:  Christophe Micheyl; Li Xiao; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2012-07-25       Impact factor: 3.208

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.