Literature DB >> 28429126

Assessing the Role of Place and Timing Cues in Coding Frequency and Amplitude Modulation as a Function of Age.

Kelly L Whiteford1, Heather A Kreft2, Andrew J Oxenham2.   

Abstract

Natural sounds can be characterized by their fluctuations in amplitude and frequency. Ageing may affect sensitivity to some forms of fluctuations more than others. The present study used individual differences across a wide age range (20-79 years) to test the hypothesis that slow-rate, low-carrier frequency modulation (FM) is coded by phase-locked auditory-nerve responses to temporal fine structure (TFS), whereas fast-rate FM is coded via rate-place (tonotopic) cues, based on amplitude modulation (AM) of the temporal envelope after cochlear filtering. Using a low (500 Hz) carrier frequency, diotic FM and AM detection thresholds were measured at slow (1 Hz) and fast (20 Hz) rates in 85 listeners. Frequency selectivity and TFS coding were assessed using forward masking patterns and interaural phase disparity tasks (slow dichotic FM), respectively. Comparable interaural level disparity tasks (slow and fast dichotic AM and fast dichotic FM) were measured to control for effects of binaural processing not specifically related to TFS coding. Thresholds in FM and AM tasks were correlated, even across tasks thought to use separate peripheral codes. Age was correlated with slow and fast FM thresholds in both diotic and dichotic conditions. The relationship between age and AM thresholds was generally not significant. Once accounting for AM sensitivity, only diotic slow-rate FM thresholds remained significantly correlated with age. Overall, results indicate stronger effects of age on FM than AM. However, because of similar effects for both slow and fast FM when not accounting for AM sensitivity, the effects cannot be unambiguously ascribed to TFS coding.

Keywords:  age; amplitude modulation; frequency modulation; temporal fine structure

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28429126      PMCID: PMC5532184          DOI: 10.1007/s10162-017-0624-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol        ISSN: 1438-7573


  43 in total

1.  Detection of combined frequency and amplitude modulation.

Authors:  B C Moore; A Sek
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Age-related cochlear synaptopathy: an early-onset contributor to auditory functional decline.

Authors:  Yevgeniya Sergeyenko; Kumud Lall; M Charles Liberman; Sharon G Kujawa
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-08-21       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Detection thresholds for sinusoidal frequency modulation.

Authors:  L Demany; C Semal
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Interactions between amplitude modulation and frequency modulation processing: Effects of age and hearing loss.

Authors:  Nihaad Paraouty; Stephan D Ewert; Nicolas Wallaert; Christian Lorenzi
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  A common neural code for frequency- and amplitude-modulated sounds.

Authors:  K Saberi; E R Hafter
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1995-04-06       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Temporal modulation transfer functions based upon modulation thresholds.

Authors:  N F Viemeister
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1979-11       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Frequency modulation detection as a measure of temporal processing: age-related monaural and binaural effects.

Authors:  John H Grose; Sara K Mamo
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2012-10-03       Impact factor: 3.208

8.  Relations between frequency selectivity, temporal fine-structure processing, and speech reception in impaired hearing.

Authors:  Olaf Strelcyk; Torsten Dau
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Predicting the Perceptual Consequences of Hidden Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2016 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

10.  Auditory frequency and intensity discrimination explained using a cortical population rate code.

Authors:  Christophe Micheyl; Paul R Schrater; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2013-11-14       Impact factor: 4.475

View more
  16 in total

1.  Relating Suprathreshold Auditory Processing Abilities to Speech Understanding in Competition.

Authors:  Frederick J Gallun; Laura Coco; Tess K Koerner; E Sebastian Lelo de Larrea-Mancera; Michelle R Molis; David A Eddins; Aaron R Seitz
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2022-05-27

2.  Effects of Age and Hearing Loss on the Discrimination of Amplitude and Frequency Modulation for 2- and 10-Hz Rates.

Authors:  Brian C J Moore; Sashi Mariathasan; Aleksander P Sęk
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2019 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

Review 3.  The Association Between the Processing of Binaural Temporal-Fine-Structure Information and Audiometric Threshold and Age: A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Christian Füllgrabe; Brian C J Moore
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2018 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

4.  Sensitivity to Interaural Phase in Older Hearing-Impaired Listeners Correlates With Nonauditory Trail Making Scores and With a Spatial Auditory Task of Unrelated Peripheral Origin.

Authors:  Olaf Strelcyk; Pavel Zahorik; James Shehorn; Chhayakanta Patro; Ralph Peter Derleth
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2019 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

5.  A Comparison of Behavioral Methods for Indexing the Auditory Processing of Temporal Fine Structure Cues.

Authors:  Eric C Hoover; Brianna N Kinney; Karen L Bell; Frederick J Gallun; David A Eddins
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2019-05-30       Impact factor: 2.297

6.  Portable Automated Rapid Testing (PART) for auditory assessment: Validation in a young adult normal-hearing population.

Authors:  E Sebastian Lelo de Larrea-Mancera; Trevor Stavropoulos; Eric C Hoover; David A Eddins; Frederick J Gallun; Aaron R Seitz
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2020-10       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Senescent Changes in Sensitivity to Binaural Temporal Fine Structure.

Authors:  Christian Füllgrabe; Aleksander P Sęk; Brian C J Moore
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2018 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

8.  Bottom-up and top-down neural signatures of disordered multi-talker speech perception in adults with normal hearing.

Authors:  Aravindakshan Parthasarathy; Kenneth E Hancock; Kara Bennett; Victor DeGruttola; Daniel B Polley
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2020-01-21       Impact factor: 8.140

9.  Age-Related Deficits in Electrophysiological and Behavioral Measures of Binaural Temporal Processing.

Authors:  Tess K Koerner; Ramesh Kumar Muralimanohar; Frederick J Gallun; Curtis J Billings
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2020-10-27       Impact factor: 4.677

10.  The role of cochlear place coding in the perception of frequency modulation.

Authors:  Kelly L Whiteford; Heather A Kreft; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2020-09-30       Impact factor: 8.140

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.