Literature DB >> 20493704

Individual differences reveal the basis of consonance.

Josh H McDermott1, Andriana J Lehr, Andrew J Oxenham.   

Abstract

Some combinations of musical notes are consonant (pleasant), whereas others are dissonant (unpleasant), a distinction central to music. Explanations of consonance in terms of acoustics, auditory neuroscience, and enculturation have been debated for centuries. We utilized individual differences to distinguish the candidate theories. We measured preferences for musical chords as well as nonmusical sounds that isolated particular acoustic factors--specifically, the beating and the harmonic relationships between frequency components, two factors that have long been thought to potentially underlie consonance. Listeners preferred stimuli without beats and with harmonic spectra, but across more than 250 subjects, only the preference for harmonic spectra was consistently correlated with preferences for consonant over dissonant chords. Harmonicity preferences were also correlated with the number of years subjects had spent playing a musical instrument, suggesting that exposure to music amplifies preferences for harmonic frequencies because of their musical importance. Harmonic spectra are prominent features of natural sounds, and our results indicate that they also underlie the perception of consonance. 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20493704      PMCID: PMC2885564          DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2010.04.019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Biol        ISSN: 0960-9822            Impact factor:   10.834


  24 in total

Review 1.  Neurobiological foundations for the theory of harmony in western tonal music.

Authors:  M J Tramo; P A Cariani; B Delgutte; L D Braida
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 5.691

2.  Auditory grouping.

Authors:  C J Darwin
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 20.229

3.  Perception of musical tension in short chord sequences: the influence of harmonic function, sensory dissonance, horizontal motion, and musical training.

Authors:  E Bigand; R Parncutt; F Lerdahl
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1996-01

4.  Dichotic beats of mistuned consonances.

Authors:  M P Feeney
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Pitch, consonance, and harmony.

Authors:  E Terhardt
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1974-05       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Binaural beats and binaural amplitude-modulated tones: successive comparison of loudness fluctuations.

Authors:  J Rutschmann; L Rubinstein
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1965-11       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Tonal consonance and critical bandwidth.

Authors:  R Plomp; W J Levelt
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1965-10       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Consonance and dissonance of musical chords: neural correlates in auditory cortex of monkeys and humans.

Authors:  Y I Fishman; I O Volkov; M D Noh; P C Garell; H Bakken; J C Arezzo; M A Howard; M Steinschneider
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Frequencies dominant in the perception of the pitch of complex sounds.

Authors:  R J Ritsma
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1967-07       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Neural correlates of consonance, dissonance, and the hierarchy of musical pitch in the human brainstem.

Authors:  Gavin M Bidelman; Ananthanarayan Krishnan
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-10-21       Impact factor: 6.167

View more
  63 in total

1.  Expectations for melodic contours transcend pitch.

Authors:  Jackson E Graves; Christophe Micheyl; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2014-11-03       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  Musical intervals and relative pitch: frequency resolution, not interval resolution, is special.

Authors:  Josh H McDermott; Michael V Keebler; Christophe Micheyl; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Evolution of tonal organization in music mirrors symbolic representation of perceptual reality. Part-1: Prehistoric.

Authors:  Aleksey Nikolsky
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-10-16

4.  Using individual differences to test the role of temporal and place cues in coding frequency modulation.

Authors:  Kelly L Whiteford; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  The use of augmented auditory feedback to improve arm reaching in stroke: a case series.

Authors:  Joyce L Chen; Shinya Fujii; Gottfried Schlaug
Journal:  Disabil Rehabil       Date:  2015-08-28       Impact factor: 3.033

6.  Cortical pitch regions in humans respond primarily to resolved harmonics and are located in specific tonotopic regions of anterior auditory cortex.

Authors:  Sam Norman-Haignere; Nancy Kanwisher; Josh H McDermott
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-12-11       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 7.  Five fundamental constraints on theories of the origins of music.

Authors:  Bjorn Merker; Iain Morley; Willem Zuidema
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2015-03-19       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 8.  Defining the biological bases of individual differences in musicality.

Authors:  Bruno Gingras; Henkjan Honing; Isabelle Peretz; Laurel J Trainor; Simon E Fisher
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2015-03-19       Impact factor: 6.237

9.  A biological rationale for musical consonance.

Authors:  Daniel L Bowling; Dale Purves
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-07-24       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Losing the music: aging affects the perception and subcortical neural representation of musical harmony.

Authors:  Oliver Bones; Christopher J Plack
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2015-03-04       Impact factor: 6.167

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.