Literature DB >> 12090383

Genetic testing: psychological aspects and implications.

Caryn Lerman1, Robert T Croyle, Kenneth P Tercyak, Heidi Hamann.   

Abstract

As the number of genes associated with inherited disease continues to grow, researchers and practitioners in behavioral medicine will encounter complex psychological issues faced by individuals at risk for these diseases. A review of the literature concerning prenatal, carrier, and predictive genetic testing suggests that the severity of psychological risks posed by research-based genetic testing is not great. However, subgroups of individuals with particular psychological traits may be more vulnerable to adverse effects. Available data do not provide evidence that genetic testing promotes changes in health-related behaviors. Thus, although there may be less of a role for mental health professionals in the psychological counseling of genetic testing participants, there is a need for research and practice to facilitate health protective behaviors in response to genetic risk information.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12090383     DOI: 10.1037//0022-006x.70.3.784

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Consult Clin Psychol        ISSN: 0022-006X


  86 in total

Review 1.  Illness representations, self-regulation, and genetic counseling: a theoretical review.

Authors:  Shoshana Shiloh
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 2.537

2.  The perceived advantages and disadvantages of presymptomatic testing for Machado-Joseph disease: development of a new self-response inventory.

Authors:  Luísa Rolim; José A Zagalo-Cardoso; Constança Paúl; Jorge Sequeiros; Manuela Fleming
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2006-09-27       Impact factor: 2.537

Review 3.  Why tell asymptomatic children of the risk of an adult-onset disease in the family but not test them for it?

Authors:  P J Malpas
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 2.903

4.  Receptiveness to participation in genetic research: A pilot study comparing views of people with depression, diabetes, or no illness.

Authors:  Laura Weiss Roberts; Jane Paik Kim
Journal:  J Psychiatr Res       Date:  2017-07-04       Impact factor: 4.791

5.  Closing the loop: action research in a multimodal hereditary cancer patient conference is an effective tool to assess and address patient needs.

Authors:  Carin R Espenschied; Deborah J MacDonald; Julie O Culver; Sharon Sand; Karen Hurley; Kimberly C Banks; Jeffrey N Weitzel; Kathleen R Blazer
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 2.037

6.  Consumer preferences for the predictive genetic test for Alzheimer disease.

Authors:  Ming-Yi Huang; Sally A Huston; Matthew Perri
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2013-07-12       Impact factor: 2.537

7.  Introducing genetic testing for cardiovascular disease in primary care: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Jo B Middlemass; Momina F Yazdani; Joe Kai; Penelope J Standen; Nadeem Qureshi
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 5.386

8.  Is information on genetic determinants of obesity helpful or harmful for obese people?--A randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Winfried Rief; Matthias Conradt; Jan-Michael Dierk; Elisabeth Rauh; Pia Schlumberger; Anke Hinney; Johannes Hebebrand
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2007-09-19       Impact factor: 5.128

9.  Women's satisfaction with genetic counseling for hereditary breast-ovarian cancer: psychological aspects.

Authors:  Kenneth P Tercyak; Tiffani A Demarco; Bryn D Mars; Beth N Peshkin
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2004-11-15       Impact factor: 2.802

10.  Genetics and genetic counseling: recommendations for Alzheimer's disease, frontotemporal dementia, and Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease.

Authors:  Jennifer Williamson; Susan LaRusse
Journal:  Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 5.081

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.