BACKGROUND: Understanding the risk for type 2 diabetes (T2D) early in the life course is important for prevention. Whether genetic information improves prediction models for diabetes from adolescence into adulthood is unknown. METHODS: With the use of data from 1030 participants in the Bogalusa Heart Study aged 12 to 18 followed into middle adulthood, we built Cox models for incident T2D with risk factors assessed in adolescence (demographics, family history, physical examination, and routine biomarkers). Models with and without a 38 single-nucleotide polymorphism diabetes genotype score were compared by C statistics and continuous net reclassification improvement indices. RESULTS: Participant mean (± SD) age at baseline was 14.4 ± 1.6 years, and 32% were black. Ninety (8.7%) participants developed T2D over a mean 26.9 ± 5.0 years of follow-up. Genotype score significantly predicted T2D in all models. Hazard ratios ranged from 1.09 per risk allele (95% confidence interval 1.03-1.15) in the basic demographic model to 1.06 (95% confidence interval 1.00-1.13) in the full model. The addition of genotype score did not improve the discrimination of the full clinical model (C statistic 0.756 without and 0.760 with genotype score). In the full model, genotype score had weak improvement in reclassification (net reclassification improvement index 0.261). CONCLUSIONS: Although a genotype score assessed among white and black adolescents is significantly associated with T2D in adulthood, it does not improve prediction over clinical risk factors. Genetic screening for T2D in its current state is not a useful addition to adolescents' clinical care.
BACKGROUND: Understanding the risk for type 2 diabetes (T2D) early in the life course is important for prevention. Whether genetic information improves prediction models for diabetes from adolescence into adulthood is unknown. METHODS: With the use of data from 1030 participants in the Bogalusa Heart Study aged 12 to 18 followed into middle adulthood, we built Cox models for incident T2D with risk factors assessed in adolescence (demographics, family history, physical examination, and routine biomarkers). Models with and without a 38 single-nucleotide polymorphism diabetes genotype score were compared by C statistics and continuous net reclassification improvement indices. RESULTS:Participant mean (± SD) age at baseline was 14.4 ± 1.6 years, and 32% were black. Ninety (8.7%) participants developed T2D over a mean 26.9 ± 5.0 years of follow-up. Genotype score significantly predicted T2D in all models. Hazard ratios ranged from 1.09 per risk allele (95% confidence interval 1.03-1.15) in the basic demographic model to 1.06 (95% confidence interval 1.00-1.13) in the full model. The addition of genotype score did not improve the discrimination of the full clinical model (C statistic 0.756 without and 0.760 with genotype score). In the full model, genotype score had weak improvement in reclassification (net reclassification improvement index 0.261). CONCLUSIONS: Although a genotype score assessed among white and black adolescents is significantly associated with T2D in adulthood, it does not improve prediction over clinical risk factors. Genetic screening for T2D in its current state is not a useful addition to adolescents' clinical care.
Authors: Struan F A Grant; Gudmar Thorleifsson; Inga Reynisdottir; Rafn Benediktsson; Andrei Manolescu; Jesus Sainz; Agnar Helgason; Hreinn Stefansson; Valur Emilsson; Anna Helgadottir; Unnur Styrkarsdottir; Kristinn P Magnusson; G Bragi Walters; Ebba Palsdottir; Thorbjorg Jonsdottir; Thorunn Gudmundsdottir; Arnaldur Gylfason; Jona Saemundsdottir; Robert L Wilensky; Muredach P Reilly; Daniel J Rader; Yu Bagger; Claus Christiansen; Vilmundur Gudnason; Gunnar Sigurdsson; Unnur Thorsteinsdottir; Jeffrey R Gulcher; Augustine Kong; Kari Stefansson Journal: Nat Genet Date: 2006-01-15 Impact factor: 38.330
Authors: Maria Inês Schmidt; Bruce B Duncan; Heejung Bang; James S Pankow; Christie M Ballantyne; Sherita H Golden; Aaron R Folsom; Lloyd E Chambless Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2005-08 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: X R Pan; G W Li; Y H Hu; J X Wang; W Y Yang; Z X An; Z X Hu; J Lin; J Z Xiao; H B Cao; P A Liu; X G Jiang; Y Y Jiang; J P Wang; H Zheng; H Zhang; P H Bennett; B V Howard Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 1997-04 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: James B Meigs; Peter Shrader; Lisa M Sullivan; Jarred B McAteer; Caroline S Fox; Josée Dupuis; Alisa K Manning; Jose C Florez; Peter W F Wilson; Ralph B D'Agostino; L Adrienne Cupples Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2008-11-20 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Valeriya Lyssenko; Anna Jonsson; Peter Almgren; Nicoló Pulizzi; Bo Isomaa; Tiinamaija Tuomi; Göran Berglund; David Altshuler; Peter Nilsson; Leif Groop Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2008-11-20 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Soo Heon Kwak; Sung Hee Choi; Kyunga Kim; Hye Seung Jung; Young Min Cho; Soo Lim; Nam H Cho; Seong Yeon Kim; Kyong Soo Park; Hak C Jang Journal: Diabetologia Date: 2013-09-22 Impact factor: 10.122
Authors: Alena Stančáková; Teemu Kuulasmaa; Johanna Kuusisto; Karen L Mohlke; Francis S Collins; Michael Boehnke; Markku Laakso Journal: Diabetologia Date: 2017-06-01 Impact factor: 10.122