Literature DB >> 21499901

The continuous end-state comfort effect: weighted integration of multiple biases.

Oliver Herbort1, Martin V Butz.   

Abstract

The grasp orientation when grasping an object is frequently aligned in anticipation of the intended rotation of the object (end-state comfort effect). We analyzed grasp orientation selection in a continuous task to determine the mechanisms underlying the end-state comfort effect. Participants had to grasp a box by a circular handle-which allowed for arbitrary grasp orientations-and then had to rotate the box by various angles. Experiments 1 and 2 revealed both that the rotation's direction considerably determined grasp orientations and that end-postures varied considerably. Experiments 3 and 4 further showed that visual stimuli and initial arm postures biased grasp orientations if the intended rotation could be easily achieved. The data show that end-state comfort but also other factors determine grasp orientation selection. A simple mechanism that integrates multiple weighted biases can account for the data.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21499901     DOI: 10.1007/s00426-011-0334-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Res        ISSN: 0340-0727


  37 in total

Review 1.  Optimality principles in sensorimotor control.

Authors:  Emanuel Todorov
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 24.884

2.  Forearm torque strengths and discomfort profiles in pronation and supination.

Authors:  L W O'Sullivan; T J Gallwey
Journal:  Ergonomics       Date:  2005-05-15       Impact factor: 2.778

3.  Developing motor planning over ages.

Authors:  Jean-Pierre Thibaut; Lucette Toussaint
Journal:  J Exp Child Psychol       Date:  2009-11-17

4.  Brief report: planning problems in autism at the level of motor control.

Authors:  C Hughes
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  1996-02

5.  From cognition to biomechanics and back: the end-state comfort effect and the middle-is-faster effect.

Authors:  D A Rosenbaum; C M van Heugten; G E Caldwell
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  1996-10

6.  Moving effortlessly in three dimensions: does Donders' law apply to arm movement?

Authors:  J F Soechting; C A Buneo; U Herrmann; M Flanders
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  The coordination of arm movements: an experimentally confirmed mathematical model.

Authors:  T Flash; N Hogan
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1985-07       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Where grasps are made reveals how grasps are planned: generation and recall of motor plans.

Authors:  Rajal G Cohen; David A Rosenbaum
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-04-08       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Monkey see, monkey plan, monkey do: the end-state comfort effect in cotton-top tamarins (Saguinus oedipus).

Authors:  Daniel J Weiss; Jason D Wark; David A Rosenbaum
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2007-12

10.  The end-state comfort effect in young children.

Authors:  Carola F Adalbjornsson; Mark G Fischman; Mary E Rudisill
Journal:  Res Q Exerc Sport       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 2.500

View more
  12 in total

1.  Habitual and goal-directed factors in (everyday) object handling.

Authors:  Oliver Herbort; Martin V Butz
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-07-12       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  The contribution of cognitive, kinematic, and dynamic factors to anticipatory grasp selection.

Authors:  Oliver Herbort; Martin V Butz; Wilfried Kunde
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-02-18       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Anticipatory eye fixations reveal tool knowledge for tool interaction.

Authors:  Anna Belardinelli; Marissa Barabas; Marc Himmelbach; Martin V Butz
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-04-11       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Social categorization and cooperation in motor joint action: evidence for a joint end-state comfort.

Authors:  Dominik Dötsch; Anna Schubö
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-05-12       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  The influence of reducing intermediate target constraints on grasp posture planning during a three-segment object manipulation task.

Authors:  Christian Seegelke; Charmayne M L Hughes; Andreas Knoblauch; Thomas Schack
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-11-05       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Inverting the planning gradient: adjustment of grasps to late segments of multi-step object manipulations.

Authors:  Hanna Mathew; Wilfried Kunde; Oliver Herbort
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-02-23       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Individual differences in motor planning during a multi-segment object manipulation task.

Authors:  Christian Seegelke; Charmayne M L Hughes; Christoph Schütz; Thomas Schack
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-08-11       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Planning grasps for object manipulation: integrating internal preferences and external constraints.

Authors:  Oliver Herbort; Martin V Butz
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2015-09

Review 9.  Manual (a)symmetries in grasp posture planning: a short review.

Authors:  Christian Seegelke; Charmayne Mary Lee Hughes; Thomas Schack
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-12-15

10.  Toward a Unified Sub-symbolic Computational Theory of Cognition.

Authors:  Martin V Butz
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-06-21
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.