Literature DB >> 25963752

Social categorization and cooperation in motor joint action: evidence for a joint end-state comfort.

Dominik Dötsch1, Anna Schubö.   

Abstract

The present study investigated to what extent group membership affects an actor's representation of their partner's task in cooperative joint action. Participants performed a joint pick-and-place task in a naturalistic, breakfast-table-like paradigm which allowed the demonstration of varying degrees of cooperation. Participants transported a wooden cup from one end of a table to the other, with one actor moving it to an intermediate position from where their partner transported it to a goal position. Hand and finger movements were recorded via 3D motion tracking to assess actors' cooperative behavior. Before the joint action task was performed, participants were categorized as belonging to the same or to different groups, supposedly based on an assessment of their cognitive processing styles. Results showed that the orientation of the actors' fingers when picking up the cup was affected by its required angle at the goal position. When placing the cup at the intermediate position, most actors adapted the rotation of the cup's handle to the joint action goal, thereby facilitating the partner's subsequent movement. Male actors demonstrated such cooperative behavior only when performing the task together with an ingroup partner, while female actors demonstrated cooperative behavior irrespective of social categorization. These results suggest that actors tend to represent a partner's end-state comfort and integrate it into their own movement planning in cooperative joint action. However, social factors like group membership may modulate this tendency.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25963752     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-015-4301-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  29 in total

1.  Action co-representation: the joint SNARC effect.

Authors:  Silke Atmaca; Natalie Sebanz; Wolfgang Prinz; Günther Knoblich
Journal:  Soc Neurosci       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 2.083

2.  The continuous end-state comfort effect: weighted integration of multiple biases.

Authors:  Oliver Herbort; Martin V Butz
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2011-04-17

3.  Response selection during a joint action task.

Authors:  Matthew Ray; Timothy N Welsh
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 1.328

4.  From cognition to biomechanics and back: the end-state comfort effect and the middle-is-faster effect.

Authors:  D A Rosenbaum; C M van Heugten; G E Caldwell
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  1996-10

5.  Where grasps are made reveals how grasps are planned: generation and recall of motor plans.

Authors:  Rajal G Cohen; David A Rosenbaum
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-04-08       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Motion coordination affects movement parameters in a joint pick-and-place task.

Authors:  Cordula Vesper; Alexander Soutschek; Anna Schubo
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2009-06-01       Impact factor: 2.143

7.  Kinematics fingerprints of leader and follower role-taking during cooperative joint actions.

Authors:  Lucia Maria Sacheli; Emmanuele Tidoni; Enea Francesco Pavone; Salvatore Maria Aglioti; Matteo Candidi
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-03-17       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Higher-order action planning for individual and joint object manipulations.

Authors:  Marlene Meyer; Robrecht P R D van der Wel; Sabine Hunnius
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-01-30       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Perspective taking eliminates differences in co-representation of out-group members' actions.

Authors:  Barbara C N Müller; Simone Kühn; Rick B van Baaren; Ron Dotsch; Marcel Brass; Ap Dijksterhuis
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-04-05       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Joint-action coordination in transferring objects.

Authors:  Ruud G J Meulenbroek; Jurjen Bosga; Majken Hulstijn; Stephan Miedl
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-01-26       Impact factor: 1.972

View more
  6 in total

1.  Competition in the Brain. The Contribution of EEG and fNIRS Modulation and Personality Effects in Social Ranking.

Authors:  Michela Balconi; Maria E Vanutelli
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-10-13

2.  How You Move Is What I See: Planning an Action Biases a Partner's Visual Search.

Authors:  Dominik Dötsch; Cordula Vesper; Anna Schubö
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-02-07

3.  Brains in Competition: Improved Cognitive Performance and Inter-Brain Coupling by Hyperscanning Paradigm with Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy.

Authors:  Michela Balconi; Maria E Vanutelli
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2017-08-31       Impact factor: 3.558

4.  Rationality in Joint Action: Maximizing Coefficiency in Coordination.

Authors:  Georgina Török; Barbara Pomiechowska; Gergely Csibra; Natalie Sebanz
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2019-05-14

5.  Grip-force modulation in human-to-human object handovers: effects of sensory and kinematic manipulations.

Authors:  Falko R Döhring; Hermann Müller; Michael Joch
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-12-24       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Multiple Frames of Reference Are Used During the Selection and Planning of a Sequential Joint Action.

Authors:  Matthew Ray; Timothy N Welsh
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-05-01
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.