Literature DB >> 18031413

Monkey see, monkey plan, monkey do: the end-state comfort effect in cotton-top tamarins (Saguinus oedipus).

Daniel J Weiss1, Jason D Wark, David A Rosenbaum.   

Abstract

The way human adults grasp objects is typically influenced by their knowledge of what they intend to do with the objects. This influence is reflected in the end-state comfort effect: Actors adopt initially uncomfortable postures to accommodate later task demands. Although many experiments have demonstrated this effect, to the best of our knowledge its phylogenetic roots have not been investigated. In two experiments, we tested whether 9 cotton-top tamarin monkeys would show the end-state comfort effect. We did so by presenting the monkeys with a small cup containing a marshmallow. The cup was suspended in different orientations. The monkeys inhibited their natural grasping tendencies and adopted unusual grasping postures to accommodate subsequent task requirements, thus demonstrating the end-state comfort effect. This outcome provides evidence for more sophisticated motor planning than has previously been ascribed to this and related species.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18031413     DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.02026.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Sci        ISSN: 0956-7976


  21 in total

1.  Pouring or chilling a bottle of wine: an fMRI study on the prospective planning of object-directed actions.

Authors:  M van Elk; S Viswanathan; H T van Schie; H Bekkering; S T Grafton
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-02-18       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Reversal of bimanual feedback responses with changes in task goal.

Authors:  Jörn Diedrichsen; Samantha Gush
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2008-11-05       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  The continuous end-state comfort effect: weighted integration of multiple biases.

Authors:  Oliver Herbort; Martin V Butz
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2011-04-17

4.  Habitual and goal-directed factors in (everyday) object handling.

Authors:  Oliver Herbort; Martin V Butz
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-07-12       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Accommodation of end-state comfort reveals subphonemic planning in speech.

Authors:  Donald Derrick; Bryan Gick
Journal:  Phonetica       Date:  2015-02-19       Impact factor: 1.759

Review 6.  Precrastination: The fierce urgency of now.

Authors:  Edward A Wasserman
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 1.986

Review 7.  Cognition, action, and object manipulation.

Authors:  David A Rosenbaum; Kate M Chapman; Matthias Weigelt; Daniel J Weiss; Robrecht van der Wel
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2012-03-26       Impact factor: 17.737

8.  Evidence for motor planning in monkeys: rhesus macaques select efficient grips when transporting spoons.

Authors:  Eliza L Nelson; Neil E Berthier; Christina M Metevier; Melinda A Novak
Journal:  Dev Sci       Date:  2011-03-24

Review 9.  The marmoset monkey as a model for visual neuroscience.

Authors:  Jude F Mitchell; David A Leopold
Journal:  Neurosci Res       Date:  2015-02-13       Impact factor: 3.304

10.  Pulling to scale: Motor planning for sequences of repeated actions by cotton-top tamarins (Saguinus oedipus).

Authors:  Kate M Chapman; Daniel J Weiss
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  2013-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.