Literature DB >> 21748333

Habitual and goal-directed factors in (everyday) object handling.

Oliver Herbort1, Martin V Butz.   

Abstract

A habitual and a goal-directed system contribute to action selection in the human CNS. We examined to which extent both systems interact when selecting grasps for handling everyday objects. In Experiment 1, an upright or inverted cup had to be rotated or moved. To-be-rotated upright cups were more frequently grasped with a thumb-up grasp, which is habitually used to hold an upright cup, than inverted cups, which are not associated with a specific grasp. Additionally, grasp selection depended on the overarching goal of the movement sequence (rotation vs. transport) according to the end-state comfort principle. This shows that the habitual system and the goal-directed system both contribute to grasp selection. Experiment 2 revealed that this object-orientation-dependent grasp selection was present for movements of the dominant- and non-dominant hand. In Experiment 3, different everyday objects had to be moved or rotated. Only if different orientations of an object were associated with different habitual grasps, the grasp selection depended on the object orientation. Additionally, grasp selection was affected by the horizontal direction of the forthcoming movement. In sum, the experiments provide evidence that the interaction between the habitual and the goal-directed system determines grasp selection for the interaction with every-day objects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21748333     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-011-2787-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  30 in total

1.  Problem solving in infancy: the emergence of an action plan.

Authors:  M E McCarty; R K Clifton; R R Collard
Journal:  Dev Psychol       Date:  1999-07

2.  End-state comfort in bimanual object manipulation.

Authors:  Matthias Weigelt; Wilfried Kunde; Wolfgang Prinz
Journal:  Exp Psychol       Date:  2006

3.  Exploiting redundancy for flexible behavior: unsupervised learning in a modular sensorimotor control architecture.

Authors:  Martin V Butz; Oliver Herbort; Joachim Hoffmann
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 8.934

4.  Developing motor planning over ages.

Authors:  Jean-Pierre Thibaut; Lucette Toussaint
Journal:  J Exp Child Psychol       Date:  2009-11-17

Review 5.  Goal-directed instrumental action: contingency and incentive learning and their cortical substrates.

Authors:  B W Balleine; A Dickinson
Journal:  Neuropharmacology       Date:  1998 Apr-May       Impact factor: 5.250

6.  From cognition to biomechanics and back: the end-state comfort effect and the middle-is-faster effect.

Authors:  D A Rosenbaum; C M van Heugten; G E Caldwell
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  1996-10

7.  Planning an action.

Authors:  M Gentilucci; A Negrotti; M Gangitano
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Intention-based and stimulus-based mechanisms in action selection.

Authors:  Florian Waszak; Edmund Wascher; Peter Keller; Iring Koch; Gisa Aschersleben; David A Rosenbaum; Wolfgang Prinz
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-12-15       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Where grasps are made reveals how grasps are planned: generation and recall of motor plans.

Authors:  Rajal G Cohen; David A Rosenbaum
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-04-08       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Monkey see, monkey plan, monkey do: the end-state comfort effect in cotton-top tamarins (Saguinus oedipus).

Authors:  Daniel J Weiss; Jason D Wark; David A Rosenbaum
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2007-12
View more
  19 in total

1.  Representation of grasp postures and anticipatory motor planning in children.

Authors:  Tino Stöckel; Charmayne M L Hughes; Thomas Schack
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2011-11-11

2.  Pouring or chilling a bottle of wine: an fMRI study on the prospective planning of object-directed actions.

Authors:  M van Elk; S Viswanathan; H T van Schie; H Bekkering; S T Grafton
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-02-18       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Hemispheric lateralization does not affect the cognitive and mechanical cost of a sequential motor task.

Authors:  Christoph Schütz; Thomas Schack
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2019-09-27       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  The relation between measures of cognitive and motor functioning in 5- to 6-year-old children.

Authors:  Tino Stöckel; Charmayne M L Hughes
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2015-03-28

5.  Dissociable brain systems mediate vicarious learning of stimulus-response and action-outcome contingencies.

Authors:  Mimi Liljeholm; Ciara J Molloy; John P O'Doherty
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-07-18       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  The contribution of cognitive, kinematic, and dynamic factors to anticipatory grasp selection.

Authors:  Oliver Herbort; Martin V Butz; Wilfried Kunde
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-02-18       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Anticipatory eye fixations reveal tool knowledge for tool interaction.

Authors:  Anna Belardinelli; Marissa Barabas; Marc Himmelbach; Martin V Butz
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-04-11       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  The development of tool use: Planning for end-state comfort.

Authors:  David M Comalli; Rachel Keen; Evelyn S Abraham; Victoria J Foo; Mei-Hua Lee; Karen E Adolph
Journal:  Dev Psychol       Date:  2016-11

9.  Planning grasps for object manipulation: integrating internal preferences and external constraints.

Authors:  Oliver Herbort; Martin V Butz
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2015-09

10.  The influence of object size on second-order planning in an overturned cup task.

Authors:  Sara M Scharoun Benson
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2021-04-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.