Literature DB >> 24534913

The contribution of cognitive, kinematic, and dynamic factors to anticipatory grasp selection.

Oliver Herbort1, Martin V Butz, Wilfried Kunde.   

Abstract

Object-directed grasping movements are usually adjusted in anticipation of the direction and extent of a subsequent object rotation. Such anticipatory grasp selections have been mostly explained in terms of the kinematics of the arm movement. However, object rotations of different directions and extents also differ in their dynamics and in how the tasks are represented. Here, we examined how the dynamics, the kinematics, and the cognitive representation of an object manipulation affect anticipatory grasp selections. We asked participants to grasp an object and rotate it by different angles and in different directions. To examine the influence of dynamic factors, we varied the object's weight. To examine the influence of the cognitive task representation, we instructed identical object rotations as either toward-top or away-from-top rotations. While instructed object rotation and cognitive task representation did affect grasp selection over the entire course of the experiment, a rather small effect of object weight only appeared late in the experiment. We suggest that grasp selections are determined on different levels. The representation of the kinematics of the object movement determines grasp selection on a trial-by-trial basis. The effect of object weight affects grasp selection by a slower adaptation process. This result implies that even simple motor acts, such as grasping, can only be understood when cognitive factors, such as the task representation, are taken into account.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24534913     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-014-3849-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  28 in total

1.  Independent learning of internal models for kinematic and dynamic control of reaching.

Authors:  J W Krakauer; M F Ghilardi; C Ghez
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 24.884

2.  Optimal feedback control as a theory of motor coordination.

Authors:  Emanuel Todorov; Michael I Jordan
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 24.884

3.  Time course of movement planning: selection of handgrips for object manipulation.

Authors:  D A Rosenbaum; J Vaughan; H J Barnes; M J Jorgensen
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 3.051

4.  Relationship between unconstrained arm movements and single-neuron firing in the macaque motor cortex.

Authors:  Tyson N Aflalo; Michael S A Graziano
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2007-03-14       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Action goal selection and motor planning can be dissociated by tool use.

Authors:  Thérèse Collins; Tobias Schicke; Brigitte Röder
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2008-11-13

6.  When do motor behaviors (mis)match affective stimuli? An evaluative coding view of approach and avoidance reactions.

Authors:  Andreas B Eder; Klaus Rothermund
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2008-05

7.  The effects of task and content on digit placement on a bottle.

Authors:  Céline Crajé; Jamie R Lukos; Caterina Ansuini; Andrew M Gordon; Marco Santello
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-05-06       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  The continuous end-state comfort effect: weighted integration of multiple biases.

Authors:  Oliver Herbort; Martin V Butz
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2011-04-17

9.  From cognition to biomechanics and back: the end-state comfort effect and the middle-is-faster effect.

Authors:  D A Rosenbaum; C M van Heugten; G E Caldwell
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  1996-10

10.  Bimanual grasp planning reflects changing rather than fixed constraint dominance.

Authors:  Robrecht P R D van der Wel; David A Rosenbaum
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-07-24       Impact factor: 1.972

View more
  3 in total

1.  Inverting the planning gradient: adjustment of grasps to late segments of multi-step object manipulations.

Authors:  Hanna Mathew; Wilfried Kunde; Oliver Herbort
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-02-23       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Observing end-state comfort favorable actions does not modulate action plan recall.

Authors:  Christian Seegelke
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-01-29

3.  Toward a Unified Sub-symbolic Computational Theory of Cognition.

Authors:  Martin V Butz
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-06-21
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.