Literature DB >> 27068808

Anticipatory eye fixations reveal tool knowledge for tool interaction.

Anna Belardinelli1, Marissa Barabas2, Marc Himmelbach2, Martin V Butz3,4.   

Abstract

Action-oriented eye-tracking studies have shown that eye fixations reveal much about current behavioral intentions. The eyes typically fixate those positions of a tool or an object where the fingers will be placed next, or those positions in a scene, where obstacles need to be avoided to successfully reach or transport a tool or object. Here, we asked to what extent eye fixations can also reveal active cognitive inference processes, which are expected to integrate bottom-up visual information with internal knowledge for planning suitable object interactions task-dependently. In accordance to the available literature, we expected that task-relevant knowledge will include sensorimotor, semantic, and mechanical aspects. To investigate if and in which way this internal knowledge influences eye fixation behavior while planning an object interaction, we presented pictures of familiar and unfamiliar tools and instructed participants to either pantomime 'lifting' or 'using' the respective tool. When confronted with unfamiliar tools, participants fixated the tool's effector part closer and longer in comparison with familiar tools. This difference was particularly prominent during 'using' trials when compared with 'lifting' trials. We suggest that this difference indicates that the brain actively extracts mechanical information about the unknown tool in order to infer its appropriate usage. Moreover, the successive fixations over a trial indicate that a dynamic, task-oriented, active cognitive process unfolds, which integrates available tool knowledge with visually gathered information to plan and determine the currently intended tool interaction.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anticipation; Eye movements; Sensorimotor/mechanical knowledge; Tool use; Vision for action

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27068808     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-016-4646-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  34 in total

1.  When does the Titchener Circles illusion exert an effect on grasping?. Two- and three-dimensional targets.

Authors:  Rebecca M Kwok; Oliver J Braddick
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 3.139

2.  Neural representations of pantomimed and actual tool use: evidence from an event-related fMRI study.

Authors:  J Hermsdörfer; G Terlinden; M Mühlau; G Goldenberg; A M Wohlschläger
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2007-03-31       Impact factor: 6.556

3.  Unusual use of objects after unilateral brain damage: the technical reasoning model.

Authors:  François Osiurak; Christophe Jarry; Philippe Allain; Ghislaine Aubin; Frédérique Etcharry-Bouyx; Isabelle Richard; Isabelle Bernard; Didier Le Gall
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2008-11-08       Impact factor: 4.027

4.  Why do the eyes prefer the index finger? Simultaneous recording of eye and hand movements during precision grasping.

Authors:  Cristiana Cavina-Pratesi; Constanze Hesse
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2013-04-18       Impact factor: 2.240

5.  A case of ideational apraxia with impairment of object use and preservation of object pantomime.

Authors:  N Motomura; A Yamadori
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 4.027

6.  Grasping two-dimensional images and three-dimensional objects in visual-form agnosia.

Authors:  David A Westwood; James Danckert; Philip Servos; Melvyn A Goodale
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2002-04-10       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Movement planning in prehension: do intended actions influence the initial reach and grasp movement?

Authors:  Claudia Armbrüster; Will Spijkers
Journal:  Motor Control       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 1.422

8.  Tool use and mechanical problem solving in apraxia.

Authors:  G Goldenberg; S Hagmann
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 3.139

9.  Recognition and imitation of pantomimed motor acts after unilateral parietal and premotor lesions: a perspective on apraxia.

Authors:  U Halsband; J Schmitt; M Weyers; F Binkofski; G Grützner; H J Freund
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 3.139

Review 10.  Tool use disorders after left brain damage.

Authors:  Josselin Baumard; François Osiurak; Mathieu Lesourd; Didier Le Gall
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-05-21
View more
  5 in total

1.  Effects of Tool Novelty and Action Demands on Gaze Searching During Tool Observation.

Authors:  Yoshinori Tamaki; Satoshi Nobusako; Yusaku Takamura; Yu Miyawaki; Moe Terada; Shu Morioka
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2020-11-23

2.  Gaze-Based Intention Estimation for Shared Autonomy in Pick-and-Place Tasks.

Authors:  Stefan Fuchs; Anna Belardinelli
Journal:  Front Neurorobot       Date:  2021-04-16       Impact factor: 2.650

3.  Action goals and the praxis network: an fMRI study.

Authors:  Bartosz Michalowski; Mikolaj Buchwald; Michal Klichowski; Maciej Ras; Gregory Kroliczak
Journal:  Brain Struct Funct       Date:  2022-06-22       Impact factor: 3.748

4.  Toward a Unified Sub-symbolic Computational Theory of Cognition.

Authors:  Martin V Butz
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-06-21

5.  Gloss and Speed Judgments Yield Different Fine Tuning of Saccadic Sampling in Dynamic Scenes.

Authors:  Matteo Toscani; Ezgi I Yücel; Katja Doerschner
Journal:  Iperception       Date:  2019-12-15
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.