Literature DB >> 28233050

Inverting the planning gradient: adjustment of grasps to late segments of multi-step object manipulations.

Hanna Mathew1, Wilfried Kunde1, Oliver Herbort2.   

Abstract

When someone grasps an object, the grasp depends on the intended object manipulation and usually facilitates it. If several object manipulation steps are planned, the first step has been reported to primarily determine the grasp selection. We address whether the grasp can be aligned to the second step, if the second step's requirements exceed those of the first step. Participants grasped and rotated a dial first by a small extent and then by various extents in the opposite direction, without releasing the dial. On average, when the requirements of the first and the second step were similar, participants mostly aligned the grasp to the first step. When the requirements of the second step were considerably higher, participants aligned the grasp to the second step, even though the first step still had a considerable impact. Participants employed two different strategies. One subgroup initially aligned the grasp to the first step and then ceased adjusting the grasp to either step. Another group also initially aligned the grasp to the first step and then switched to aligning it primarily to the second step. The data suggest that participants are more likely to switch to the latter strategy when they experienced more awkward arm postures. In summary, grasp selections for multi-step object manipulations can be aligned to the second object manipulation step, if the requirements of this step clearly exceed those of the first step and if participants have some experience with the task.

Entities:  

Keywords:  End-state comfort effect; Grasping; Movement planning; Object manipulation; Sequential action

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28233050     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-017-4892-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  19 in total

1.  Motor planning in bimanual object manipulation: two plans for two hands?

Authors:  Loes Janssen; Céline Crajé; Matthias Weigelt; Bert Steenbergen
Journal:  Motor Control       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 1.422

2.  An implicit plan overrides an explicit strategy during visuomotor adaptation.

Authors:  Pietro Mazzoni; John W Krakauer
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2006-04-05       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Too much anticipation? Large anticipatory adjustments of grasping movements to minimal object manipulations.

Authors:  Oliver Herbort
Journal:  Hum Mov Sci       Date:  2015-05-21       Impact factor: 2.161

4.  The continuous end-state comfort effect: weighted integration of multiple biases.

Authors:  Oliver Herbort; Martin V Butz
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2011-04-17

5.  From cognition to biomechanics and back: the end-state comfort effect and the middle-is-faster effect.

Authors:  D A Rosenbaum; C M van Heugten; G E Caldwell
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  1996-10

6.  A cognitive framework for explaining serial processing and sequence execution strategies.

Authors:  Willem B Verwey; Charles H Shea; David L Wright
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2015-02

7.  Grasp posture planning during multi-segment object manipulation tasks - interaction between cognitive and biomechanical factors.

Authors:  Christian Seegelke; Charmayne M L Hughes; Andreas Knoblauch; Thomas Schack
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  2013-10-02

8.  Cognitive framing in action.

Authors:  John M Huhn; Cory Adam Potts; David A Rosenbaum
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2016-03-10

9.  Optimal control in the critical phase of movement: a functional approach to motor planning processes.

Authors:  Stefan Künzell; Claudia Augste; Matthias Hering; Sabine Maier; Anna-May Meinzinger; Dominicus Sießmeir
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  2013-05-31

Review 10.  Calculating and reporting effect sizes to facilitate cumulative science: a practical primer for t-tests and ANOVAs.

Authors:  Daniël Lakens
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-11-26
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.