Literature DB >> 15071711

Where grasps are made reveals how grasps are planned: generation and recall of motor plans.

Rajal G Cohen1, David A Rosenbaum.   

Abstract

The end-state comfort effect (Rosenbaum et al. 1990, 1992, 1993, 1996) predicts that people will grasp an object for transport in a way that allows joints to be in mid-range at the end of the transport. When participants in the present study took hold of a vertical cylinder to move it to a new position, grasp heights on the cylinder were inversely related to the height of the target position, as predicted by the end-state comfort effect. This demonstrates that where people grasp objects can give insight into the planning of movement. In the computational model of motor planning developed by Rosenbaum et al. (1995, 2001) it is assumed that goal postures are planned by a two-stage process of recall and generation. The distinction between recall and generation had not so far been tested. In the present study, the pattern of grasp heights in successive transports was consistent with the view that participants generated a plan the first time they moved the cylinder between two points, and that they subsequently recalled what they had done before, making small adjustments to that recalled plan. This outcome provides evidence for distinct effects of recall and generation on movement planning.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15071711     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-004-1862-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  20 in total

1.  Dynamic illusion effects in a reaching task: evidence for separate visual representations in the planning and control of reaching.

Authors:  S R Glover; P Dixon
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 3.332

Review 2.  An instance theory of attention and memory.

Authors:  Gordon D Logan
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 8.934

Review 3.  Computational motor control and human factors: modeling movements in real and possible environments.

Authors:  Steven A Jax; David A Rosenbaum; Jonathan Vaughan; Ruud G J Meulenbroek
Journal:  Hum Factors       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 2.888

4.  Orienting the finger opposition space during prehension movements.

Authors:  G E Stelmach; U Castiello; M Jeannerod
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 1.328

5.  From cognition to biomechanics and back: the end-state comfort effect and the middle-is-faster effect.

Authors:  D A Rosenbaum; C M van Heugten; G E Caldwell
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  1996-10

6.  The motor system does not learn the dynamics of the arm by rote memorization of past experience.

Authors:  M A Conditt; F Gandolfo; F A Mussa-Ivaldi
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Constraints on human arm movement trajectories.

Authors:  R G Marteniuk; C L MacKenzie; M Jeannerod; S Athenes; C Dugas
Journal:  Can J Psychol       Date:  1987-09

8.  Is there an optimal arm posture? Deterioration of finger localization precision and comfort sensation in extreme arm-joint postures.

Authors:  Y Rossetti; C Meckler; C Prablanc
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 9.  Planning reaches by evaluating stored postures.

Authors:  D A Rosenbaum; L D Loukopoulos; R G Meulenbroek; J Vaughan; S E Engelbrecht
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 8.934

10.  Development of human precision grip. II. Anticipatory control of isometric forces targeted for object's weight.

Authors:  H Forssberg; H Kinoshita; A C Eliasson; R S Johansson; G Westling; A M Gordon
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 1.972

View more
  77 in total

1.  Pouring or chilling a bottle of wine: an fMRI study on the prospective planning of object-directed actions.

Authors:  M van Elk; S Viswanathan; H T van Schie; H Bekkering; S T Grafton
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-02-18       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Event coding and motor priming: how attentional modulation may influence binding across action properties.

Authors:  Brenda Ocampo; David R Painter; Ada Kritikos
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-03-22       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  An investigation into manual asymmetries in grasp behavior and kinematics during an object manipulation task.

Authors:  Christian Seegelke; Charmayne M L Hughes; Thomas Schack
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-09-22       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 4.  Motor abilities in autism: a review using a computational context.

Authors:  Emma Gowen; Antonia Hamilton
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  2013-02

5.  Observing functional actions affects semantic processing of tools: evidence of a motor-to-semantic priming.

Authors:  Francesco De Bellis; Antonia Ferrara; Domenico Errico; Francesco Panico; Laura Sagliano; Massimiliano Conson; Luigi Trojano
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-09-10       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Coordination of locomotion and prehension.

Authors:  Robrecht P R D van der Wel; David A Rosenbaum
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  An object for an action, the same object for other actions: effects on hand shaping.

Authors:  Caterina Ansuini; Livia Giosa; Luca Turella; Gianmarco Altoè; Umberto Castiello
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-10-02       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Methodological problems undermine tests of the ideo-motor conjecture.

Authors:  Erik Jansson; Andrew D Wilson; Justin H G Williams; Mark Mon-Williams
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-06-26       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Planning for manual positioning: the end-state comfort effect for manual abduction-adduction.

Authors:  Wei Zhang; David A Rosenbaum
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-08-29       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Recall of observed actions modulates the end-state comfort effect just like recall of one's own actions.

Authors:  David Dignath; Andreas B Eder
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-09-17       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.