Literature DB >> 21476673

Speaker compensation for local perturbation of fricative acoustic feedback.

Elizabeth D Casserly1.   

Abstract

Feedback perturbation studies of speech acoustics have revealed a great deal about how speakers monitor and control their productions of segmental (e.g., formant frequencies) and non-segmental (e.g., pitch) linguistic elements. The majority of previous work, however, overlooks the role of acoustic feedback in consonant production and makes use of acoustic manipulations that effect either entire utterances or the entire acoustic signal, rather than more temporally and phonetically restricted alterations. This study, therefore, seeks to expand the feedback perturbation literature by examining perturbation of consonant acoustics that is applied in a time-restricted and phonetically specific manner. The spectral center of the alveopalatal fricative [∫] produced in vowel-fricative-vowel nonwords was incrementally raised until it reached the potential for [s]-like frequencies, but the characteristics of high-frequency energy outside the target fricative remained unaltered. An "offline," more widely accessible signal processing method was developed to perform this manipulation. The local feedback perturbation resulted in changes to speakers' fricative production that were more variable, idiosyncratic, and restricted than the compensation seen in more global acoustic manipulations reported in the literature. Implications and interpretations of the results, as well as future directions for research based on the findings, are discussed.

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21476673      PMCID: PMC3087395          DOI: 10.1121/1.3552883

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  23 in total

1.  Effects of frequency-shifted auditory feedback on voice F0 contours in syllables.

Authors:  Thomas M Donath; Ulrich Natke; Karl Th Kalveram
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Perceptual calibration of F0 production: evidence from feedback perturbation.

Authors:  J A Jones; K G Munhall
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Compensation for pitch-shifted auditory feedback during the production of Mandarin tone sequences.

Authors:  Yi Xu; Charles R Larson; Jay J Bauer; Timothy C Hain
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Perceptual recalibration of speech sounds following speech motor learning.

Authors:  Douglas M Shiller; Marc Sato; Vincent L Gracco; Shari R Baum
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Sensorimotor adaptation of speech I: Compensation and adaptation.

Authors:  John F Houde; Michael I Jordan
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 2.297

6.  Functionally specific articulatory cooperation following jaw perturbations during speech: evidence for coordinative structures.

Authors:  J A Kelso; B Tuller; E Vatikiotis-Bateson; C A Fowler
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1984-12       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  Effects of vocalic formant transitions and vowel quality on the English [s]-[ŝ] boundary.

Authors:  D H Whalen
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1981-01       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Immediate compensation in bite-block speech.

Authors:  C A Fowler; M T Turvey
Journal:  Phonetica       Date:  1981       Impact factor: 1.759

9.  Effects of frequency-shifted feedback on the pitch of vocal productions.

Authors:  J L ELman
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1981-07       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Influence of vocalic context on perception of the [zh]-[s] distinction.

Authors:  V A Mann; B H Repp
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1980-09
View more
  7 in total

1.  Effects of real-time cochlear implant simulation on speech production.

Authors:  Elizabeth D Casserly
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Temporal control and compensation for perturbed voicing feedback.

Authors:  Takashi Mitsuya; Ewen N MacDonald; Kevin G Munhall
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Supra-Segmental Changes in Speech Production as a Result of Spectral Feedback Degradation: Comparison with Lombard Speech.

Authors:  Elizabeth D Casserly; Yeling Wang; Nicholas Celestin; Lily Talesnick; David B Pisoni
Journal:  Lang Speech       Date:  2017-06-27       Impact factor: 1.500

4.  Modulation of auditory-motor learning in response to formant perturbation as a function of delayed auditory feedback.

Authors:  Takashi Mitsuya; Kevin G Munhall; David W Purcell
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  The influence of bistable auditory feedback on speech motor control.

Authors:  Takashi Mitsuya; K G Munhall
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2019-10-03       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Auditory Feedback Is Used for Adaptation and Compensation in Speech Timing.

Authors:  Robin Karlin; Chris Naber; Benjamin Parrell
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2021-07-26       Impact factor: 2.297

7.  Auditory feedback of one's own voice is used for high-level semantic monitoring: the "self-comprehension" hypothesis.

Authors:  Andreas Lind; Lars Hall; Björn Breidegard; Christian Balkenius; Petter Johansson
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-03-28       Impact factor: 3.169

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.