Literature DB >> 7432999

Influence of vocalic context on perception of the [zh]-[s] distinction.

V A Mann, B H Repp.   

Abstract

Mesh:

Year:  1980        PMID: 7432999     DOI: 10.3758/bf03204377

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 0031-5117


× No keyword cloud information.
  11 in total

1.  The distribution of perceptual cues in English prevocalic fricatives.

Authors:  C LaRiviere; H Winitz; E Herriman
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1975-12

2.  Anticipatory coarticulation: some implications from a study of lip rounding.

Authors:  F Bell-Berti; K S Harris
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1979-05       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  The duration of (s) in English words.

Authors:  D Klatt
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1974-03

4.  Perception of temporal order in speech: the role of vowel transitions.

Authors:  R A Cole; B Scott
Journal:  Can J Psychol       Date:  1973-12

5.  Identification of speaker sex from isolated, voiceless fricatives.

Authors:  M F Schwartz
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1968-05       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Influence of preceding fricative on stop consonant perception.

Authors:  V A Mann; B H Repp
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1981-02       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Information in speech: observations on the perception of [s]-stop clusters.

Authors:  P J Bailey; Q Summerfield
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1980-08       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  Effects of vocalic formant transitions and vowel quality on the English [s]-[ŝ] boundary.

Authors:  D H Whalen
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1981-01       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Perceptual integration of acoustic cues for stop, fricative, and affricate manner.

Authors:  B H Repp; A M Liberman; T Eccardt; D Pesetsky
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1978-11       Impact factor: 3.332

10.  Some experiments on the sound of silence in phonetic perception.

Authors:  M F Dorman; L J Raphael; A M Liberman
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1979-06       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  44 in total

1.  Perceptual restoration of a "missing" speech sound: auditory induction or illusion?

Authors:  B H Repp
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1992-01

2.  Perceptual order and the effect of vocalic context of fricative perception.

Authors:  V Mann; S D Soli
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1991-05

3.  Contingent categorization in speech perception.

Authors:  Keith S Apfelbaum; Natasha Bullock-Rest; Ariane E Rhone; Allard Jongman; Bob McMurray
Journal:  Lang Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 2.331

Review 4.  The motor theory of speech perception reviewed.

Authors:  Bruno Galantucci; Carol A Fowler; M T Turvey
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2006-06

5.  The motor theory of speech perception revisited.

Authors:  Dominic W Massaro; Trevor H Chen
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2008-04

6.  Speaker compensation for local perturbation of fricative acoustic feedback.

Authors:  Elizabeth D Casserly
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Context-dependent categorical perception in a songbird.

Authors:  Robert F Lachlan; Stephen Nowicki
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-01-05       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Vowels as Islands of Reliability.

Authors:  Randy L Diehl; Keith R Kluender; Donald J Foss; Ellen M Parker; Morton A Gernsbacher
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  1987-10       Impact factor: 3.059

9.  Sensorimotor adaptation affects perceptual compensation for coarticulation.

Authors:  William L Schuerman; Srikantan Nagarajan; James M McQueen; John Houde
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  What Are You Waiting For? Real-Time Integration of Cues for Fricatives Suggests Encapsulated Auditory Memory.

Authors:  Marcus E Galle; Jamie Klein-Packard; Kayleen Schreiber; Bob McMurray
Journal:  Cogn Sci       Date:  2019-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.