Literature DB >> 19206885

Perceptual recalibration of speech sounds following speech motor learning.

Douglas M Shiller1, Marc Sato, Vincent L Gracco, Shari R Baum.   

Abstract

The functional sensorimotor nature of speech production has been demonstrated in studies examining speech adaptation to auditory and/or somatosensory feedback manipulations. These studies have focused primarily on flexible motor processes to explain their findings, without considering modifications to sensory representations resulting from the adaptation process. The present study explores whether the perceptual representation of the /s-/ contrast may be adjusted following the alteration of auditory feedback during the production of /s/-initial words. Consistent with prior studies of speech adaptation, talkers exposed to the feedback manipulation were found to adapt their motor plans for /s/-production in order to compensate for the effects of the sensory perturbation. In addition, a shift in the /s-/ category boundary was observed that reduced the functional impact of the auditory feedback manipulation by increasing the perceptual "distance" between the category boundary and subjects' altered /s/-stimuli-a pattern of perceptual adaptation that was not observed in two separate control groups. These results suggest that speech adaptation to altered auditory feedback is not limited to the motor domain, but rather involves changes in both motor output and auditory representations of speech sounds that together act to reduce the impact of the perturbation.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19206885     DOI: 10.1121/1.3058638

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  74 in total

1.  Movement goals and feedback and feedforward control mechanisms in speech production.

Authors:  Joseph S Perkell
Journal:  J Neurolinguistics       Date:  2010-03-26       Impact factor: 1.710

2.  A cross-language study of compensation in response to real-time formant perturbation.

Authors:  Takashi Mitsuya; Ewen N Macdonald; David W Purcell; Kevin G Munhall
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Adaptive auditory feedback control of the production of formant trajectories in the Mandarin triphthong /iau/ and its pattern of generalization.

Authors:  Shanqing Cai; Satrajit S Ghosh; Frank H Guenther; Joseph S Perkell
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Speech-induced suppression of evoked auditory fields in children who stutter.

Authors:  Deryk S Beal; Maher A Quraan; Douglas O Cheyne; Margot J Taylor; Vincent L Gracco; Luc F De Nil
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2010-11-21       Impact factor: 6.556

5.  Auditory prediction during speaking and listening.

Authors:  Marc Sato; Douglas M Shiller
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2018-05-07       Impact factor: 2.381

6.  There's more to speech perception than meets the ear.

Authors:  John F Houde
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-11-23       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Auditory plasticity and speech motor learning.

Authors:  Sazzad M Nasir; David J Ostry
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-11-02       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Noninvasive neurostimulation of left ventral motor cortex enhances sensorimotor adaptation in speech production.

Authors:  Terri L Scott; Laura Haenchen; Ayoub Daliri; Julia Chartove; Frank H Guenther; Tyler K Perrachione
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2020-07-29       Impact factor: 2.381

9.  Brief periods of auditory perceptual training can determine the sensory targets of speech motor learning.

Authors:  Daniel R Lametti; Sonia A Krol; Douglas M Shiller; David J Ostry
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2014-05-08

10.  Dimension-Based Statistical Learning Affects Both Speech Perception and Production.

Authors:  Matthew Lehet; Lori L Holt
Journal:  Cogn Sci       Date:  2016-09-25
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.