Literature DB >> 15376682

Compensation for pitch-shifted auditory feedback during the production of Mandarin tone sequences.

Yi Xu1, Charles R Larson, Jay J Bauer, Timothy C Hain.   

Abstract

Recent research has found that while speaking, subjects react to perturbations in pitch of voice auditory feedback by changing their voice fundamental frequency (F0) to compensate for the perceived pitch-shift. The long response latencies (150-200 ms) suggest they may be too slow to assist in on-line control of the local pitch contour patterns associated with lexical tones on a syllable-to-syllable basis. In the present study, we introduced pitch-shifted auditory feedback to native speakers of Mandarin Chinese while they produced disyllabic sequences /ma ma/ with different tonal combinations at a natural speaking rate. Voice F0 response latencies (100-150 ms) to the pitch perturbations were shorter than syllable durations reported elsewhere. Response magnitudes increased from 50 cents during static tone to 85 cents during dynamic tone productions. Response latencies and peak times decreased in phrases involving a dynamic change in F0. The larger response magnitudes and shorter latency and peak times in tasks requiring accurate, dynamic control of F0, indicate this automatic system for regulation of voice F0 may be task-dependent. These findings suggest that auditory feedback may be used to help regulate voice F0 during production of bi-tonal Mandarin phrases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15376682      PMCID: PMC1224717          DOI: 10.1121/1.1763952

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  23 in total

1.  Instructing subjects to make a voluntary response reveals the presence of two components to the audio-vocal reflex.

Authors:  T C Hain; T A Burnett; S Kiran; C R Larson; S Singh; M K Kenney
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Differential regulation of cutaneous and H-reflexes during leg cycling in humans.

Authors:  E P Zehr; K L Hesketh; R Chua
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Comparison of voice F0 responses to pitch-shift onset and offset conditions.

Authors:  C R Larson; T A Burnett; J J Bauer; S Kiran; T C Hain
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Effects of frequency-shifted auditory feedback on voice F0 contours in syllables.

Authors:  Thomas M Donath; Ulrich Natke; Karl Th Kalveram
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Effects of frequency-shifted auditory feedback on fundamental frequency of long stressed and unstressed syllables.

Authors:  U Natke; K T Kalveram
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 2.297

6.  Perceptual calibration of F0 production: evidence from feedback perturbation.

Authors:  J A Jones; K G Munhall
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Voice F0 responses to manipulations in pitch feedback.

Authors:  T A Burnett; M B Freedland; C R Larson; T C Hain
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Dynamics of intergestural timing: a perturbation study of lip-larynx coordination.

Authors:  E Saltzman; A Löfqvist; B Kay; J Kinsella-Shaw; P Rubin
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Kinematic and electromyographic responses to perturbation of the jaw.

Authors:  S Shaiman
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1989-07       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Mechanism for reflex reversal during walking in human tibialis anterior muscle revealed by single motor unit recording.

Authors:  S J De Serres; J F Yang; S K Patrick
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1995-10-01       Impact factor: 5.182

View more
  36 in total

1.  Focal manipulations of formant trajectories reveal a role of auditory feedback in the online control of both within-syllable and between-syllable speech timing.

Authors:  Shanqing Cai; Satrajit S Ghosh; Frank H Guenther; Joseph S Perkell
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-11-09       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Understanding the neural mechanisms involved in sensory control of voice production.

Authors:  Amy L Parkinson; Sabina G Flagmeier; Jordan L Manes; Charles R Larson; Bill Rogers; Donald A Robin
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2012-03-03       Impact factor: 6.556

3.  Adaptive auditory feedback control of the production of formant trajectories in the Mandarin triphthong /iau/ and its pattern of generalization.

Authors:  Shanqing Cai; Satrajit S Ghosh; Frank H Guenther; Joseph S Perkell
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Effect of tonal native language on voice fundamental frequency responses to pitch feedback perturbations during sustained vocalizations.

Authors:  Hanjun Liu; Emily Q Wang; Zhaocong Chen; Peng Liu; Charles R Larson; Dongfeng Huang
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Laryngeal muscle responses to mechanical displacement of the thyroid cartilage in humans.

Authors:  Torrey M J Loucks; Christopher J Poletto; Keith G Saxon; Christy L Ludlow
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2005-06-02

6.  Vocal responses to unanticipated perturbations in voice loudness feedback: an automatic mechanism for stabilizing voice amplitude.

Authors:  Jay J Bauer; Jay Mittal; Charles R Larson; Timothy C Hain
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Neural mechanisms underlying auditory feedback control of speech.

Authors:  Jason A Tourville; Kevin J Reilly; Frank H Guenther
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2007-10-11       Impact factor: 6.556

8.  Interactions between auditory and somatosensory feedback for voice F0 control.

Authors:  Charles R Larson; Kenneth W Altman; Hanjun Liu; Timothy C Hain
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-03-14       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Attenuation of vocal responses to pitch perturbations during Mandarin speech.

Authors:  Hanjun Liu; Yi Xu; Charles R Larson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  The role of vowel perceptual cues in compensatory responses to perturbations of speech auditory feedback.

Authors:  Kevin J Reilly; Kathleen E Dougherty
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 1.840

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.