Literature DB >> 31583433

The influence of bistable auditory feedback on speech motor control.

Takashi Mitsuya1, K G Munhall2.   

Abstract

The precision of speech production is strongly influenced by the auditory feedback of our voice. Studies have demonstrated that when speakers receive perturbed auditory feedback, they spontaneously change their articulation to reduce the difference between the intended sound and what was heard. For controlling the accuracy of vowel and consonant production, this corrective behavior reflects the intended sound's category represented in the mind. This in turn suggests that sounds that are not represented as a category would be controlled differently. The current study investigated the effect of linguistic status on controlling the production of a sound. Participants used an apparatus to produce a bistable sound, which could be heard either as a vowel or an acoustic buzz depending on the instructions. During the production of the target sound, their auditory feedback was perturbed and the change in acoustics in response to the perturbation was measured. The results showed that the group producing a linguistic target exhibited an error-reducing behavior similar to what was reported in natural vowel production, whereas the group producing a non-linguistic acoustic target exhibited an error-amplifying behavior, even when the majority in this group had noticed the perturbation and consciously tried to counteract it. Our findings indicate that access to a stable representation differentiates the perceptual organization of auditory feedback, and consequently changes how the production of the sound is controlled.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Auditory motor compensation; Sensorimotor compensation; Speech motor control; Speech production

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31583433     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-019-05657-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  30 in total

1.  Perceptual calibration of F0 production: evidence from feedback perturbation.

Authors:  J A Jones; K G Munhall
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Somatosensory precision in speech production.

Authors:  Sazzad M Nasir; David J Ostry
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2006-10-10       Impact factor: 10.834

3.  The role of vowel perceptual cues in compensatory responses to perturbations of speech auditory feedback.

Authors:  Kevin J Reilly; Kathleen E Dougherty
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Sensorimotor adaptation in speech production.

Authors:  J F Houde; M I Jordan
Journal:  Science       Date:  1998-02-20       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Toward a consensus on symbolic notation of harmonics, resonances, and formants in vocalization.

Authors:  Ingo R Titze; Ronald J Baken; Kenneth W Bozeman; Svante Granqvist; Nathalie Henrich; Christian T Herbst; David M Howard; Eric J Hunter; Dean Kaelin; Raymond D Kent; Jody Kreiman; Malte Kob; Anders Löfqvist; Scott McCoy; Donald G Miller; Hubert Noé; Ronald C Scherer; John R Smith; Brad H Story; Jan G Švec; Sten Ternström; Joe Wolfe
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Speech perception without traditional speech cues.

Authors:  R E Remez; P E Rubin; D B Pisoni; T D Carrell
Journal:  Science       Date:  1981-05-22       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Morphology and development of the human vocal tract: a study using magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  W T Fitch; J Giedd
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Talkers alter vowel production in response to real-time formant perturbation even when instructed not to compensate.

Authors:  K G Munhall; E N MacDonald; S K Byrne; I Johnsrude
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Neural correlates of sine-wave speech intelligibility in human frontal and temporal cortex.

Authors:  Sattar Khoshkhoo; Matthew K Leonard; Nima Mesgarani; Edward F Chang
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2018-02-04       Impact factor: 2.381

10.  Vowel category boundaries enhance cortical and behavioral responses to speech feedback alterations.

Authors:  Caroline A Niziolek; Frank H Guenther
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-07-17       Impact factor: 6.167

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.