Literature DB >> 28653556

Supra-Segmental Changes in Speech Production as a Result of Spectral Feedback Degradation: Comparison with Lombard Speech.

Elizabeth D Casserly1, Yeling Wang1, Nicholas Celestin1, Lily Talesnick1, David B Pisoni2.   

Abstract

Perturbations to acoustic speech feedback have been typically localized to specific phonetic characteristics, for example, fundamental frequency (F0) or the first two formants (F1/F2), or affect all aspects of the speech signal equally, for example, via the addition of background noise. This paper examines the consequences of a more selective global perturbation: real-time cochlear implant (CI) simulation of acoustic speech feedback. Specifically, we examine the potential similarity between speakers' response to noise vocoding and the characteristics of Lombard speech. An acoustic analysis of supra-segmental characteristics in speaking rate, F0 production, and voice amplitude revealed changes that paralleled the Lombard effect in some domains but not others. Two studies of speech intelligibility complemented the acoustic analysis, finding that intelligibility significantly decreased as a result of CI simulation of speaker feedback. Together, the results point to differences in speakers' responses to these two superficially similar feedback manipulations. In both cases we see a complex, multi-faceted behavior on the part of talkers. We argue that more instances of global perturbation and broader response assessment are needed to determine whether such complexity is present in other feedback manipulations or if it represents a relatively rare exception to the typical compensatory feedback response.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Lombard speech; Speech motor planning; acoustic feedback; cochlear implant; intelligibility

Year:  2017        PMID: 28653556      PMCID: PMC6205159          DOI: 10.1177/0023830917713775

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lang Speech        ISSN: 0023-8309            Impact factor:   1.500


  34 in total

1.  Acoustic-phonetic characteristics of speech produced with communicative intent to counter adverse listening conditions.

Authors:  Valerie Hazan; Rachel Baker
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Perceptual learning of spectrally degraded speech and environmental sounds.

Authors:  Jeremy L Loebach; David B Pisoni
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Effects of noise and spectral resolution on vowel and consonant recognition: acoustic and electric hearing.

Authors:  Q J Fu; R V Shannon; X Wang
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Speaker compensation for local perturbation of fricative acoustic feedback.

Authors:  Elizabeth D Casserly
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  The contribution of durational and spectral changes to the Lombard speech intelligibility benefit.

Authors:  Martin Cooke; Catherine Mayo; Julián Villegas
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Effects of noise on speech production: acoustic and perceptual analyses.

Authors:  W V Summers; D B Pisoni; R H Bernacki; R I Pedlow; M A Stokes
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Inhibiting the Lombard effect.

Authors:  H L Pick; G M Siegel; P W Fox; S R Garber; J K Kearney
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1989-02       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Effects of frequency-shifted feedback on the pitch of vocal productions.

Authors:  J L ELman
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1981-07       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  The influence of environmental sound training on the perception of spectrally degraded speech and environmental sounds.

Authors:  Valeriy Shafiro; Stanley Sheft; Brian Gygi; Kim Thien N Ho
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2012-08-12

10.  Variability in word duration as a function of probability, speech style, and prosody.

Authors:  Rachel E Baker; Ann R Bradlow
Journal:  Lang Speech       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 1.500

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.