Literature DB >> 12003512

Sensorimotor adaptation of speech I: Compensation and adaptation.

John F Houde1, Michael I Jordan.   

Abstract

When motor actions (e.g., reaching with your hand) adapt to altered sensory feedback (e.g., viewing a shifted image of your hand through a prism), the phenomenon is called sensorimotor adaptation (SA). In the study reported here, SA was observed in speech. In two 2-hour experiments (adaptation and control), participants whispered a variety of CVC words. For those words containing the vowel /E/, participants heard auditory feedback of their whispering. A DSP-based vocoder processed the participants' auditory feedback in real time, allowing the formant frequencies of participants' auditory speech feedback to be shifted. In the adaptation experiment, formants were shifted along one edge of the vowel triangle. For half the participants, formants were shifted so participants heard /a/ when they produced /E/; for the other half, the shift made participants hear /i/ when they produced /E/. During the adaptation experiment, participants altered their production of /E/ to compensate for the altered feedback, and these production changes were retained when participants whispered with auditory feedback blocked by masking noise. In a control experiment, in which the formants were not shifted, participants' production changes were small and inconsistent. Participants exhibited a range of adaptations in response to the altered feedback, with some participants adapting almost completely, and other participants showing very little or no adaptation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12003512     DOI: 10.1044/1092-4388(2002/023)

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res        ISSN: 1092-4388            Impact factor:   2.297


  79 in total

1.  Movement goals and feedback and feedforward control mechanisms in speech production.

Authors:  Joseph S Perkell
Journal:  J Neurolinguistics       Date:  2010-03-26       Impact factor: 1.710

2.  Understanding the neural mechanisms involved in sensory control of voice production.

Authors:  Amy L Parkinson; Sabina G Flagmeier; Jordan L Manes; Charles R Larson; Bill Rogers; Donald A Robin
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2012-03-03       Impact factor: 6.556

3.  A cross-language study of compensation in response to real-time formant perturbation.

Authors:  Takashi Mitsuya; Ewen N Macdonald; David W Purcell; Kevin G Munhall
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Adaptive auditory feedback control of the production of formant trajectories in the Mandarin triphthong /iau/ and its pattern of generalization.

Authors:  Shanqing Cai; Satrajit S Ghosh; Frank H Guenther; Joseph S Perkell
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Neural mechanisms underlying auditory feedback control of speech.

Authors:  Jason A Tourville; Kevin J Reilly; Frank H Guenther
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2007-10-11       Impact factor: 6.556

6.  Halting in Single Word Production: A Test of the Perceptual Loop Theory of Speech Monitoring.

Authors:  L Robert Slevc; Victor S Ferreira
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 3.059

7.  Adaptive control of saccades via internal feedback.

Authors:  Haiyin Chen-Harris; Wilsaan M Joiner; Vincent Ethier; David S Zee; Reza Shadmehr
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2008-03-12       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  The role of vowel perceptual cues in compensatory responses to perturbations of speech auditory feedback.

Authors:  Kevin J Reilly; Kathleen E Dougherty
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 9.  A model for production, perception, and acquisition of actions in face-to-face communication.

Authors:  Bernd J Kröger; Stefan Kopp; Anja Lowit
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2009-12-10

10.  Plasticity in primary auditory cortex of monkeys with altered vocal production.

Authors:  Steven W Cheung; Srikantan S Nagarajan; Christoph E Schreiner; Purvis H Bedenbaugh; Andrew Wong
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2005-03-09       Impact factor: 6.167

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.