Literature DB >> 24989395

Size-specific dose estimate (SSDE) provides a simple method to calculate organ dose for pediatric CT examinations.

Bria M Moore1, Samuel L Brady1, Amy E Mirro2, Robert A Kaufman1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To investigate the correlation of size-specific dose estimate (SSDE) with absorbed organ dose, and to develop a simple methodology for estimating patient organ dose in a pediatric population (5-55 kg).
METHODS: Four physical anthropomorphic phantoms representing a range of pediatric body habitus were scanned with metal oxide semiconductor field effect transistor (MOSFET) dosimeters placed at 23 organ locations to determine absolute organ dose. Phantom absolute organ dose was divided by phantom SSDE to determine correlation between organ dose and SSDE. Organ dose correlation factors (CF(organ)(SSDE)) were then multiplied by patient-specific SSDE to estimate patient organ dose. The [CF(organ)(SSDE)) were used to retrospectively estimate individual organ doses from 352 chest and 241 abdominopelvic pediatric CT examinations, where mean patient weight was 22 kg ± 15 (range 5-55 kg), and mean patient age was 6 yrs ± 5 (range 4 months to 23 yrs). Patient organ dose estimates were compared to published pediatric Monte Carlo study results.
RESULTS: Phantom effective diameters were matched with patient population effective diameters to within 4 cm; thus, showing appropriate scalability of the phantoms across the entire pediatric population in this study. Individual CF(organ)(SSDE) were determined for a total of 23 organs in the chest and abdominopelvic region across nine weight subcategories. For organs fully covered by the scan volume, correlation in the chest (average 1.1; range 0.7-1.4) and abdominopelvic region (average 0.9; range 0.7-1.3) was near unity. For organ/tissue that extended beyond the scan volume (i.e., skin, bone marrow, and bone surface), correlation was determined to be poor (average 0.3; range: 0.1-0.4) for both the chest and abdominopelvic regions, respectively. A means to estimate patient organ dose was demonstrated. Calculated patient organ dose, using patient SSDE and CF(organ)(SSDE), was compared to previously published pediatric patient doses that accounted for patient size in their dose calculation, and was found to agree in the chest to better than an average of 5% (27.6/26.2) and in the abdominopelvic region to better than 2% (73.4/75.0).
CONCLUSIONS: For organs fully covered within the scan volume, the average correlation of SSDE and organ absolute dose was found to be better than ± 10%. In addition, this study provides a complete list of organ dose correlation factors (CF(organ)(SSDE)) for the chest and abdominopelvic regions, and describes a simple methodology to estimate individual pediatric patient organ dose based on patient SSDE.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24989395      PMCID: PMC5148074          DOI: 10.1118/1.4884227

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  28 in total

1.  Bone mineral acquisition in healthy Asian, Hispanic, black, and Caucasian youth: a longitudinal study.

Authors:  L K Bachrach; T Hastie; M C Wang; B Narasimhan; R Marcus
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 5.958

2.  Establishing a standard calibration methodology for MOSFET detectors in computed tomography dosimetry.

Authors:  S L Brady; R A Kaufman
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  The feasibility of a scanner-independent technique to estimate organ dose from MDCT scans: using CTDIvol to account for differences between scanners.

Authors:  Adam C Turner; Maria Zankl; John J DeMarco; Chris H Cagnon; Di Zhang; Erin Angel; Dianna D Cody; Donna M Stevens; Cynthia H McCollough; Michael F McNitt-Gray
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Application of commercial MOSFET detectors for in vivo dosimetry in the therapeutic x-ray range from 80 kV to 250 kV.

Authors:  Christian Ehringfeld; Susanne Schmid; Karin Poljanc; Christian Kirisits; Hannes Aiginger; Dietmar Georg
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2005-01-21       Impact factor: 3.609

5.  The 2007 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. ICRP publication 103.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ann ICRP       Date:  2007

6.  CT dose index and patient dose: they are not the same thing.

Authors:  Cynthia H McCollough; Shuai Leng; Lifeng Yu; Dianna D Cody; John M Boone; Michael F McNitt-Gray
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Organ doses for reference adult male and female undergoing computed tomography estimated by Monte Carlo simulations.

Authors:  Choonsik Lee; Kwang Pyo Kim; Daniel Long; Ryan Fisher; Chris Tien; Steven L Simon; Andre Bouville; Wesley E Bolch
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 8.  Basic anatomical and physiological data for use in radiological protection: the skeleton. A report of a Task Group of Committee 2 of the International Commission on Radiological Protection.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ann ICRP       Date:  1995

9.  Organ doses for reference pediatric and adolescent patients undergoing computed tomography estimated by Monte Carlo simulation.

Authors:  Choonsik Lee; Kwang Pyo Kim; Daniel J Long; Wesley E Bolch
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 4.071

10.  The feasibility of a regional CTDIvol to estimate organ dose from tube current modulated CT exams.

Authors:  Maryam Khatonabadi; Hyun J Kim; Peiyun Lu; Kyle L McMillan; Chris H Cagnon; John J DeMarco; Michael F McNitt-Gray
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 4.071

View more
  17 in total

1.  Automated tube voltage selection for radiation dose and contrast medium reduction at coronary CT angiography using 3(rd) generation dual-source CT.

Authors:  Stefanie Mangold; Julian L Wichmann; U Joseph Schoepf; Zachary B Poole; Christian Canstein; Akos Varga-Szemes; Damiano Caruso; Fabian Bamberg; Konstantin Nikolaou; Carlo N De Cecco
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2016-02-04       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Asian consortium on radiation dose of pediatric cardiac CT (ASCI-REDCARD).

Authors:  Peter K T Hui; Hyun Woo Goo; Jing Du; Janice J K Ip; Suzu Kanzaki; Young Jin Kim; Supika Kritsaneepaiboon; Oktavia Lilyasari; Suvipaporn Siripornpitak
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2017-04-24

3.  Accuracy of patient-specific organ dose estimates obtained using an automated image segmentation algorithm.

Authors:  Taly Gilat Schmidt; Adam S Wang; Thomas Coradi; Benjamin Haas; Josh Star-Lack
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2016-11-29

4.  In vivo radiation dosimetry and image quality of turbo-flash and retrospective dual-source CT coronary angiography.

Authors:  Nicolò Schicchi; Alberto Mari; Marco Fogante; Paolo Esposto Pirani; Giacomo Agliata; Niccolò Tosi; Pierpaolo Palumbo; Ester Cannizzaro; Federico Bruno; Alessandra Splendiani; Ernesto Di Cesare; Stefania Maggi; Andrea Giovagnoni
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2019-11-05       Impact factor: 3.469

5.  Technical note: Evaluation of a V-Net autosegmentation algorithm for pediatric CT scans: Performance, generalizability, and application to patient-specific CT dosimetry.

Authors:  Philip M Adamson; Vrunda Bhattbhatt; Sara Principi; Surabhi Beriwal; Linda S Strain; Michael Offe; Adam S Wang; Nghia-Jack Vo; Taly Gilat Schmidt; Petr Jordan
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2022-02-22       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  The role of chest computed tomography (CT) as a surveillance tool in children with high-risk neuroblastoma.

Authors:  Sara M Federico; Samuel L Brady; Alberto Pappo; Jianrong Wu; Shenghua Mao; Valerie J McPherson; Alison Young; Wayne L Furman; Robert Kaufman; Sue Kaste
Journal:  Pediatr Blood Cancer       Date:  2015-01-13       Impact factor: 3.167

7.  Validity of the size-specific dose estimate in adults undergoing coronary CT angiography: comparison with the volume CT dose index.

Authors:  Masafumi Kidoh; Daisuke Utsunomiya; Seitaro Oda; Yoshinori Funama; Hideaki Yuki; Takeshi Nakaura; Noriyuki Kai; Takeshi Nozaki; Yasuyuki Yamashita
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2015-10-06       Impact factor: 2.357

8.  The role of Size-Specific Dose Estimate (SSDE) in patient-specific organ dose and cancer risk estimation in paediatric chest and abdominopelvic CT examinations.

Authors:  Caro Franck; Charlot Vandevoorde; Ingeborg Goethals; Peter Smeets; Eric Achten; Koenraad Verstraete; Hubert Thierens; Klaus Bacher
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-12-15       Impact factor: 5.315

9.  Patient-specific organ and effective dose estimates in pediatric oncology computed tomography.

Authors:  Yiming Gao; Brian Quinn; Neeta Pandit-Taskar; Gerald Behr; Usman Mahmood; Daniel Long; X George Xu; Jean St Germain; Lawrence T Dauer
Journal:  Phys Med       Date:  2017-12-22       Impact factor: 2.685

10.  A comparison of pediatric and adult CT organ dose estimation methods.

Authors:  Yiming Gao; Brian Quinn; Usman Mahmood; Daniel Long; Yusuf Erdi; Jean St Germain; Neeta Pandit-Taskar; X George Xu; Wesley E Bolch; Lawrence T Dauer
Journal:  BMC Med Imaging       Date:  2017-04-26       Impact factor: 1.930

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.