Literature DB >> 18849683

CT dose: how to measure, how to reduce.

Cynthia H McCollough1.   

Abstract

The fundamental radiation dose parameter in computed tomography (CT) is the CT dose index (CTDI), which is an integral under the radiation dose profile of a single axial scan normalized to the nominal x-ray beam width. It estimates the average dose from a multiple-scan examination and is a directly measurable and standardized quantity. From this information, the dose length product (DLP) is calculated, which estimates the total dose delivered over a specific scan length. Finally, effective dose can be estimated and used to reflect the risk of a non-uniform exposure in terms of a whole-body exposure. To manage dose from CT while maintaining diagnostic image quality, scanner manufacturers have implemented tube current modulation, which may occur angularly around the patient, along the long axis of the patient, or both. Dose reductions of 20 to 50% have been reported using tube current modulation schemes. In the past two decades, the capabilities of CT imaging have expanded tremendously, including narrower image widths, improved temporal and spatial resolution, shorter scan times, and cardiac imaging techniques. Yet, the dose per typical exam (e.g., routine abdominal CT) has decreased by a factor of two or more over the same time period. Therefore, patients should be reassured that the benefits of medically-justified and appropriately-performed CT examinations are associated with radiation doses that continue to decrease as technology continues to evolve.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18849683     DOI: 10.1097/01.HP.0000326343.35884.03

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Phys        ISSN: 0017-9078            Impact factor:   1.316


  31 in total

1.  The feasibility of a scanner-independent technique to estimate organ dose from MDCT scans: using CTDIvol to account for differences between scanners.

Authors:  Adam C Turner; Maria Zankl; John J DeMarco; Chris H Cagnon; Di Zhang; Erin Angel; Dianna D Cody; Donna M Stevens; Cynthia H McCollough; Michael F McNitt-Gray
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Radiation dose reduction in computed tomography: techniques and future perspective.

Authors:  Lifeng Yu; Xin Liu; Shuai Leng; James M Kofler; Juan C Ramirez-Giraldo; Mingliang Qu; Jodie Christner; Joel G Fletcher; Cynthia H McCollough
Journal:  Imaging Med       Date:  2009-10

3.  Feasibility study of low tube voltage (80 kVp) coronary CT angiography combined with contrast medium reduction using iterative model reconstruction (IMR) on standard BMI patients.

Authors:  Fan Zhang; Li Yang; Xiang Song; Ying-Na Li; Yan Jiang; Xing-Hua Zhang; Hai-Yue Ju; Jian Wu; Rui-Ping Chang
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2015-11-26       Impact factor: 3.039

4.  Whole body imaging in the diagnosis of blunt trauma, ionizing radiation hazards and residual risk.

Authors:  J P Kepros; R C Opreanu; R Samaraweera; A Briningstool; C A Morrison; B D Mosher; P Schneider; P Stevens
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2012-07-12       Impact factor: 3.693

5.  The effects of bismuth breast shields in conjunction with automatic tube current modulation in CT imaging.

Authors:  Sabah Servaes; Xiaowei Zhu
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2013-05-23

6.  Automatic exposure control systems designed to maintain constant image noise: effects on computed tomography dose and noise relative to clinically accepted technique charts.

Authors:  Christopher P Favazza; Lifeng Yu; Shuai Leng; James M Kofler; Cynthia H McCollough
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  2015 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.826

7.  Dose reduction in oncological staging multidetector CT: effect of iterative reconstruction.

Authors:  M Karpitschka; D Augart; H-C Becker; M Reiser; A Graser
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 3.039

8.  Impact of organ-specific dose reduction on the image quality of head and neck CT angiography.

Authors:  L Schimmöller; R S Lanzman; P Heusch; S Dietrich; F Miese; J Aissa; T A Heusner; G Antoch; P Kröpil
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2013-01-09       Impact factor: 5.315

9.  Coronary computed tomography angiography using ultra-low-dose contrast media: radiation dose and image quality.

Authors:  Sei Komatsu; Teruaki Kamata; Atsuko Imai; Tomoki Ohara; Mitsuhiko Takewa; Ryoko Ohe; Kazuaki Miyaji; Junichi Yoshida; Kazuhisa Kodama
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2013-02-26       Impact factor: 2.357

10.  Comparison of radiation dose and image quality: 320-MDCT versus 64-MDCT coronary angiography.

Authors:  Atif Khan; Faisal Khosa; Khurram Nasir; Aya Yassin; Melvin E Clouse
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 3.959

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.