Literature DB >> 27172137

Analyzing the tradeoff between electrical complexity and accuracy in patient-specific computational models of deep brain stimulation.

Bryan Howell1, Cameron C McIntyre.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is an adjunctive therapy that is effective in treating movement disorders and shows promise for treating psychiatric disorders. Computational models of DBS have begun to be utilized as tools to optimize the therapy. Despite advancements in the anatomical accuracy of these models, there is still uncertainty as to what level of electrical complexity is adequate for modeling the electric field in the brain and the subsequent neural response to the stimulation. APPROACH: We used magnetic resonance images to create an image-based computational model of subthalamic DBS. The complexity of the volume conductor model was increased by incrementally including heterogeneity, anisotropy, and dielectric dispersion in the electrical properties of the brain. We quantified changes in the load of the electrode, the electric potential distribution, and stimulation thresholds of descending corticofugal (DCF) axon models. MAIN
RESULTS: Incorporation of heterogeneity altered the electric potentials and subsequent stimulation thresholds, but to a lesser degree than incorporation of anisotropy. Additionally, the results were sensitive to the choice of method for defining anisotropy, with stimulation thresholds of DCF axons changing by as much as 190%. Typical approaches for defining anisotropy underestimate the expected load of the stimulation electrode, which led to underestimation of the extent of stimulation. More accurate predictions of the electrode load were achieved with alternative approaches for defining anisotropy. The effects of dielectric dispersion were small compared to the effects of heterogeneity and anisotropy. SIGNIFICANCE: The results of this study help delineate the level of detail that is required to accurately model electric fields generated by DBS electrodes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27172137      PMCID: PMC5259803          DOI: 10.1088/1741-2560/13/3/036023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neural Eng        ISSN: 1741-2552            Impact factor:   5.379


  61 in total

1.  Improved optimization for the robust and accurate linear registration and motion correction of brain images.

Authors:  Mark Jenkinson; Peter Bannister; Michael Brady; Stephen Smith
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 6.556

2.  Cortico-subthalamic white matter tract strength predicts interindividual efficacy in stopping a motor response.

Authors:  Birte U Forstmann; Max C Keuken; Sara Jahfari; Pierre-Louis Bazin; Jane Neumann; Andreas Schäfer; Alfred Anwander; Robert Turner
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2011-12-28       Impact factor: 6.556

3.  Diffusion tensor MR imaging of the human brain.

Authors:  C Pierpaoli; P Jezzard; P J Basser; A Barnett; G Di Chiro
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  Diffusion tensor imaging in the assessment of normal-appearing brain tissue damage in relapsing neuromyelitis optica.

Authors:  C S Yu; F C Lin; K C Li; T Z Jiang; C Z Zhu; W Qin; H Sun; P Chan
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 3.825

5.  Electrical conductivity in cat cerebellar cortex.

Authors:  M Yedlin; H Kwan; J T Murphy; H Nguyen-Huu; Y C Wong
Journal:  Exp Neurol       Date:  1974-06       Impact factor: 5.330

6.  Axon diameter and myelin sheath thickness in nerve fibres of the ventral spinal root of the seventh lumbar nerve of the adult and developing cat.

Authors:  C H Berthold; I Nilsson; M Rydmark
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  1983-05       Impact factor: 2.610

7.  Patient-specific models of deep brain stimulation: influence of field model complexity on neural activation predictions.

Authors:  Ashutosh Chaturvedi; Christopher R Butson; Scott F Lempka; Scott E Cooper; Cameron C McIntyre
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 8.955

8.  Accurate and robust brain image alignment using boundary-based registration.

Authors:  Douglas N Greve; Bruce Fischl
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2009-06-30       Impact factor: 6.556

9.  Differences among implanted pulse generator waveforms cause variations in the neural response to deep brain stimulation.

Authors:  Christopher R Butson; Cameron C McIntyre
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2007-06-19       Impact factor: 3.708

10.  Which Neuronal Elements are Activated Directly by Spinal Cord Stimulation.

Authors:  Jan Holsheimer
Journal:  Neuromodulation       Date:  2002-01
View more
  25 in total

1.  Simulation of transcranial magnetic stimulation in head model with morphologically-realistic cortical neurons.

Authors:  Aman S Aberra; Boshuo Wang; Warren M Grill; Angel V Peterchev
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2019-10-07       Impact factor: 8.955

2.  Multi-objective particle swarm optimization for postoperative deep brain stimulation targeting of subthalamic nucleus pathways.

Authors:  Edgar Peña; Simeng Zhang; Remi Patriat; Joshua E Aman; Jerrold L Vitek; Noam Harel; Matthew D Johnson
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2018-09-13       Impact factor: 5.379

3.  Biophysical basis of subthalamic local field potentials recorded from deep brain stimulation electrodes.

Authors:  Nicholas Maling; Scott F Lempka; Zack Blumenfeld; Helen Bronte-Stewart; Cameron C McIntyre
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2018-07-18       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Particle swarm optimization for programming deep brain stimulation arrays.

Authors:  Edgar Peña; Simeng Zhang; Steve Deyo; YiZi Xiao; Matthew D Johnson
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2017-01-09       Impact factor: 5.379

5.  Stimulation Efficiency With Decaying Exponential Waveforms in a Wirelessly Powered Switched-Capacitor Discharge Stimulation System.

Authors:  Hyung-Min Lee; Bryan Howell; Warren M Grill; Maysam Ghovanloo
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2017-08-17       Impact factor: 4.538

6.  Quantifying the axonal pathways directly stimulated in therapeutic subcallosal cingulate deep brain stimulation.

Authors:  Bryan Howell; Ki Sueng Choi; Kabilar Gunalan; Justin Rajendra; Helen S Mayberg; Cameron C McIntyre
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2018-10-11       Impact factor: 5.038

7.  Characterization of the stimulus waveforms generated by implantable pulse generators for deep brain stimulation.

Authors:  Scott F Lempka; Bryan Howell; Kabilar Gunalan; Andre G Machado; Cameron C McIntyre
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2018-01-31       Impact factor: 3.708

8.  Connectivity Predicts deep brain stimulation outcome in Parkinson disease.

Authors:  Andreas Horn; Martin Reich; Johannes Vorwerk; Ningfei Li; Gregor Wenzel; Qianqian Fang; Tanja Schmitz-Hübsch; Robert Nickl; Andreas Kupsch; Jens Volkmann; Andrea A Kühn; Michael D Fox
Journal:  Ann Neurol       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 10.422

9.  Role of Soft-Tissue Heterogeneity in Computational Models of Deep Brain Stimulation.

Authors:  Bryan Howell; Cameron C McIntyre
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2016-09-08       Impact factor: 8.955

10.  Quantifying axonal responses in patient-specific models of subthalamic deep brain stimulation.

Authors:  Kabilar Gunalan; Bryan Howell; Cameron C McIntyre
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2018-01-10       Impact factor: 6.556

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.