Literature DB >> 24771203

Comparison of spinal cord stimulation profiles from intra- and extradural electrode arrangements by finite element modelling.

Qiujun Huang1, Hiroyuki Oya, Oliver E Flouty, Chandan G Reddy, Matthew A Howard, George T Gillies, Marcel Utz.   

Abstract

Spinal cord stimulation currently relies on extradural electrode arrays that are separated from the spinal cord surface by a highly conducting layer of cerebrospinal fluid. It has recently been suggested that intradural placement of the electrodes in direct contact with the pial surface could greatly enhance the specificity and efficiency of stimulation. The present computational study aims at quantifying and comparing the electrical current distributions as well as the spatial recruitment profiles resulting from extra- and intra-dural electrode arrangements. The electrical potential distribution is calculated using a 3D finite element model of the human thoracic spinal canal. The likely recruitment areas are then obtained using the potential as input to an equivalent circuit model of the pre-threshold axonal response. The results show that the current threshold to recruitment of axons in the dorsal column is more than an order of magnitude smaller for intradural than extradural stimulation. Intradural placement of the electrodes also leads to much higher contrast between the stimulation thresholds for the dorsal root entry zone and the dorsal column, allowing better focusing of the stimulus.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24771203     DOI: 10.1007/s11517-014-1157-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput        ISSN: 0140-0118            Impact factor:   2.602


  37 in total

Review 1.  New trends in neuromodulation for the management of neuropathic pain.

Authors:  Kenneth M Aló; Jan Holsheimer
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 4.654

2.  Power and signal transmission protocol for a contactless subdural spinal cord stimulation device.

Authors:  Suk-Heung Song; George T Gillies; Matthew A Howard; Brian Kuhnley; Marcel Utz
Journal:  Biomed Microdevices       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 2.838

3.  The dependence of auditory nerve rate adaptation on electric stimulus parameters, electrode position, and fiber diameter: a computer model study.

Authors:  Jihwan Woo; Charles A Miller; Paul J Abbas
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2009-12-22

4.  Excitation of dorsal root fibers in spinal cord stimulation: a theoretical study.

Authors:  J J Struijk; J Holsheimer; H B Boom
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 4.538

Review 5.  Spinal cord stimulation: mechanisms of action.

Authors:  John C Oakley; Joshua P Prager
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2002-11-15       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Triple leads programmed to perform as longitudinal guarded cathodes in spinal cord stimulation: a modeling study.

Authors:  Vishwanath Sankarasubramanian; Jan R Buitenweg; Jan Holsheimer; Peter Veltink
Journal:  Neuromodulation       Date:  2011-08-19

7.  Electrode contact configuration and energy consumption in spinal cord stimulation.

Authors:  Cecile C de Vos; Marjolein P Hilgerink; Hendrik P J Buschman; Jan Holsheimer
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 4.654

8.  Financial impact of spinal cord stimulation on the healthcare budget: a comparative analysis of costs in Canada and the United States.

Authors:  Krishna Kumar; Sharon Bishop
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2009-06

9.  Technical performance of percutaneous leads for spinal cord stimulation: a modeling study.

Authors:  Ljubomir Manola; Jan Holsheimer; Peter Veltink
Journal:  Neuromodulation       Date:  2005-04

10.  Which Neuronal Elements are Activated Directly by Spinal Cord Stimulation.

Authors:  Jan Holsheimer
Journal:  Neuromodulation       Date:  2002-01
View more
  7 in total

1.  A spectral element method with adaptive segmentation for accurately simulating extracellular electrical stimulation of neurons.

Authors:  Calvin D Eiber; Socrates Dokos; Nigel H Lovell; Gregg J Suaning
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2016-08-19       Impact factor: 2.602

Review 2.  Spinal dura mater: biophysical characteristics relevant to medical device development.

Authors:  Sean J Nagel; Chandan G Reddy; Leonardo A Frizon; Matthieu K Chardon; Marshall Holland; Andre G Machado; George T Gillies; Matthew A Howard; Saul Wilson
Journal:  J Med Eng Technol       Date:  2018-03-23

3.  An ovine model of spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Saul Wilson; Kingsley O Abode-Iyamah; John W Miller; Chandan G Reddy; Sina Safayi; Douglas C Fredericks; Nicholas D Jeffery; Nicole A DeVries-Watson; Sara K Shivapour; Stephanus Viljoen; Brian D Dalm; Katherine N Gibson-Corley; Michael D Johnson; George T Gillies; Matthew A Howard
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2016-10-19       Impact factor: 1.985

4.  The Quasi-uniform assumption for Spinal Cord Stimulation translational research.

Authors:  Niranjan Khadka; Dennis Q Truong; Preston Williams; John H Martin; Marom Bikson
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2019-10-04       Impact factor: 2.390

5.  Conducting molybdenum sulfide/graphene oxide/polyvinyl alcohol nanocomposite hydrogel for repairing spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Lingling Chen; Wanshun Wang; Zefeng Lin; Yao Lu; Hu Chen; Binglin Li; Zhan Li; Hong Xia; Lihua Li; Tao Zhang
Journal:  J Nanobiotechnology       Date:  2022-05-06       Impact factor: 9.429

6.  Ovine model of neuropathic pain for assessing mechanisms of spinal cord stimulation therapy via dorsal horn recordings, von Frey filaments, and gait analysis.

Authors:  Chandan G Reddy; John W Miller; Kingsley O Abode-Iyamah; Sina Safayi; Saul Wilson; Brian D Dalm; Douglas C Fredericks; George T Gillies; Matthew A Howard; Timothy J Brennan
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2018-06-15       Impact factor: 3.133

7.  Evaluation of intradural stimulation efficiency and selectivity in a computational model of spinal cord stimulation.

Authors:  Bryan Howell; Shivanand P Lad; Warren M Grill
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-12-23       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.